NASA's $9.3M contract for technical, administrative, and logistics support awarded to Alcyon Technical Services JV, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,339,136 ($9.3M)
Contractor: Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2015-11-04
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 3,891 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF - TECHNICAL INFORMATION, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICS SERVICES (TIALS 2) TO SUPPORT THE INSTITUTIONAL NEEDS OF NASA'S GLENN RESEARCH CENTER. MANAGEMENT TASK. MANAGEMENT SERVICES TASK
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $9.3 million to ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF - TECHNICAL INFORMATION, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICS SERVICES (TIALS 2) TO SUPPORT THE INSTITUTIONAL NEEDS OF NASA'S GLENN RESEARCH CENTER. MANAGEMENT TASK. MANAGEMENT SERVICES TASK Key points: 1. The contract aims to support the institutional needs of NASA's Glenn Research Center. 2. Services include technical information, administrative, and logistics support. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. The contract duration is substantial, spanning from November 2015 to June 2026. 5. The awarding agency is NASA, with the contract being managed by the same agency. 6. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 7. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 561210, pertaining to Facilities Support Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific performance metrics and a breakdown of services. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and that the fixed fee adequately compensates the contractor for their efforts without excessive profit. Comparing this to similar facilities support contracts at other NASA centers or government facilities would provide a better understanding of its value proposition. The total award amount of $9.3 million over approximately 11 years suggests a moderate annual spend.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This suggests that while the initial solicitation might have had some exclusions, the final award was made after a broad competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competition, which is beneficial for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging innovative solutions from multiple offerors.
Public Impact
NASA's Glenn Research Center benefits from continuous support for its institutional operations. The contract ensures the availability of technical information, administrative, and logistics services. This support is crucial for the smooth functioning and research activities at the Glenn Research Center. The contract's long duration provides stability for the contractor and ensures consistent service delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can incentivize contractors to incur costs, requiring strong government oversight to manage expenditures effectively.
- The long duration of the contract (over 10 years) may present challenges in adapting to evolving technological needs or changing institutional requirements without modifications.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's performance beyond contract adherence.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price.
- The contract provides essential support services, contributing to the operational efficiency of a key NASA research center.
- The long-term nature of the contract offers stability and predictability for both the agency and the contractor.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous companies offering specialized expertise. NASA, like other federal agencies, relies on such contracts to manage its extensive infrastructure and research facilities efficiently. Benchmarking this contract's value against similar facilities support contracts across government would require detailed analysis of scope and service levels.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC, is a joint venture, which may involve small business participation within its structure, but this is not explicitly detailed in the provided summary data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, rigorous financial oversight is essential to monitor expenditures and ensure that costs are reasonable and allocable to the contract. Performance monitoring would likely involve regular reviews of deliverables and service provision against contract requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting mechanisms, though specific public access to detailed performance data may vary.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Glenn Research Center Operations Support
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Administrative and Logistics Support Services
- Technical Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage potential cost escalations.
- Long contract duration may pose challenges for adapting to evolving needs without modifications.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data hinders detailed performance assessment.
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, ohio, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, logistics-support, administrative-support, technical-support, long-term-contract, joint-venture
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $9.3 million to ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF - TECHNICAL INFORMATION, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICS SERVICES (TIALS 2) TO SUPPORT THE INSTITUTIONAL NEEDS OF NASA'S GLENN RESEARCH CENTER. MANAGEMENT TASK. MANAGEMENT SERVICES TASK
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-11-04. End: 2026-06-30.
What is the historical spending trend for this specific contract (TIALS 2) since its inception?
The provided data indicates a total award amount of $9,339,135.86 for the TIALS 2 contract, with an end date of June 30, 2026. To determine the historical spending trend, one would need access to the contract's financial execution data from its start date (November 4, 2015) to the present. This would involve analyzing quarterly or annual expenditure reports to see how the funds have been drawn down over time. Factors influencing spending trends could include the phasing of services, specific task orders issued, and the contractor's billing cycles. Without access to these detailed financial reports, a precise historical spending trend cannot be established, only the total potential value over its lifespan.
How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts at other NASA centers?
A direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult without a detailed breakdown of the services provided and their associated unit costs within the TIALS 2 contract. Facilities support services can encompass a wide range of activities, from janitorial and groundskeeping to complex technical maintenance and administrative functions. To perform a meaningful comparison, one would need to identify comparable contracts at other NASA centers (e.g., Johnson Space Center, Kennedy Space Center) that offer a similar scope of services. Then, specific metrics like cost per square foot maintained, cost per employee supported, or cost per specialized service rendered would need to be extracted and standardized for a fair benchmark. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure also complicates direct per-unit comparisons as it focuses on reimbursing costs plus a fixed fee, rather than a pre-defined unit price.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC's performance under this contract?
The provided summary data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for a contract involving technical, administrative, and logistics support, KPIs might include metrics related to response times for service requests, completion rates of assigned tasks, adherence to safety protocols, accuracy in administrative processes, and overall client satisfaction surveys conducted by NASA Glenn Research Center. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure often relies on detailed performance work statements (PWS) and associated metrics to ensure the contractor meets defined standards. NASA's contract management team would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs and assessing ATS JV's performance against them throughout the contract period.
What is the track record of Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC with NASA and other federal agencies?
Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC, as a joint venture, likely brings together the capabilities of its constituent companies. To assess their track record, one would need to examine past performance information available through federal procurement databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). This would reveal their history of contract awards, performance ratings on previous government contracts, and any instances of contract disputes or terminations. Information on their experience with NASA specifically, and the types of services they have provided in the past, would be crucial in evaluating their suitability and reliability for the TIALS 2 contract.
Are there any identified risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this specific service requirement?
Yes, Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. The CPFF structure reimburses the contractor for allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This can incentivize the contractor to incur costs, as their profit is fixed regardless of the total cost. For NASA's TIALS 2 contract, the risk is that costs could escalate beyond initial projections if not rigorously monitored and controlled by the agency. Effective oversight, detailed cost accounting standards, and clear definitions of allowable costs are critical to mitigate this risk and ensure the government receives good value. The long duration of this contract amplifies the need for sustained vigilance in cost management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV LLC
Address: 4801 UNIVERSITY SQUARE STE 31, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35816
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,284,787
Exercised Options: $9,651,209
Current Obligation: $9,339,136
Actual Outlays: $4,713,215
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNC16CA11C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-11-04
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2027-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-30
More Contracts from Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC
- Systems Engineering Advanced Services (seas). Under This Contract, the Contractor Shall Provide Mission and Instrument Systems Engineering (m&ise) Services to the Mission Engineering&systems Analysis Division and Related Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate Organizations for the Formulation and Implementation of Flight and Ground Systems AS Well AS Development and Validation of NEW Technologies — $350.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- - Technical Information, Administrative, and Logistics Services (tials 2) to Support the Institutional Needs of Nasa's Glenn Research Center. Logistics Task — $140.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- - Technical Information, Administrative, and Logistics Services (tials 2) to Support the Institutional Needs of Nasa's Glenn Research Center. Administrative and Clerical Task — $72.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Tials 2 - Stock Purchases — $12.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →