NASA's $12.8M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Alcyon Technical Services JV
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,823,220 ($12.8M)
Contractor: Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2015-11-04
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 3,891 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF TIALS 2 - STOCK PURCHASES
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $12.8 million to ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF TIALS 2 - STOCK PURCHASES Key points: 1. The contract focuses on facilities support services, a critical component for operational efficiency. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market for these services. 3. The contract duration extends over several years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The pricing structure is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost control but requires careful oversight. 5. The specific services provided are essential for maintaining NASA's infrastructure. 6. The geographic location of service delivery is Ohio, impacting local workforce and economy.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
Benchmarking the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure requires detailed insight into the specific services rendered and the associated costs. Without granular data on labor hours, material costs, and the fixed fee percentage, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the pricing was deemed competitive by multiple bidders. Comparing this to similar facilities support contracts at other federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of whether the overall cost, including the fixed fee, represents a fair market value for the services provided.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' While the 'full and open' aspect indicates a broad solicitation, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests specific criteria or circumstances led to the narrowing of the pool of potential bidders. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competitive nature of the award implies that multiple companies vied for the contract, which generally aids in price discovery and achieving a more favorable outcome for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process, even with exclusions, aims to ensure that the government receives the best possible value by allowing a wide range of qualified contractors to bid, thereby driving down prices through market forces.
Public Impact
NASA facilities in Ohio will benefit from enhanced support services, ensuring operational continuity. The contract supports the maintenance and operation of critical infrastructure necessary for NASA's missions. The delivery of these services will likely create or sustain jobs within the Ohio region. The successful execution of this contract contributes to the overall efficiency and effectiveness of NASA's operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not rigorously managed.
- The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition may warrant further investigation to ensure no qualified small businesses were unduly excluded.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a healthy market and competitive pricing.
- Long contract duration suggests a stable and reliable service provider for NASA's ongoing needs.
- Focus on facilities support is essential for maintaining operational readiness.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a diverse range of companies, from large corporations to specialized small businesses, offering services essential for the functioning of government agencies and private enterprises. The market size for federal facilities support services is substantial, driven by the government's extensive real estate portfolio. This contract represents a specific instance of federal spending within this vital sector, contributing to the overall economic activity and employment within the industry.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals detailed in the award, it is difficult to assess the extent to which small businesses will participate. Agencies are encouraged to maximize small business participation, and it would be beneficial to understand if Alcyon Technical Services JV, LLC has a history of engaging small businesses as subcontractors for similar contracts.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, rigorous financial oversight is crucial to monitor expenditures and ensure the fixed fee is justified. NASA's internal procurement and program management offices would be responsible for performance monitoring, invoice review, and ensuring compliance with contract terms. The Inspector General's office at NASA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Federal Facilities Support Services
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules for Facilities Management
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage costs.
- Potential for contractor complacency due to long contract duration.
- Need to verify if small business subcontracting opportunities are being maximized.
Tags
facilities-support, nasa, ohio, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, delivery-order, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, long-term-contract, operational-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $12.8 million to ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF TIALS 2 - STOCK PURCHASES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-11-04. End: 2026-06-30.
What is the specific nature of the facilities support services provided under this contract?
The contract, identified by NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services), likely encompasses a range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of NASA facilities. These typically include, but are not limited to, building operations and maintenance, custodial services, grounds maintenance, pest control, security services, and potentially specialized technical support for facility systems. The exact scope would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). Given the agency (NASA), these services are critical for ensuring the safety, security, and operational readiness of research centers, administrative buildings, and other infrastructure vital to the agency's mission.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar services?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined at the outset or involves a high degree of uncertainty, as might be the case with complex facilities support. It allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee, representing profit. Compared to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts, CPFF offers more flexibility but carries a higher risk of cost growth for the government if not managed diligently. Compared to Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), CPFF does not directly incentivize cost savings beyond the initial cost control efforts. For routine facilities maintenance, FFP might be preferred for predictability, but for evolving or complex support needs, CPFF can be appropriate if robust oversight is in place.
What are the potential risks associated with a multi-year contract for facilities support services?
Multi-year contracts for facilities support services, like this one extending to 2026, present several potential risks. Firstly, there's the risk of price escalation over the contract's life, especially if the fixed fee or cost assumptions were based on earlier market conditions. Secondly, the government might become locked into a provider whose performance or capabilities degrade over time, making it difficult to switch without significant disruption. Thirdly, technological advancements or changes in service requirements might render the contracted services less optimal, but the long-term commitment could hinder adaptation. Finally, there's the risk of contractor complacency due to the extended duration, potentially impacting service quality if performance metrics are not consistently enforced.
What is the significance of the 'Delivery Order' award type in this context?
The 'Delivery Order' (aw: DELIVERY ORDER) indicates that this contract is likely a task order or delivery order issued under a larger indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar multiple-award contract vehicle. This means that while Alcyon Technical Services JV, LLC has been awarded a contract, specific services and their quantities are ordered incrementally over the contract period. This approach provides flexibility for the agency to order services as needed, rather than committing to a fixed quantity upfront. It is a common method for procuring services that have fluctuating demand or require phased implementation.
How does the geographic location (Ohio) influence the contract's impact?
The contract's performance is geographically tied to Ohio (st: OHIO, sn: OHIO). This means the primary economic impact, such as job creation and local spending, will be concentrated within that state. NASA facilities located in Ohio will receive the support services. The selection of a contractor based in or operating within Ohio could also leverage local expertise and supply chains. Conversely, if the contractor is not local, it may involve travel and logistical costs, which would be factored into the overall contract cost. The specific NASA facilities in Ohio that will receive these services are not detailed here but are crucial to the agency's operations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV LLC
Address: 4801 UNIVERSITY SQUARE STE 31, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35816
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,419,487
Exercised Options: $13,419,487
Current Obligation: $12,823,220
Actual Outlays: $6,885,675
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNC16CA11C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-11-04
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2027-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-30
More Contracts from Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC
- Systems Engineering Advanced Services (seas). Under This Contract, the Contractor Shall Provide Mission and Instrument Systems Engineering (m&ise) Services to the Mission Engineering&systems Analysis Division and Related Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate Organizations for the Formulation and Implementation of Flight and Ground Systems AS Well AS Development and Validation of NEW Technologies — $350.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- - Technical Information, Administrative, and Logistics Services (tials 2) to Support the Institutional Needs of Nasa's Glenn Research Center. Logistics Task — $140.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- - Technical Information, Administrative, and Logistics Services (tials 2) to Support the Institutional Needs of Nasa's Glenn Research Center. Administrative and Clerical Task — $72.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- - Technical Information, Administrative, and Logistics Services (tials 2) to Support the Institutional Needs of Nasa's Glenn Research Center. Management Task. Management Services Task — $9.3M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Alcyon Technical Services (ATS) JV, LLC federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →