Army awards $14.5M logistics contract for Fort Sill, OK, to Akima Facilities Operations LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,458,617 ($14.5M)

Contractor: Akima Facilities Operations LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-06-10

End Date: 2026-09-09

Contract Duration: 456 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENHANCED ARMY GLOBAL LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE RE-COMPETE FOR MAINTENANCE, SUPPLY, AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR FORT SILL, OKLAHOMA.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT SILL, COMANCHE County, OKLAHOMA, 73503

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.5 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC for work described as: ENHANCED ARMY GLOBAL LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE RE-COMPETE FOR MAINTENANCE, SUPPLY, AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR FORT SILL, OKLAHOMA. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential maintenance, supply, and transportation services. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Duration of 456 days suggests a medium-term operational need. 4. Firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. Akima Facilities Operations LLC is the sole awardee for this specific order. 6. The contract is a re-compete, implying a continuation of existing services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $14.5 million over 456 days represents a significant investment in base support services. Benchmarking against similar logistics and facilities support contracts for Army installations of comparable size and scope would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to contain costs. The number of bidders (6) also provides a positive signal regarding potential price competition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Six bids were received, indicating a healthy level of competition for this requirement. The presence of multiple bidders generally supports price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more efficient allocation of funds and potentially lower costs compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Fort Sill, Oklahoma, will benefit from continued essential maintenance, supply, and transportation services. Military personnel and their families stationed at Fort Sill will experience reliable base operations. The contract supports the operational readiness of the U.S. Army. Local and regional economies may see indirect benefits through employment and resource utilization by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues if past performance is not thoroughly vetted.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical base support functions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks.
The contract is a re-compete, implying established service delivery capabilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of government operations, particularly for military installations. This sector encompasses a wide range of services essential for maintaining infrastructure and supporting personnel. The market for these services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually to ensure the smooth functioning of bases and facilities across various agencies. This specific award contributes to the broader landscape of defense logistics and base operations support.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. As this was a full and open competition, the primary focus was likely on the best overall value from all eligible bidders. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Army Logistics Readiness
Base Operations Support Services
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Transportation and Supply Chain Management

Risk Flags

Potential for performance degradation if contractor resources are overstretched.
Reliance on a single awardee for critical base support functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.5 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC. ENHANCED ARMY GLOBAL LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE RE-COMPETE FOR MAINTENANCE, SUPPLY, AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR FORT SILL, OKLAHOMA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-10. End: 2026-09-09.

What is the contractor's past performance record with the Department of Defense, particularly on similar logistics and facilities support contracts?

A comprehensive review of Akima Facilities Operations LLC's past performance would involve examining their track record on previous government contracts, specifically those involving maintenance, supply, and transportation services. This includes assessing their adherence to schedules, quality of work, responsiveness to issues, and overall customer satisfaction ratings. Data from sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be crucial. For this specific re-compete, understanding their performance on the previous iteration of this contract at Fort Sill would be highly relevant. A strong past performance record would indicate a lower risk of performance issues and a higher likelihood of successful contract execution, justifying the award.

How does the awarded price compare to the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) and other bids received?

To assess the value for money, the awarded price of approximately $14.5 million needs to be compared against the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) and the bids submitted by the other five competitors. If the awarded price is significantly below the IGCE, it might suggest aggressive pricing or potential underestimation of scope. Conversely, if it's close to or above the IGCE, it warrants scrutiny to ensure it represents fair and reasonable pricing. Analyzing the range of bids can reveal the level of competition and whether the awardee's price is competitive within that range. A price that is well-supported by the IGCE and competitive among bidders generally indicates good value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) outlined in the contract, and how will performance be measured?

The contract likely includes specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) designed to measure the contractor's performance in delivering maintenance, supply, and transportation services. These might include metrics such as response times for maintenance requests, on-time delivery rates for supplies, vehicle availability and uptime, and accuracy in inventory management. Performance measurement will typically involve regular reporting by the contractor, site inspections, and reviews by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). Adherence to these KPIs and SLAs is critical for ensuring the contractor meets the government's requirements and for determining future contract renewals or awards.

What is the historical spending trend for similar logistics and support services at Fort Sill or comparable Army installations?

Examining historical spending for logistics and support services at Fort Sill and similar Army installations provides crucial context for evaluating the current $14.5 million award. This involves looking at previous contract values, durations, and the types of services procured over the past several years. Trends in spending can reveal whether costs are increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether the scope of services has changed. Comparing this award to the historical average for similar services at comparable bases helps determine if the current price is in line with established spending patterns or if it represents an anomaly, potentially indicating a need for further investigation into cost drivers or efficiencies.

Are there any identified risks associated with Akima Facilities Operations LLC's ability to perform these services, based on their financial stability or operational capacity?

Assessing the risks associated with Akima Facilities Operations LLC involves evaluating their financial stability, operational capacity, and management expertise relevant to the scale and complexity of the Fort Sill contract. This typically includes reviewing financial statements, assessing their existing infrastructure and workforce, and considering any past performance issues or unresolved disputes. While the award suggests the government has confidence in their capabilities, potential risks could include resource constraints, unforeseen operational challenges, or difficulties in scaling operations to meet demand. Proactive risk mitigation strategies, such as robust oversight and clear communication channels, are essential.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2553 DULLES VIEW DR STE 700, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,458,617

Exercised Options: $14,458,617

Current Obligation: $14,458,617

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W52P1J18G0030

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline