NASA awards $36.4M Oracle contract to CACI IDT, LLC for computer equipment and software
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $36,428,921 ($36.4M)
Contractor: CACI IDT, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2005-02-28
End Date: 2012-05-14
Contract Duration: 2,632 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.8K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 50
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: ORACLE AGREEMENT
Place of Performance
Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $36.4 million to CACI IDT, LLC for work described as: ORACLE AGREEMENT Key points: 1. Contract value of $36.4M over 7 years. 2. Awarded competitively, indicating potential for good pricing. 3. Focus on computer equipment and software suggests IT sector relevance. 4. No small business participation noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $36.4M over approximately 7 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar IT equipment and software contracts would be necessary for a precise pricing assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
Awarded as a competitive delivery order, this method allows for multiple vendors to bid, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Competitive procurement generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring fair market prices are sought and achieved.
Public Impact
Supports NASA's technological infrastructure needs. Ensures access to essential computer hardware and software. Long-term nature of the contract provides stability for IT services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Potential for vendor lock-in with Oracle products.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically for computer equipment and software. Spending benchmarks in this area are highly variable based on specific hardware and software requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This could be due to the specialized nature of the Oracle products or the prime contractor's strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by NASA, a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. The competitive nature of the award suggests a degree of accountability in the procurement process.
Related Government Programs
- Computer and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software Merchant Wholesalers
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in with Oracle.
- Lack of small business involvement.
- Long contract duration may not adapt to rapid tech changes.
- Dependence on a single vendor for critical IT components.
Tags
computer-and-computer-peripheral-equipme, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $36.4 million to CACI IDT, LLC. ORACLE AGREEMENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI IDT, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $36.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-02-28. End: 2012-05-14.
What specific Oracle products and services are included in this contract, and how do their costs compare to market rates?
The provided data does not specify the exact Oracle products or services. A detailed analysis would require reviewing the contract's statement of work to compare unit costs against industry benchmarks for similar software licenses, support, and hardware.
What were the key factors driving the competitive award, and did they result in significant cost savings compared to a sole-source scenario?
As a competitive delivery order, multiple vendors likely submitted proposals. The key factors would include technical capabilities, past performance, and price. The competitive nature suggests cost savings were achieved, but the exact savings amount requires comparison to a hypothetical sole-source bid.
How effectively does this contract support NASA's long-term IT modernization goals and ensure value for taxpayer money?
The contract's duration and focus on essential IT components suggest it supports ongoing operations. However, its effectiveness in modernization and long-term value depends on whether the procured solutions are adaptable, scalable, and align with NASA's evolving technological roadmap.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Professional and Commercial Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers › Computer and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 50
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 21445 BEAUMEADE CIR, ASHBURN, VA, 10
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $37,055,436
Exercised Options: $37,055,436
Current Obligation: $36,428,921
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS502147
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-02-28
Current End Date: 2012-05-14
Potential End Date: 2012-05-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-03-04
More Contracts from CACI IDT, LLC
- S19-0002 Information Technology Hardware Catalog 3 (ithc3)(base Year + 1 Year Option for IT Supplies and Accessories) — $103.0M (Department of Defense)
- S17-0226 Ithc (base Year) — $91.5M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $32.9M (Department of Justice)
- Call Order for Bigfix Software and Software Maintenance Issued Against US General Service Administration (GSA) Smartbuy Blanket Purchase Agreement, Gsq0009ae0011 and GSA Schedule 70 Contract Number Gs-35f-4153d — $30.2M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Elmr Hardware and Software — $22.6M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →