VA awards $44M for Biloxi VAMC building renovations, completed by Roy Anderson Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,067,533 ($44.1M)

Contractor: ROY Anderson Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2014-06-15

End Date: 2021-01-22

Contract Duration: 2,413 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF - RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS 1&2 AT VAMC BILOXI MS

Place of Performance

Location: BILOXI, HARRISON County, MISSISSIPPI, 39531

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $44.1 million to ROY ANDERSON CORP for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF - RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS 1&2 AT VAMC BILOXI MS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year renovation project of this scale. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. Project duration of over 6 years indicates potential for scope creep or extended execution. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, potentially impacting final cost if unforeseen issues arise. 5. The contract falls within the broad commercial and institutional building construction sector. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, suggesting larger firms were primary targets or participants.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $44 million for the renovation of two buildings at the VAMC Biloxi is within a reasonable range for large-scale construction projects. Benchmarking against similar renovation contracts for federal facilities would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an expectation of cost control, but the extended duration could indicate complexities or potential for cost overruns if not managed effectively. Without specific cost breakdowns or comparisons to similar projects, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the overall award amount is not inherently indicative of poor value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 11 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this project. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government. The number of bidders provides a good baseline for assessing the market's response to the solicitation.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process like this one typically benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces, ensuring the government receives a fair price for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Veterans receiving care at the Biloxi VAMC will benefit from improved facilities. The project delivers essential renovation and modernization services to federal healthcare infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in Biloxi, Mississippi, supporting local infrastructure. The construction activities likely involved a significant workforce, including skilled trades and project management personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Extended contract duration (over 6 years) may indicate project complexities or potential for delays.
Firm fixed-price contracts can sometimes lead to contractor claims if unforeseen issues arise during execution.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess project execution quality.
No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller contracting firms.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process and potential for competitive pricing.
The award was made to a single contractor, Roy Anderson Corp., indicating a clear line of responsibility.
The project addresses critical infrastructure needs for a VA medical center.
The contract was awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs, a key agency focused on veteran services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a broad category encompassing the building, alteration, and repair of nonresidential structures. The market for federal construction projects is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Veterans Affairs consistently investing in facility upgrades and new builds. Comparable spending benchmarks for federal building renovations can vary widely based on project scope, location, and complexity, but projects in the tens of millions of dollars are common for major facility overhauls.

Small Business Impact

The absence of a small business set-aside for this contract suggests that the procurement was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. This could mean that the project's scale or requirements favored larger contractors, or that the market analysis did not identify sufficient small business capacity. While this contract may not directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside, larger prime contractors often engage small businesses as subcontractors, potentially creating indirect opportunities within the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Veterans Affairs, as the awarding agency, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms would typically include contract administration, performance monitoring, and financial oversight to ensure compliance with terms and conditions. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General's office for the VA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

VA Medical Facility Construction
Federal Building Renovations
Commercial Construction Contracts
Department of Veterans Affairs Procurement

Risk Flags

Extended contract duration may indicate potential for delays or scope creep.
Firm fixed-price contracts can lead to claims if unforeseen issues arise.
Lack of detailed performance metrics limits assessment of execution quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $44.1 million to ROY ANDERSON CORP. IGF::OT::IGF - RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS 1&2 AT VAMC BILOXI MS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROY ANDERSON CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-06-15. End: 2021-01-22.

What was the specific scope of work for the renovation of Buildings 1 & 2 at VAMC Biloxi?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the renovation of Buildings 1 & 2 at VAMC Biloxi. However, given the contract value of approximately $44 million and the classification under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, it likely encompassed significant structural, mechanical, electrical, and architectural upgrades. This could include modernization of patient care areas, administrative spaces, utility systems, and potentially improvements to accessibility and safety features to meet current federal standards and enhance the functionality of the medical center.

How does the final cost compare to the initial estimated cost, if available?

The provided data does not include information on the initial estimated cost of the project, making a direct comparison to the final awarded amount of $44,067,533.11 impossible. To assess value for money, it would be necessary to obtain the original cost estimate and analyze any variances. Significant deviations could indicate issues with initial planning, scope changes, or unforeseen challenges during the contract execution period. Without this comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state if the final cost was aligned with expectations.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Roy Anderson Corp.'s performance on this contract. Typically, for construction projects of this nature, KPIs would include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, budget management, and responsiveness to change orders. A comprehensive performance review would involve assessing the contractor's success against these metrics throughout the contract duration. The absence of this information limits a thorough assessment of project execution effectiveness.

Were there any significant change orders or contract modifications issued during the contract period?

The provided data does not detail any specific change orders or contract modifications issued during the contract period for the renovation of Buildings 1 & 2 at VAMC Biloxi. The contract duration was approximately 2413 days (over 6 years), which is a substantial period during which changes are often necessary due to evolving requirements, unforeseen site conditions, or design adjustments. Information on modifications would be crucial for understanding the project's evolution and its impact on the final cost and schedule.

What is the historical spending pattern for building renovations at the VAMC Biloxi or similar VA facilities?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award of $44,067,533.11 for renovations at VAMC Biloxi. It does not offer historical spending patterns for this specific facility or comparable VA facilities. To establish such a pattern, one would need to analyze multiple contracts over several fiscal years, looking at the frequency, size, and types of renovation projects undertaken. This would help contextualize the current award within the VA's broader capital investment and maintenance strategies for its infrastructure.

What is the track record of Roy Anderson Corp. with federal construction contracts, particularly with the Department of Veterans Affairs?

The provided data indicates that Roy Anderson Corp. was awarded this $44 million contract by the Department of Veterans Affairs. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on other federal contracts, especially those with the VA. This would involve reviewing contract databases for previous awards, contract values, performance ratings, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A strong track record with the VA would suggest reliability and expertise in meeting federal construction requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP

Solicitation ID: VA101-13-R-0121

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tutor Perini Corporation

Address: 11400 REICHOLD RD, GULFPORT, MS, 39503

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,067,533

Exercised Options: $44,067,533

Current Obligation: $44,067,533

Actual Outlays: $2,902,184

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline