DoD Awards $13.1M for 4969 SSEE Installations to M. C. Dean, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,127,004 ($13.1M)

Contractor: M. C. Dean, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-05-04

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,184 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 4969 SSEE INSTALLATIONS

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.1 million to M. C. DEAN, INC. for work described as: 4969 SSEE INSTALLATIONS Key points: 1. The contract value is $13.1 million for 4969 SSEE installations. 2. M. C. Dean, Inc. secured the award through full and open competition. 3. The contract is for Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing structure. 4. The duration of the contract is 1184 days, ending July 31, 2026.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract is a Delivery Order with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure. Pricing will be assessed based on the fixed fee negotiated against the estimated cost for the 4969 SSEE installations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to yield fair market value for the engineering services provided, benefiting taxpayers.

Public Impact

Ensures critical SSEE installations are completed, enhancing defense infrastructure. Supports the Department of the Navy's operational capabilities. The competitive award suggests efficient use of taxpayer funds.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
The specific nature of SSEE installations may require specialized expertise, potentially limiting future competition.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
Clear delivery order with defined end date provides schedule certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Engineering Services, a sector crucial for defense infrastructure development and maintenance. Benchmarks for similar large-scale installation projects would typically consider complexity, labor rates, and material costs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and the awardee is not listed as a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to participate as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense's contracting process includes oversight mechanisms to ensure contract performance and financial accountability. Regular reviews of cost-plus fixed-fee contracts are essential to manage expenditures effectively.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
Potential for cost overruns.
Limited information on subcontractor participation.
Complexity of SSEE installations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.1 million to M. C. DEAN, INC.. 4969 SSEE INSTALLATIONS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M. C. DEAN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-05-04. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the estimated cost basis for the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar engineering services?

The provided data does not specify the estimated cost basis for the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure. CPFF contracts involve reimbursing the contractor for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. To assess value, this estimated cost would need to be compared against historical data for similar SSEE installations and engineering services, considering factors like labor, materials, and overhead, to determine if the overall price is competitive.

What are the specific risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing model in this context, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risk with CPFF is the potential for cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs incurred. This can incentivize less cost-conscious behavior. Mitigation strategies typically include robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking, clear definition of allowable costs, and strong negotiation of the fixed fee based on realistic cost estimates. The government must actively monitor expenditures to ensure efficiency.

How effective is the full and open competition process in ensuring the best value for taxpayer dollars on complex engineering projects like SSEE installations?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring best value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. For complex projects like SSEE installations, it allows a wider range of qualified contractors to bid, increasing the likelihood of selecting a proposal that offers superior technical solutions at a competitive price. However, effectiveness also depends on the clarity of the solicitation and the government's ability to evaluate proposals comprehensively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT › INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1765 GREENSBORO STATION PLACE SUITE 1400, TYSONS, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,273,169

Exercised Options: $13,127,004

Current Obligation: $13,127,004

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 42

Total Subaward Amount: $2,908,577

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0003919D0022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline