State Department Awards $156M for Overseas Security Guards Amidst Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $156,081,320 ($156.1M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2007-03-26

End Date: 2010-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,376 days

Daily Burn Rate: $113.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Other

Official Description: OVERSEAS CONTRACT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $156.1 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: OVERSEAS CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $156 million for security services. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract awarded to domestic entities, with specific awardees undisclosed. 4. The service category is security guards and patrol services, critical for overseas operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is substantial, but without specific per-unit cost data or comparison points for similar overseas security contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult. The duration of the contract (over 3 years) also impacts the overall value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and can lead to better price discovery. However, the undisclosed domestic awardees limit transparency on the specific competitive landscape.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs. The $156 million awarded suggests significant taxpayer investment in overseas security.

Public Impact

Ensures security for personnel and assets in potentially high-risk overseas locations. Supports diplomatic missions and government operations abroad. Creates jobs within the domestic security services industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is vital for government operations, particularly in overseas contexts. Spending benchmarks for such contracts can vary widely based on location, threat level, and specific service requirements. This $156 million award falls within a significant range for large-scale security provisions.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded to domestic entities, the data does not specify if any small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of State is responsible for overseeing this contract. Accountability would involve monitoring service delivery, adherence to contract terms, and ensuring cost-effectiveness throughout the contract period. The duration suggests ongoing oversight is required.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

security-guards-and-patrol-services, department-of-state, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $156.1 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). OVERSEAS CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $156.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-03-26. End: 2010-12-31.

What specific metrics were used to evaluate the value for money in this security contract, given its long duration and overseas deployment?

Evaluating value for money in long-term overseas security contracts typically involves assessing factors beyond just the initial price. This includes the contractor's track record, the effectiveness of their security protocols, their ability to adapt to changing threats, and the total cost of ownership over the contract's life. Performance metrics, incident response times, and client satisfaction surveys are crucial for ongoing value assessment.

How does the risk profile of providing security guards and patrol services overseas compare to domestic operations, and what mitigation strategies are typically employed?

Overseas security operations carry a significantly higher risk profile due to geopolitical instability, varying legal frameworks, potential for direct threats, and logistical challenges. Mitigation strategies include rigorous personnel vetting, intelligence gathering, robust communication protocols, emergency response planning, and close coordination with local authorities and military forces. The contract likely includes specific clauses addressing these heightened risks.

What is the typical effectiveness rate for security guard and patrol services in high-threat overseas environments, and how is this measured?

Effectiveness is typically measured by the absence of security incidents (e.g., breaches, attacks, theft) and the successful deterrence of threats. Key performance indicators (KPIs) often include response times to alarms, patrol coverage adherence, and successful implementation of security plans. While a precise 'effectiveness rate' is hard to quantify universally, consistent performance against established security objectives and minimal incidents are indicators of success.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesInvestigation and Security ServicesSecurity Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $321,319,994

Exercised Options: $169,890,881

Current Obligation: $156,081,320

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-03-26

Current End Date: 2010-12-31

Potential End Date: 2010-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-09-03

More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →

Other Department of State Contracts

View all Department of State contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending