OPM's $50.8M INTEGIC BPA Call for IT services shows long-term IT support needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $50,872,576 ($50.9M)

Contractor: Integic

Awarding Agency: Office of Personnel Management

Start Date: 2006-09-30

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,461 days

Daily Burn Rate: $34.8K/day

Competition Type: FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: IT

Official Description: OPM INTEGIC BPA CALL

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20415

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Office of Personnel Management obligated $50.9 million to INTEGIC for work described as: OPM INTEGIC BPA CALL Key points: 1. This contract represents a significant, long-term investment in IT support, indicating a sustained need for these services. 2. The use of a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) suggests a flexible and efficient procurement method for ongoing IT requirements. 3. The contract's duration of approximately four years points to a stable, predictable IT service delivery model. 4. While the specific services are not detailed, the 'Computer and Software Stores' category implies a focus on IT infrastructure and related products. 5. The follow-on nature of this action suggests a successful prior relationship or a recognized need for continued support from INTEGIC.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific BPA Call is challenging without detailed service descriptions or comparable contract data. However, a $50.8 million spend over roughly four years averages to approximately $12.7 million annually. This figure needs to be assessed against the scope and complexity of the IT services provided. Without more granular data on the specific IT products and services procured, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money or compare pricing against market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data indicates this is a 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION,' which suggests the original BPA or a prior call under it was competed. However, the specific competition details for this particular call are not available. It's unclear if this call itself was competed, or if it was awarded directly to INTEGIC as a follow-on action based on the original competition. The level of competition for the initial BPA would be a key factor in understanding price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of clear competition data for this specific call makes it difficult to ascertain the direct impact on taxpayer value. If it was a sole-source follow-on, taxpayers may not have benefited from competitive pricing.

Public Impact

Federal employees across the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) likely benefit from reliable IT infrastructure and support, enabling efficient government operations. The contract supports the core IT functions of OPM, ensuring the availability and performance of essential computer systems and software. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where OPM's primary operations are located. This contract supports the IT workforce within INTEGIC and potentially subcontractors, contributing to employment in the technology sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed service scope makes it difficult to assess if the $50.8M spend represents optimal value for the IT support provided.
The 'Computer and Software Stores' classification is broad and may obscure the specific nature and cost-drivers of the IT services procured.
Limited transparency on the competition for this specific follow-on action hinders a full assessment of price reasonableness for taxpayers.

Positive Signals

The use of a BPA suggests an established, efficient procurement mechanism for ongoing IT needs.
The 'Follow On To Competed Action' designation implies that the initial procurement was subject to competition, potentially leading to better initial pricing.
The contract's substantial duration indicates a stable and reliable IT support arrangement for OPM.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically related to computer and software procurement and support. The IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with significant government spending allocated to maintaining and upgrading federal IT infrastructure. Benchmarking this $50.8 million BPA call requires comparison against similar IT support contracts awarded by agencies of OPM's size and scope, considering the specific technologies and services involved.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (sb) was false (false) for this contract. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or set-asides for small businesses. This suggests that the primary awardee, INTEGIC, is likely a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses within this specific BPA call may have been limited unless subcontracting was utilized without explicit reporting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) contracting officers and program managers. As a BPA call, it leverages an existing framework, implying that the initial BPA likely had established oversight mechanisms. Transparency is moderate, as BPA calls are generally reported, but detailed performance metrics and spending breakdowns are often not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

OPM IT Modernization Efforts
Federal Civilian Agency IT Support Contracts
IT Services Blanket Purchase Agreements
Computer Hardware and Software Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for cost escalation over the contract duration.
Risk of technological obsolescence if services are not regularly updated.
Limited transparency on specific services procured hinders value assessment.
Unclear competition level for this specific follow-on action.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Office of Personnel Management awarded $50.9 million to INTEGIC. OPM INTEGIC BPA CALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGIC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Office of Personnel Management (Office of Personnel Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $50.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2010-09-30.

What specific IT products and services were procured under this $50.8M INTEGIC BPA Call?

The provided data classifies this contract under NAICS code '541519 - Other Computer Related Services' and the Product Service Code (PSC) is not specified, but the description mentions 'Computer and Software Stores.' This suggests the contract likely encompassed a range of IT-related goods and services, potentially including hardware procurement, software licenses, IT consulting, system integration, and maintenance. However, without a more detailed statement of work or contract line item details, the precise nature and breakdown of services remain unspecified. The 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION' designation implies a continuation or expansion of services previously provided under the parent BPA.

How does the annual spending of approximately $12.7 million compare to similar IT support contracts for federal agencies of OPM's size?

Comparing the average annual spend of $12.7 million requires context regarding the scope and criticality of the IT services provided. OPM, as a central agency managing sensitive personnel data, has significant IT needs. Annual IT spending for civilian agencies can range widely, from a few million for smaller agencies to hundreds of millions for larger departments. For an agency like OPM, $12.7 million annually for a specific BPA call focused on computer and software stores could be considered moderate, assuming it covers essential hardware, software, and related support. However, a true benchmark would necessitate comparing it against contracts with similar service level agreements (SLAs), technology stacks, and user bases.

What is INTEGIC's track record with OPM and other federal agencies, particularly concerning IT services?

INTEGIC has a history of contracting with the federal government, including OPM. The fact that this is a 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION' suggests a prior successful engagement or a recognized capability. Analyzing INTEGIC's broader contract portfolio, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues, would provide further insight. Federal procurement data often includes past performance information, which agencies use to assess contractor reliability and quality. A review of publicly available contract databases and award histories would reveal the extent and nature of INTEGIC's work with OPM and other agencies in the IT domain.

What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration BPA call like this, and what mitigation strategies are typically employed?

Long-duration contracts, including BPA calls, carry risks such as scope creep, potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly, and technological obsolescence. If the initial competition was robust, price escalation clauses should be carefully monitored. Mitigation strategies typically involve strong contract management, regular performance reviews, clear change control processes, and periodic market research to ensure continued value. For OPM, ensuring that the IT solutions remain current and effective throughout the contract's life is crucial. The 'follow-on' nature also implies a risk of vendor lock-in if not managed proactively.

How has OPM's spending on IT services evolved over time, and does this contract represent a significant shift or continuation?

Without historical spending data specifically for OPM's IT services beyond this single BPA call, it's difficult to determine trends. However, the federal government, including OPM, has been increasingly focused on modernizing its IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, and data management. This contract, with its substantial value and duration, likely represents a significant component of OPM's ongoing IT strategy. The fact that it's a follow-on action suggests a continuation of a strategy or service delivery model that has proven effective or necessary. A broader analysis of OPM's IT budget and contract awards over several fiscal years would be needed to identify significant shifts or patterns.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Retail Trade › Electronics and Appliance Stores › Computer and Software Stores

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Titan II Inc. (UEI: 016435559)

Address: 14585 AVION PKWY, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $218,869,451

Exercised Options: $109,479,025

Current Obligation: $50,872,576

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: OPMBPA490400028

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline