DoD's $230M Shadow UAS Support Contract Awarded to Textron Systems Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $230,209,876 ($230.2M)
Contractor: Textron Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2013-11-01
End Date: 2018-05-01
Contract Duration: 1,642 days
Daily Burn Rate: $140.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FOLLOW-ON CONTRACT FOR SHADOW UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND OPERATIONAL/SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2014 AND 2015.
Place of Performance
Location: COCKEYSVILLE, BALTIMORE County, MARYLAND, 21030
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $230.2 million to TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: FOLLOW-ON CONTRACT FOR SHADOW UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND OPERATIONAL/SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2014 AND 2015. Key points: 1. This contract represents significant spending on unmanned aircraft system sustainment. 2. Textron Systems Corporation is the sole provider for this follow-on contract. 3. Potential risks include vendor lock-in and lack of competitive pricing pressure. 4. The Defense sector continues to invest heavily in advanced aviation technologies.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's cost-plus incentive fee structure aims to control costs, but without competition, it's difficult to benchmark against market rates. The total value of $230M over several years warrants scrutiny for efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers are receiving the best possible value for this significant expenditure.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long duration of the contract could lead to escalating costs over time. Dependence on a single vendor for critical UAS support poses a strategic risk.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Performance-based logistics support
- Operational and sustainment support
Sector Analysis
The Department of Defense's spending on unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is substantial, reflecting the growing importance of drone technology in military operations. Benchmarks for similar sustainment contracts are difficult to establish due to the sole-source nature of this award.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's sole-source nature suggests limited oversight on pricing competitiveness. Further review would be needed to assess the effectiveness of performance metrics and accountability mechanisms within the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing.
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPIF structure without competition.
- Long contract duration increases risk of price escalation.
- Vendor lock-in and strategic dependence.
- Lack of transparency in pricing justification.
Tags
aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, md, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $230.2 million to TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION. FOLLOW-ON CONTRACT FOR SHADOW UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND OPERATIONAL/SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2014 AND 2015.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $230.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-11-01. End: 2018-05-01.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or the absence of viable alternative sources. Without specific documentation, it's presumed that the government determined Textron Systems Corporation was the only entity capable of providing the required specialized support for the Shadow UAS. Further investigation into the contracting officer's determination is warranted.
How does the cost-plus incentive fee structure ensure cost control and value for money in a sole-source environment?
A cost-plus incentive fee (CPIF) contract aims to incentivize the contractor to control costs by sharing savings or overruns with the government based on pre-defined targets. However, in a sole-source scenario, the baseline cost targets themselves may not be as rigorously tested as they would be in a competitive environment, potentially limiting the effectiveness of the incentive structure.
What are the long-term implications of relying on a single vendor for critical UAS operational and sustainment support?
Long-term reliance on a single vendor can lead to vendor lock-in, reduced bargaining power for the government, and potential price increases over time. It also poses a strategic risk if the vendor faces financial difficulties or decides to exit the market. Diversification of support or developing organic government capabilities could mitigate these risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W58RGZ13R0009
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Textron Inc
Address: 124 INDUSTRY LANE, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21030
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $376,291,107
Exercised Options: $237,561,151
Current Obligation: $230,209,876
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-11-01
Current End Date: 2018-05-01
Potential End Date: 2018-05-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-07-13
More Contracts from Textron Systems Corporation
- Procure 14 Shadow Unmanned Aircraft Systems — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- "igf::ot::igf::exempt" — $685.9M (Department of Defense)
- UCA for CBU 105 — $640.8M (Department of Defense)
- FY 2010 Shadow 200 Tuas Performance Based Logistics Contract — $470.7M (Department of Defense)
- PBL Contract — $451.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)