DoD's $68M Contract for Aircraft Parts Awarded to Hamilton Sundstrand Amidst Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $68,285,064 ($68.3M)

Contractor: Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-02-27

End Date: 2021-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,311 days

Daily Burn Rate: $52.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: GENERATOR,DIRECT CU

Place of Performance

Location: WINDSOR LOCKS, HARTFORD County, CONNECTICUT, 06096

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $68.3 million to HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION for work described as: GENERATOR,DIRECT CU Key points: 1. Significant spending of $68.2M on aircraft parts. 2. Sole-source award to Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation raises competition concerns. 3. Contract duration of over three years (1311 days) suggests a substantial need. 4. The 'Other Aircraft Parts' NAICS code indicates a specialized manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award amount of $68.2M is substantial. Without a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar contracts for aircraft parts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer the best price.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition on this $68.2M contract may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these aircraft parts.

Public Impact

Military readiness may be impacted by the availability and cost of these essential aircraft parts. Taxpayers bear the financial burden of a contract awarded without competitive bidding. The defense sector's reliance on specific manufacturers can create vulnerabilities in supply chains.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, which is critical for maintaining military aviation capabilities. Spending benchmarks in this specialized area can vary widely based on the specific components and technologies involved.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded to Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation and does not specify any set-asides for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses is unclear, but they were likely not primary beneficiaries of this sole-source award.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential lack of robust oversight in the procurement process, as competitive bidding is a key mechanism for ensuring accountability and value for taxpayer money.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ct, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $68.3 million to HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION. GENERATOR,DIRECT CU

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $68.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-02-27. End: 2021-09-30.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of seeking competitive bids?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or a lack of available alternatives. Without specific documentation, it's impossible to determine the exact reason. However, such awards warrant scrutiny to ensure they are truly necessary and not a result of convenience or insufficient market research.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single supplier for critical aircraft parts over a multi-year period?

Relying on a single supplier for critical aircraft parts over several years poses risks such as price escalation, supply chain disruptions if the supplier faces issues, and a lack of innovation. It also reduces leverage for the government in negotiations, potentially leading to higher costs and less favorable terms.

How does the lack of competition on this $68.2M contract affect the overall cost-effectiveness for the Department of Defense?

The lack of competition directly impacts cost-effectiveness by removing the downward pressure on prices that a bidding process provides. This sole-source award means the government likely paid a premium, reducing the overall value for taxpayer dollars spent on these essential aircraft parts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ELECTRIC WIRE, POWER DISTRIB EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: SPRPA115RX506

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp (UEI: 001344142)

Address: 1 HAMILTON RD MAILSTOP 2-M-1-A, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT, 06096

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $68,285,064

Exercised Options: $68,285,064

Current Obligation: $68,285,064

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SPRPA113G001X

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline

Start Date: 2018-02-27

Current End Date: 2021-09-30

Potential End Date: 2021-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-01-23

More Contracts from Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation

View all Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending