OPM Spends $22.3M on INTEGIC BPA Call for Computer and Software Stores

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,291,949 ($22.3M)

Contractor: Integic

Awarding Agency: Office of Personnel Management

Start Date: 2006-09-27

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,464 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.2K/day

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: IT

Official Description: OPM INTEGIC BPA CALL

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20415

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Office of Personnel Management obligated $22.3 million to INTEGIC for work described as: OPM INTEGIC BPA CALL Key points: 1. Total spending reached $22.3 million over the contract's life. 2. The contract was awarded to INTEGIC. 3. The primary agency was the Office of Personnel Management. 4. The contract category was Computer and Software Stores. 5. This was a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $22.3 million for a BPA call is substantial. Without specific line-item data or comparison to similar procurements for computer and software stores, it's difficult to definitively assess value. The duration of the contract (1464 days) suggests ongoing needs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition method for this BPA call is not specified. If it was competed, the pricing discovery would be influenced by that process. If it was a sole-source BPA call, the pricing might be less competitive.

Taxpayer Impact: The impact on taxpayers is unclear without knowing the level of competition and the pricing achieved relative to market rates.

Public Impact

Federal employees rely on IT resources procured through such contracts. The availability of necessary software and computer hardware impacts agency operations. Taxpayer funds are allocated for these technology acquisitions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition details
Unclear value for money

Positive Signals

Supported agency operations
Procured necessary IT resources

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the IT sector, specifically the procurement of computer hardware and software. Spending benchmarks in this area can vary widely based on technology refresh cycles and agency-specific needs.

Small Business Impact

There is no information provided regarding the participation of small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business goals were met.

Oversight & Accountability

The Office of Personnel Management was responsible for overseeing this BPA call. The effectiveness of oversight is not detailed in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Computer and Software Stores
Office of Personnel Management Contracting
Office of Personnel Management Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed competition information
Unclear pricing justification
No performance metrics provided
Potential for uncompetitive pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Office of Personnel Management awarded $22.3 million to INTEGIC. OPM INTEGIC BPA CALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGIC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Office of Personnel Management (Office of Personnel Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-27. End: 2010-09-30.

What was the specific nature of the computer and software goods/services procured under this BPA call, and how did their pricing compare to market rates at the time of purchase?

The provided data does not specify the exact computer and software items. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of procured items and their unit costs would be necessary. Comparing these costs against contemporaneous market prices or similar government contracts would reveal if OPM achieved competitive pricing and maximized taxpayer value for the technology acquired.

What was the procurement strategy used for this BPA call, and did it foster adequate competition to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The procurement strategy for this BPA call is not detailed, making it impossible to assess the level of competition. If it was a full and open competition, it likely led to better price discovery. However, if it was a limited competition or sole-source action, the government may not have received the most advantageous pricing, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.

How effectively did this contract support the Office of Personnel Management's mission and operational needs, and what was the overall return on investment?

The data indicates the contract supported OPM's needs by providing computer and software resources over a significant period. However, without specific performance metrics or details on how these resources directly contributed to OPM's mission achievements, assessing the effectiveness and return on investment is challenging. A deeper dive into agency performance data linked to this procurement would be required.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Retail Trade › Electronics and Appliance Stores › Computer and Software Stores

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Titan II Inc. (UEI: 016435559)

Address: 14585 AVION PKWY, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $43,631,525

Exercised Options: $42,679,152

Current Obligation: $22,291,949

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: OPMBPA490400028

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline