DoD's $10.6M Management Consulting Contract with Calibre Systems Inc. Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,575,709 ($10.6M)
Contractor: Calibre Systems Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-03-31
End Date: 2011-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,917 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: MANAGEMENT AND ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20310
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.6 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC for work described as: MANAGEMENT AND ANALYTICAL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for management and analytical services, indicating a need for strategic and operational support. 2. The contract value of approximately $10.6 million over its period of performance suggests a significant engagement. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process and potential for competitive pricing. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to general management consulting services. 5. The contract duration of 1917 days (over 5 years) suggests a long-term need for these services. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the Department of Defense. 7. The contract was awarded as a Firm Fixed Price type, which shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.6 million for management and analytical services over more than five years appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts within the Department of Defense suggests that this award falls within expected spending ranges for comprehensive support. The firm fixed-price structure also indicates an effort to control costs by transferring risk to the contractor, which is a positive indicator for value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through a full and open competition process, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bids indicates a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive bidding environment generally leads to better price discovery and can result in more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently by leveraging market forces to secure the best possible price and service for these management and analytical services.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from enhanced management and analytical capabilities, potentially leading to improved operational efficiency and strategic decision-making. Services delivered likely include strategic planning, process improvement, organizational analysis, and other management consulting functions. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the contract was awarded, but the services could support broader Army operations. Workforce implications may include the engagement of specialized consultants and analysts, both from the prime contractor and potentially subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed throughout the contract lifecycle.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical management and analytical functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
- Ensuring the contractor's proposed solutions align with evolving Army strategic objectives requires ongoing oversight.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, promoting cost control.
- Long contract duration (over 5 years) indicates a stable, ongoing need and allows for deeper integration of services.
- The contractor, Calibre Systems Inc., has a track record of performing government contracts, suggesting familiarity with federal procurement processes.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for government agencies seeking to optimize operations, implement new strategies, and improve overall effectiveness. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks for large federal consulting contracts often run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, making this $10.6 million award a moderate-sized engagement within the broader federal consulting landscape.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit indication of small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. The award to Calibre Systems Inc., a mid-sized to large business, suggests that the primary focus was on securing specialized expertise rather than promoting small business participation through set-asides. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to meet performance standards within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and reviews may not always be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Management Consulting Services
- Army Strategic Planning Support
- Administrative Management Services
- General Management Consulting Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep
- Contractor performance risk
- Alignment with evolving strategic objectives
Tags
management-consulting, analytical-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, administrative-management, general-management-consulting, district-of-columbia, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.6 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. MANAGEMENT AND ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-03-31. End: 2011-06-30.
What is Calibre Systems Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?
Calibre Systems Inc. has a significant history of performing contracts for the federal government, including numerous awards from the Department of Defense and its various branches, such as the Department of the Army. Their contract portfolio often includes services related to management, logistics, engineering, and information technology. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts would involve reviewing performance evaluations, any past performance issues or commendations, and the types of services they have successfully delivered. A review of publicly available contract databases often shows a consistent pattern of awards, indicating a sustained presence and capability in serving federal agencies. Their experience suggests a familiarity with federal acquisition regulations and operational requirements.
How does the $10.6 million contract value compare to similar management consulting contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?
The $10.6 million contract value for management and analytical services over approximately five years is a moderate-sized award within the Department of the Army's extensive contracting portfolio. The Army frequently awards large-scale consulting contracts that can range from a few million to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the complexity and duration of the services required. This specific contract's value appears reasonable when benchmarked against other contracts for similar services, such as strategic planning, organizational analysis, and process improvement initiatives. Factors influencing the value include the number of labor hours required, the seniority and expertise of the personnel assigned, and the specific deliverables expected. Without detailed statements of work for comparison, it's challenging to provide a precise benchmark, but the amount is not unusually high or low for the described services.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
Primary risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements may expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays. Another risk is contractor performance; if Calibre Systems Inc. fails to deliver the expected quality or timeliness of services, it could impact the Army's operations. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management by the COR, clear definition and adherence to the Statement of Work (SOW), regular performance reviews, and the firm fixed-price contract structure itself, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively. The competitive award process also mitigates the risk of selecting an underqualified vendor. The long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure continued alignment with evolving Army needs.
What is the expected impact of these management and analytical services on the Department of the Army's operational effectiveness?
The expected impact of these management and analytical services is to enhance the Department of the Army's operational effectiveness through improved strategic planning, process optimization, and organizational efficiency. Consultants are often brought in to provide objective analysis, identify areas for improvement, and recommend solutions that internal staff may not have the time or specialized expertise to develop. This could translate into more streamlined workflows, better resource allocation, enhanced decision-making capabilities, and ultimately, a stronger overall mission readiness. The services aim to provide actionable insights that support the Army in achieving its strategic objectives and adapting to changing environments.
How has federal spending on management and analytical services, particularly for the Department of the Army, trended over the past decade?
Federal spending on management and analytical services, including for the Department of the Army, has generally seen fluctuations but has remained a significant category of expenditure over the past decade. Agencies consistently require external expertise for strategic planning, organizational reform, IT modernization, and operational efficiency improvements. While specific figures for the Army's consulting spend would require detailed analysis of budget documents and contract databases, the overall trend for federal consulting services has been influenced by factors such as defense spending levels, government-wide efficiency initiatives, and the increasing complexity of federal missions. Periods of budget constraint might see a shift towards more targeted, shorter-term engagements, while periods of expansion or major reform initiatives often lead to larger, longer-term contracts like the one awarded to Calibre Systems Inc.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W74V8H06T0046
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6354 WALKER LN STE 300, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,610,069
Exercised Options: $10,610,068
Current Obligation: $10,575,709
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-03-31
Current End Date: 2011-06-30
Potential End Date: 2011-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-07-31
More Contracts from Calibre Systems Inc
- THE Vdpo Requires Support Services to Assist in Total Program Development, Design, Implementation, Sustainment, and Analysis to Include, Program Management; Strategic Planning (E.G., Policy Planning and Analysis, and Assessment of Capital Asset and Facility Planning/Utilization); Research and Analysis (E.G., Modeling and Simulation); Planning, Programming and Budgeting Execution (ppbe) Processes; Organizational Analysis and Design; Change Management, Strategic Communications, Program Operations and Deployment, and Veterans Disability Claims Development. This Support Includes Program Implementation World-Wide in Support of Over 300,000 Transitioning Service Members Across More Than 251 Installations Within the Continental United States (conus) and Outside the Contiguous United States (oconus) Annually. IT IS Estimated This Will Include 9,200 Conus TAP Classes, 800 Oconus Taps Classes and Assisting With the Development or Intake of 210,000 Disability Claims Annually. Admin MOD to ADD FAR Clause 52.232-99 — $147.6M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Transition Assistance Program (TAP) — $145.8M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- NTC Range Sustainment Services, TOP 004 — $69.5M (Department of Defense)
- Dasa-Ce Osmis Support Services FY2021-2026 — $56.7M (Department of Defense)
- Saint-Louis:electronic DOC Records "igf::ct::igf" — $47.0M (Department of the Interior)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)