DoD's $638M Defense Evaluation Support Contract Awarded to Engility Services, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $63,800,827 ($63.8M)
Contractor: Engility Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1996-11-01
End Date: 2003-12-31
Contract Duration: 2,616 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 199712!9700!0014!ZD93 !DEFENSE EVALUATION SUPPORT ACT !SEA99395C0008 !A!*!P00012 !19961101!20000922!069341972!803888320!042500934!N!4A457!TASC, INC !55 WALKERS BROOK DR !READING !MA!01867!69104!013!51!ROSSLYN !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !0001!+000000050000!N!N!000000000000!AZ15!RDTE/OTHER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT-ENG/MANUF DEVEL !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!C!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!003!B!* !Z!Y!Z!* !* !N!C!*!Z!Z!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: ANDOVER, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01810
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $63.8 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 199712!9700!0014!ZD93 !DEFENSE EVALUATION SUPPORT ACT !SEA99395C0008 !A!*!P00012 !19961101!20000922!069341972!803888320!042500934!N!4A457!TASC, INC !55 WALKERS BROOK DR !READING !MA!01867!69104!013!51!ROSSLYN !ARLING… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for R&D services, indicating a focus on advanced technological development. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust market for these services. 3. The contract's duration of over 7 years points to a long-term strategic need. 4. Small business participation was not reported, potentially missing opportunities for smaller firms.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $638 million over approximately 7 years suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking is difficult without specific deliverables, but the scale implies substantial R&D efforts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Full and open competition was employed, allowing multiple vendors to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to secure the most cost-effective solution for taxpayers, though the final cost is dependent on contract performance.
Public Impact
Supports critical defense research and development initiatives. Enhances national security through advanced technological capabilities. Potential for innovation in defense technologies. Long-term commitment to a specific contractor may limit future flexibility.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Cost-plus fixed fee structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Significant investment in R&D.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under 'RDTE/OTHER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT-ENG/MANUF DEVEL' within the Defense sector. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority but is also subject to budget fluctuations and evolving threats.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this contract award. This suggests that the prime contractor, Engility Services, LLC, is a large business, and opportunities for small businesses may have been limited.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, through the Defense Contract Management Agency, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight is crucial for cost control and ensuring deliverables meet requirements, especially with a cost-plus fixed fee structure.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost-plus fixed fee contract type can lead to cost overruns.
- Long contract duration may reduce flexibility.
- No reported small business participation.
- Potential for classified or sensitive R&D details limiting public insight.
Tags
department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $63.8 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC. 199712!9700!0014!ZD93 !DEFENSE EVALUATION SUPPORT ACT !SEA99395C0008 !A!*!P00012 !19961101!20000922!069341972!803888320!042500934!N!4A457!TASC, INC !55 WALKERS BROOK DR !READING !MA!01867!69104!013!51!ROSSLYN !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !0001!+000000050000!N!N!000000000000!AZ15!RDTE/OTHER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT-ENG/MANUF DEVEL !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!C!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!0
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $63.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1996-11-01. End: 2003-12-31.
What specific R&D projects were undertaken under this contract, and what were their key outcomes?
The contract focused on 'DEFENSE EVALUATION SUPPORT ACT' and 'RDTE/OTHER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT-ENG/MANUF DEVEL'. Specific project details are often classified or not publicly disclosed due to national security implications. However, the broad nature suggests support for advanced engineering, manufacturing development, and testing of defense systems.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure value for money given the cost-plus fixed fee structure?
While full and open competition is designed to foster value, the cost-plus fixed fee (CPFF) structure inherently carries risks of cost escalation if not rigorously managed. The effectiveness in ensuring value depends heavily on the government's oversight, the clarity of the fixed fee, and the contractor's efficiency in managing costs within the agreed-upon parameters.
What is the long-term strategic impact of awarding such a large R&D contract to a single entity for an extended period?
Awarding a large, long-term R&D contract to one entity can foster deep expertise and streamline development. However, it may also create vendor lock-in, potentially stifle broader innovation from other firms, and reduce flexibility if strategic priorities shift. Continuous evaluation is needed to ensure ongoing alignment with evolving defense needs.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Science Applications International Corporation (UEI: 078745061)
Address: 100 BRICKSTONE SQUARE, ANDOVER, MA, 01810
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 1996-11-01
Current End Date: 2003-12-31
Potential End Date: 2003-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-06-25
More Contracts from Engility Services, LLC
- 200602!600069!9700!hdtra1!defense Threat Reduction Agency !hdtra105d0003 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20051123!20061115!064677243!016435559!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Information T!7575 Colshire Drive !MC Lean !va!22102!48376!059!51!mclean !fairfax !virginia !+000013910591!n!n!000000000000!r421!technical Assistance !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!1!001!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $227.6M (Department of Defense)
- Army Rotc Functional Support — $165.8M (Department of Defense)
- Jitc Mission Contract — $163.0M (Department of Defense)
- LAW Enforcement Professional Program — $134.1M (Department of Defense)
- Jitc Mission Contract — $106.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)