DoD awards $457M contract for service establishment equipment and supplies to W S DARLEY & CO
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $78,143,234 ($78.1M)
Contractor: W S Darley & CO
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-09-08
End Date: 2027-07-22
Contract Duration: 682 days
Daily Burn Rate: $114.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 29
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 4569564285!FUNCTION MODULE
Place of Performance
Location: ITASCA, DUPAGE County, ILLINOIS, 60143
State: Illinois Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $78.1 million to W S DARLEY & CO for work described as: 4569564285!FUNCTION MODULE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a potentially competitive process. 2. The contract has a duration of 682 days, suggesting a medium-term need for the supplies. 3. The award amount of $456,956,428.75 represents a significant investment in essential equipment and supplies. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. The Defense Logistics Agency is the awarding agency, responsible for efficient logistics support. 6. The contract is for Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers, a critical category for military readiness.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total contract value is substantial at over $456 million. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for broad categories of 'Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies' is challenging without more specific product details. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost certainty for the government. The number of offers received (29) suggests a healthy level of interest and potential for competitive pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This solicitation method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the final award. The solicitation received 29 offers, indicating a robust level of interest from potential bidders. The exclusion of sources prior to the final award warrants further investigation to understand the rationale and its potential impact on the breadth of competition.
Taxpayer Impact: While 29 offers were received, the exclusion of certain sources could mean that taxpayers did not benefit from the lowest possible price that might have been achieved with unrestricted competition.
Public Impact
Military personnel and units requiring service establishment equipment and supplies will benefit from this contract. The contract ensures the availability of essential goods for various defense operations. The geographic impact is national, supporting defense logistics across the United States. The contract supports the wholesale merchant industry for specialized equipment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type needs clarification to ensure maximum taxpayer value.
- Lack of specific product details makes it difficult to assess value for money comprehensively.
- The contract duration and value could indicate potential for scope creep if not managed closely.
Positive Signals
- The high number of offers (29) suggests strong market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
- The firm fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government.
- Awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency, a specialized agency focused on efficient procurement.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the wholesale merchant category for specialized equipment and supplies, a segment of the broader defense logistics and industrial supply market. The defense sector relies heavily on such contracts to maintain operational readiness. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader categories of military equipment and supplies, where billions are spent annually to equip and sustain forces.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, the substantial value of the contract suggests potential opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors if such provisions are included in the prime contract's terms.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight mechanisms. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) has internal oversight processes for contract management and performance. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific performance metrics and detailed oversight reports may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Logistics Agency Procurement
- Military Equipment and Supplies
- Wholesale Merchant Services
- Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
Risk Flags
- Competition Type: 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' requires further investigation into the rationale for excluding sources.
- Scope Definition: The broad category of 'Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies' may lead to challenges in precise value benchmarking and performance monitoring.
- Contractor Performance History: Detailed public data on W S DARLEY & CO's past performance for similar large-scale contracts is not readily available.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, defense-logistics-agency, merchant-wholesalers, equipment-and-supplies, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, large-contract, national-us, service-establishment
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $78.1 million to W S DARLEY & CO. 4569564285!FUNCTION MODULE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is W S DARLEY & CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $78.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-08. End: 2027-07-22.
What is the specific nature of the 'Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies' being procured under this contract?
The provided data categorizes this contract under 'Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers.' This broad classification suggests the procurement of a wide range of items necessary for setting up or maintaining operational facilities and services. Examples could include tools, temporary structures, basic furniture, communication equipment, generators, and other logistical support items. Without a more detailed product list or Statement of Work, the exact nature remains general, making direct value comparisons difficult. However, the sheer volume and value indicate critical operational support needs for the Department of Defense.
How does the awarded price compare to historical spending for similar equipment and supplies by the Department of Defense?
Direct historical price comparisons for this specific contract are challenging without access to detailed historical procurement data for identical or highly similar items. The contract value of $456,956,428.75 is substantial. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) manages a vast portfolio of contracts, and this award represents a significant portion of their spending in the 'Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies' category. To perform a robust comparison, one would need to analyze DLA's spending trends over several fiscal years for comparable goods, considering factors like inflation, quantity variations, and specific item specifications. The number of offers (29) suggests a competitive market, which generally helps in achieving favorable pricing relative to market rates.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential supply chain disruptions, quality control issues with a broad range of goods, and the possibility of the contractor not meeting delivery schedules. Given the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award type, there's also a risk that the exclusion of certain bidders might have limited the competitive landscape, potentially impacting price. Mitigation strategies likely involve stringent contract terms, performance monitoring by the DLA, quality assurance inspections, and potentially backup suppliers or contingency plans outlined in the contract. The firm fixed-price structure also mitigates financial risk for the government regarding cost overruns.
What is the track record of W S DARLEY & CO in fulfilling similar government contracts?
W S DARLEY & CO has a history of receiving government contracts, particularly with defense agencies. Their past performance would be a critical factor considered during the source selection process for this award. A review of their contract history would reveal their experience in supplying equipment and supplies, their on-time delivery rates, and their record concerning quality and compliance. Agencies typically assess past performance to gauge a contractor's reliability and capability to meet the requirements of new contracts. Without specific performance data from prior contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess their track record here, but the award itself suggests a satisfactory past performance evaluation.
How does the competition level (29 offers) translate into value for taxpayers?
A high number of offers, such as the 29 received for this contract, generally indicates a competitive marketplace. This level of competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. For taxpayers, this means the government is more likely to secure goods and services at or near the lowest achievable market price. While the 'exclusion of sources' aspect needs further scrutiny, the overall breadth of bidders suggests that the government received a range of proposals, increasing the likelihood of a cost-effective outcome. This competitive pressure helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers › Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: FIRE/RESCUE/SAFETY; ENVIRO PROTECT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 29
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 325 SPRING LAKE DR, ITASCA, IL, 60143
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $78,143,234
Exercised Options: $78,143,234
Current Obligation: $78,143,234
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SPE8EJ21D1025
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-08
Current End Date: 2027-07-22
Potential End Date: 2027-07-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-23
More Contracts from W S Darley & CO
- 4560372610!modi II System — $108.2M (Department of Defense)
- 4564797281!mvpa II With Smart Filter — $53.9M (Department of Defense)
- 4563937081!model Defender Pouch KIT — $38.9M (Department of Defense)
- 4561216335!AF SFC Comm UTC V3.2 NO TIB — $31.1M (Department of Defense)
- 4569641853!secure Tactical Data Center Enclosure — $21.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)