State Dept. Awards $59M for Overseas Facilities Support Services via Non-Competitive Delivery Order
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $59,235,046 ($59.2M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of State
Start Date: 2004-07-12
End Date: 2013-01-24
Contract Duration: 3,118 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.0K/day
Competition Type: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OVERSEAS CONTRACT
Plain-Language Summary
Department of State obligated $59.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: OVERSEAS CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $59.2M for facilities support. 2. Domestic awardees are undisclosed, limiting transparency. 3. Non-competitive award raises questions about price discovery and value. 4. Long contract duration (2004-2013) suggests a sustained need.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $59.2M is substantial for facilities support. Without knowing the specific services and comparing them to similar contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess value. The non-competitive nature further complicates a fair pricing assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This was a non-competitive delivery order, meaning there was no formal solicitation or bidding process. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive environment.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a competitive process, impacting taxpayer funds negatively.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competition. Lack of transparency regarding awardees hinders public scrutiny. Long-term nature of the contract suggests potential for sustained inefficiency if not properly managed.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Non-competitive award
- Undisclosed awardees
- Long contract duration
- Lack of transparency
Positive Signals
- Domestic awardees
- Firm Fixed Price contract type
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing maintenance, operation, and management of buildings and grounds. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on the scope and location of services. This contract's value is significant for this type of service.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates 'DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED)', providing no information on whether small businesses were involved or benefited from this contract. The lack of disclosure prevents any analysis of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The non-competitive nature of this award warrants further oversight to ensure the Department of State received fair value. The undisclosed awardees also present an accountability challenge.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of State Contracting
- Department of State Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition may have led to inflated prices.
- Undisclosed awardees reduce transparency and accountability.
- Long contract duration without clear competition raises concerns about sustained value.
- Potential for missed opportunities to engage small businesses.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-state, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of State awarded $59.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). OVERSEAS CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $59.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-07-12. End: 2013-01-24.
What specific facilities support services were provided under this contract, and how were they justified as a sole-source requirement?
The provided data lacks specifics on the services rendered. A sole-source justification would typically detail unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of market availability for the required services. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the necessity of a non-competitive award or the value received.
What was the rationale for awarding this contract non-competitively, and were any alternatives considered?
The data states it was a 'NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' but does not provide the underlying justification. Typically, such awards require a documented justification, such as urgency, lack of available sources, or specific technical requirements. The absence of this rationale makes it difficult to assess the risk of inflated pricing or missed opportunities for better value.
How was the pricing determined for this non-competitive contract to ensure fair and reasonable costs for the taxpayer?
With a non-competitive award, pricing is often determined through negotiation, historical data, or cost analysis. The 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' type suggests a negotiated price. However, without transparency into the negotiation process or cost breakdowns, it's challenging to independently verify if the $59.2M represented a fair market price or if taxpayers bore a premium due to the lack of competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $59,235,046
Exercised Options: $59,235,046
Current Obligation: $59,235,046
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SLMAQM04C0030
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-07-12
Current End Date: 2013-01-24
Potential End Date: 2013-01-24 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-09-03
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of State Contracts
- Care Logistical Support Services - Clss — $2.3B (Xator LLC)
- Task Order to Provide Project Management Support, Transition Support, Engineering and Design Support, Securing the Infrastructure Support and O&M Support for the Department's IT Consolidation Program — $2.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.)
- Slmaqm04c0030 — $1.2B (Dyncorp International LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.)