DoD's $18.9M R&D Contract for Joint Program Executive Services Awarded to Pragmatics, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,882,741 ($18.9M)

Contractor: Pragmatics, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-01

End Date: 2014-10-10

Contract Duration: 1,500 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: JOINT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINMENT

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22204, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.9 million to PRAGMATICS, LLC for work described as: JOINT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Pragmatics, LLC for R&D services. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 3. Contract duration was 1500 days. 4. The NAICS code 541712 indicates Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 5. The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The award amount of $18.9M for a 1500-day duration suggests a moderate per-day cost, but without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract utilized 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process but with specific exclusions. This method aims for fair competition while potentially limiting the pool of bidders. The pricing discovery is influenced by the incentive fee structure.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for research and development services. The effectiveness of the R&D and the efficiency of the contractor's performance will determine the ultimate value for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Supports research and development efforts within the Department of Defense. Contracting process aimed for competitive bidding, potentially leading to better value. The specific R&D focus impacts national security and technological advancement. Contract duration of 1500 days suggests a long-term project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically NAICS 541712. Spending in this sector is crucial for technological advancement and national security. Benchmarks for R&D contracts vary widely based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). The effectiveness of oversight depends on clear performance metrics, regular reporting, and proactive management of the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.9 million to PRAGMATICS, LLC. JOINT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRAGMATICS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-01. End: 2014-10-10.

What specific research and development objectives were prioritized under this contract, and how do they align with current DoD strategic goals?

The contract focused on 'JOINT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINMENT.' While the specific objectives are not detailed, this likely pertains to developing and maintaining critical IT or communication systems for joint military operations. Alignment with DoD goals would depend on whether these services directly support modernization, interoperability, or readiness initiatives outlined in strategic documents.

How effectively did the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method ensure fair pricing and access to the best available R&D capabilities?

This method suggests a competitive process was initiated, but certain sources were excluded. While it aims for fairness, the exclusions could have limited the bidder pool, potentially impacting price discovery and access to all innovative solutions. The effectiveness hinges on the justification for exclusions and the competitiveness among the remaining bidders.

What mechanisms were in place to manage the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure and ensure efficient use of taxpayer funds for R&D outcomes?

Managing a CPIF contract requires robust oversight, clear performance metrics tied to incentives, and regular financial reviews. Mechanisms would include detailed cost tracking, milestone verification, and performance evaluations by DISA. The success in ensuring efficient fund use depends on the rigor of these oversight activities and the contractor's ability to meet performance targets cost-effectively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1761 BUSINESS CENTER DR, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,912,612

Exercised Options: $18,912,612

Current Obligation: $18,882,741

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 6

Total Subaward Amount: $4,219,596

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102808D2010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-09-01

Current End Date: 2014-10-10

Potential End Date: 2014-10-10 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-06-18

More Contracts from Pragmatics, LLC

View all Pragmatics, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending