Treasury's $10.1M Contract for Temporary Help Services with Kelly Services, Inc. Raises Oversight Questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,099,168 ($10.1M)

Contractor: Kelly Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2006-04-01

End Date: 2007-09-30

Contract Duration: 547 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.5K/day

Number of Offers Received: 16

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20850

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $10.1 million to KELLY SERVICES, INC. for work described as: SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract value of $10.1 million for temporary staffing services is significant. 2. Kelly Services, Inc. is a large, established provider in the staffing industry. 3. The contract's duration of 547 days and Time and Materials pricing model present potential cost escalation risks. 4. The 'MD' contract type suggests a specific type of procurement, potentially limiting broader competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Time and Materials pricing model, while flexible, can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not closely managed. Benchmarking against similar temporary staffing contracts would be necessary to fully assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract type 'MD' and the lack of explicit competition details make it difficult to assess the procurement method. If competition was limited, it could impact price discovery and potentially lead to less favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The government paid $10.1 million for temporary staffing. Without clear competition, taxpayers may have overpaid if more cost-effective options were available.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded $10.1 million for temporary staffing services over 18 months. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service utilized external staffing to meet operational needs. The contract's duration and payment structure warrant scrutiny for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The temporary help services sector is competitive, with many large and small providers. Government contracts in this area typically aim for cost-effectiveness through competitive bidding and managed service agreements.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in subcontracting or if this contract was specifically set aside for small business participation. Larger contracts often have subcontracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'MD' contract type and the Time and Materials pricing model necessitate robust oversight to ensure fair pricing and prevent scope creep. Tracking hours and materials diligently is crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

temporary-help-services, department-of-the-treasury, md, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $10.1 million to KELLY SERVICES, INC.. SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KELLY SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of the Fiscal Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-04-01. End: 2007-09-30.

Was the Time and Materials pricing model the most cost-effective approach for these temporary staffing needs, or could a fixed-price contract have yielded better value?

The Time and Materials (T&M) model offers flexibility, which can be beneficial for unpredictable needs. However, it shifts cost risk to the government. Without detailed performance metrics and comparison to fixed-price bids for similar services, it's difficult to definitively state if it was the most cost-effective. Robust oversight is essential to manage T&M contracts effectively.

What specific procurement procedures were followed, and did they ensure adequate competition to achieve fair market prices for temporary staffing?

The provided data does not specify the procurement method beyond 'MD'. If this was not a full and open competition, the government may not have received the best possible pricing. Understanding the justification for any limited competition is key to assessing price discovery and taxpayer impact.

How effectively was the contract managed to ensure the services provided met the Bureau of the Fiscal Service's needs within the allocated budget?

Effective contract management for T&M involves diligent tracking of hours, rates, and materials, along with performance monitoring. The $10.1 million expenditure over 547 days suggests significant resource allocation. Assessing the quality of services rendered and adherence to budget requires access to performance reports and oversight documentation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesEmployment ServicesTemporary Help Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 999 WEST BIG BEAVER ROAD, TROY, MI, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,108,119

Exercised Options: $10,099,168

Current Obligation: $10,099,168

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: TPD03C0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-04-01

Current End Date: 2007-09-30

Potential End Date: 2007-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-11-29

More Contracts from Kelly Services, Inc.

View all Kelly Services, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending