NASA Awards $33.4M Construction Task Order to Roy Anderson Corp under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $33,445,403 ($33.4M)
Contractor: ROY Anderson Corp
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2009-04-07
End Date: 2012-06-22
Contract Duration: 1,172 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: A3 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION TASK ORDER NNS09AA75T
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $33.4 million to ROY ANDERSON CORP for work described as: A3 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION TASK ORDER NNS09AA75T Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $33.4 million for industrial building construction. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 1172 days suggests a substantial and complex project. 4. The contract is for industrial building construction, a key sector for infrastructure development.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $33.4 million appears reasonable for a large-scale industrial building construction project. Benchmarking against similar NASA construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment of its value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically leads to competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The multiple bids received (3) further support this.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, with pricing driven by market forces.
Public Impact
Supports NASA's infrastructure development and operational capabilities. Provides employment opportunities in Mississippi through Roy Anderson Corp. Contributes to the industrial construction sector's economic activity.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term construction projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor for project completion.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Clear contract duration and fixed-price type.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Industrial Building Construction sector, which is crucial for supporting various government agency operations. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs and modernization efforts.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Roy Anderson Corp, and it is not specified if they are a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), an agency with established oversight mechanisms. The fixed-price contract type provides some cost control, but ongoing monitoring of performance and adherence to schedule is essential.
Related Government Programs
- Industrial Building Construction
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases exposure to market volatility and potential scope creep.
- Fixed-price contracts can incentivize cutting corners if not properly monitored.
- Lack of detail on specific deliverables hinders full value assessment.
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise.
Tags
industrial-building-construction, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ms, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $33.4 million to ROY ANDERSON CORP. A3 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION TASK ORDER NNS09AA75T
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ROY ANDERSON CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $33.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-04-07. End: 2012-06-22.
What specific industrial facilities were constructed under this task order, and how do they align with NASA's strategic mission objectives?
The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the industrial facilities constructed. To assess alignment with NASA's mission, further details on the project scope would be required. Understanding if these facilities support research, launch operations, or administrative functions is key to evaluating their strategic importance and the value derived from this $33.4 million investment.
Were there any significant delays or cost adjustments during the 1172-day performance period, and how were they managed?
The data indicates a contract duration of 1172 days (approximately 3.2 years) with a firm fixed price. While this structure aims to limit cost increases, construction projects of this scale can face unforeseen challenges. Information regarding change orders, contract modifications, or performance issues would be necessary to assess risk management and potential impacts on the final cost and delivery timeline.
How did the pricing from the three competing bids compare, and what factors contributed to Roy Anderson Corp's selection as the most advantageous offer?
The data confirms three bids were received under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive environment. However, specific bid amounts and the evaluation criteria used to select Roy Anderson Corp are not detailed. Understanding the price differentials and the non-price factors (e.g., technical approach, past performance) considered would clarify how the government ensured the best value was obtained for the $33.4 million expenditure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNS09272021R
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Tutor Perini Corporation (UEI: 006954432)
Address: 11400 REICHOLD RD, GULFPORT, MS, 04
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $33,445,403
Exercised Options: $33,445,403
Current Obligation: $33,445,403
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNS09AA61B
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-04-07
Current End Date: 2012-06-22
Potential End Date: 2012-06-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-07-13
More Contracts from ROY Anderson Corp
- Design/Build for P-817 Auto Vehicle Training Shop, P-784 Disaster Recovery Training, P-826 Armory, P-783 Nctc Training Complex, P-781 Steel Workers Training, P-782 Builders Applied Instruction, P-810 Tactical Training Facility, P-816, Consolidated Professional DEV — $74.6M (Department of Defense)
- Construction of Visiting Qtrs — $63.3M (Department of Defense)
- Construction of Approximately 90,000 Gross Square Feet of SIX NEW Buildings Including Administration/Education, Dining, Vocation Shops, Recreation, Facilities Maintenance, and a Chiller Plant on an Area of Five Acres AT the Gulfport JOB Corps Center — $48.4M (Department of Labor)
- Ocean Science LAB, Stennis Space CTR — $47.1M (Department of Defense)
- - Renovation of Buildings 1&2 AT Vamc Biloxi MS — $44.1M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →