Army Awards $28.3M for Turbine Engine Refurbishment to General Electric, No Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,300,858 ($28.3M)

Contractor: General Electric Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-10-03

End Date: 2027-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,092 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: REFURBISHMENT AND OVERHAUL OF TURBINE ENGINES FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALES CUSTOMERS.

Place of Performance

Location: ARKANSAS CITY, COWLEY County, KANSAS, 67005

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.3 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: REFURBISHMENT AND OVERHAUL OF TURBINE ENGINES FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALES CUSTOMERS. Key points: 1. Significant contract value for engine refurbishment services. 2. Sole-source award to General Electric raises competition concerns. 3. Long-term contract (3 years) for foreign military sales customers. 4. Focus on aircraft engine parts manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $28.3 million for turbine engine refurbishment is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for engine overhaul services is difficult without more specific details on the scope of work and the specific engine types involved. The lack of competition makes a direct price comparison challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. This approach limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government compared to a competitive process. The justification for sole-source is not provided.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may result in taxpayers paying a premium for these refurbishment services, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Ensures operational readiness of aircraft for allied nations through engine maintenance. Supports the defense industrial base by providing work for a major manufacturer. Potential for increased costs to taxpayers due to sole-source award. Impacts foreign military sales capabilities and readiness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing sector, a critical component of the aerospace and defense industry. Spending in this sector is often characterized by high R&D costs, specialized manufacturing, and significant government contracts, particularly for military applications.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to General Electric Company, a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific award, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. This sole-source award to a large entity bypasses opportunities for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army awarded this contract. Oversight would typically involve monitoring contract performance, ensuring adherence to terms, and verifying the necessity and cost-effectiveness of the sole-source justification. The duration and value suggest a need for diligent oversight to protect taxpayer interests.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufac, department-of-defense, ks, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.3 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. REFURBISHMENT AND OVERHAUL OF TURBINE ENGINES FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALES CUSTOMERS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-10-03. End: 2027-09-30.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure the price is fair and reasonable without competition?

The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding why competition was bypassed. Typically, this involves demonstrating that only one responsible source can provide the required services or supplies. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the government adequately explored competitive options or obtained a fair price. The lack of transparency here raises concerns about potential overspending and missed opportunities for better value.

How does the per-unit cost of refurbishing these turbine engines compare to industry benchmarks or previous contracts for similar services, especially given the sole-source nature of this award?

Benchmarking the per-unit cost is challenging without a competitive process. Sole-source contracts often lack the price transparency that competition provides. To assess value, the Army should have conducted a thorough price analysis, comparing the proposed costs against historical data, commercial price lists (if applicable), and other available market information. The absence of this analysis makes it difficult to determine if the $28.3 million represents a fair market price.

What is the long-term strategic benefit of this sole-source contract for foreign military sales customers, and does it align with broader U.S. foreign policy and defense objectives?

This contract supports the operational readiness of allied nations by ensuring their aircraft engines are maintained. Strategically, it reinforces U.S. partnerships and interoperability within allied air forces. However, the sole-source nature raises questions about the long-term cost-effectiveness of maintaining these capabilities for allies. Aligning such contracts with broader foreign policy goals requires ensuring that the costs incurred do not unduly burden U.S. resources or create dependencies that could be exploited.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,300,858

Exercised Options: $28,300,858

Current Obligation: $28,300,858

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W58RGZ20D0069

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-10-03

Current End Date: 2027-09-30

Potential End Date: 2027-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-06-11

More Contracts from General Electric Company

View all General Electric Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending