NASA's $22M Occupational Health Contract Awarded to Consolidated Safety Services Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,059,299 ($22.1M)
Contractor: Consolidated Safety Services Incorporated
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2006-02-08
End Date: 2013-08-31
Contract Duration: 2,761 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, INDUSTRIAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $22.1 million to CONSOLIDATED SAFETY SERVICES INCORPORATED for work described as: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, INDUSTRIAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Consolidated Safety Services Inc. for $22.06 million. 2. The contract falls under Facilities Support Services, with a specific NAICS code of 561210. 3. Awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', suggesting a complex procurement process. 4. The contract type is 'Cost Plus Award Fee' (CPAF), which can incentivize performance but requires careful oversight. 5. This spending is within the broader context of government facilities support services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for potential cost overruns if performance targets are not met or are exceeded. Benchmarking this specific service is difficult without more granular data on the scope of occupational health services provided.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates a competitive process but with specific criteria that may have limited the pool of eligible bidders. This method aims for competition while ensuring specialized needs are met.
Taxpayer Impact: The $22.06 million expenditure represents taxpayer funds allocated for essential occupational health services at NASA facilities.
Public Impact
Ensures the health and safety of NASA personnel working in potentially hazardous environments. Supports the operational continuity of NASA's research and development activities. Contributes to NASA's compliance with federal health and safety regulations. The long duration of the contract (over 7 years) suggests a stable, ongoing need for these services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts require robust monitoring to ensure value for money.
- The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause warrants scrutiny to confirm it was justified and did not unduly restrict competition.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical occupational health needs for a major federal agency.
- Long contract duration indicates a sustained requirement and potential for stable service delivery.
- Competition, even with exclusions, suggests an effort to obtain competitive pricing.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing a range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. Spending in this sector is generally stable, driven by agency operational needs.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or subcontracted.
Oversight & Accountability
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitates strong oversight from NASA to ensure performance targets are met and costs are managed effectively. Regular reviews and audits are crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Limited competition due to 'Exclusion of Sources'.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Long contract duration may indicate a lack of innovation or market shifts not being incorporated.
Tags
facilities-support-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $22.1 million to CONSOLIDATED SAFETY SERVICES INCORPORATED. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, INDUSTRIAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CONSOLIDATED SAFETY SERVICES INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-02-08. End: 2013-08-31.
What specific occupational health services were included in this contract, and how do they align with NASA's mission needs?
The contract covers occupational health, industrial health, and medical services. These are crucial for ensuring the safety and well-being of personnel engaged in complex and potentially hazardous scientific research and space exploration activities. The services likely include medical surveillance, health hazard assessments, and emergency medical support, directly contributing to NASA's ability to conduct its operations safely and effectively.
What were the key factors driving the 'Exclusion of Sources' in this full and open competition, and did it impact the final price?
The 'Exclusion of Sources' typically occurs when specific technical capabilities, past performance, or unique requirements necessitate limiting the pool of potential offerors. For this contract, it might have been due to specialized medical expertise or existing infrastructure required for NASA's unique operational environment. While aiming for competition, such exclusions can sometimes limit price discovery compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
How effectively did the Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivize Consolidated Safety Services Inc. to deliver high-quality occupational health services within budget?
The effectiveness of a CPAF contract hinges on the clarity and achievability of the award fee criteria and the rigor of NASA's performance monitoring. If well-defined, these criteria can drive superior performance. However, CPAF also carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not managed closely. Without post-award performance reviews, it's difficult to definitively assess the incentive effectiveness and overall value achieved.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10301 DEMOCRACY LN STE 300, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $33,532,334
Exercised Options: $33,532,334
Current Obligation: $22,059,299
Actual Outlays: $105,391
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-02-08
Current End Date: 2013-08-31
Potential End Date: 2013-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-05-15
More Contracts from Consolidated Safety Services Incorporated
- THE Nesdis Ncei Seeks Expertise in Scientific Data Stewardship, Product Development, and User Engagement Services in Support of Ncei's Science Enterprise Specifically Related to the Inflation Reduction ACT (IRA) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure — $23.3M (Department of Commerce)
- This Action Formally Executes the Verbal Task Order Issued on 3/2/2021 Under This Contract and the Subsequent Modifications, Issued on 3/17/2021 and 3/26/2021 in Accordance With Contract Clauses Epaar 1552.216-72 Ordering-By Designated Ordering Offic — $18.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Life Science, Administrative and Technical Support for the National Ocean Service, Noaa — $14.4M (Department of Commerce)
- Ncei Science Support — $13.4M (Department of Commerce)
- Scientific and Technical Support Services for MSE — $8.0M (Department of Commerce)
View all Consolidated Safety Services Incorporated federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →