Defense Base Services LLC awarded $28.6M for facilities support at NAS Fallon, NV

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,574,631 ($28.6M)

Contractor: Defense Base Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-10-01

End Date: 2025-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $78.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OBLIGATE OY7 FUNDING IAW P00094 AT NAS FALLON, NV

Place of Performance

Location: FALLON, CHURCHILL County, NEVADA, 89406

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.6 million to DEFENSE BASE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: OBLIGATE OY7 FUNDING IAW P00094 AT NAS FALLON, NV Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year facilities support agreement. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. No immediate risk indicators are apparent from the contract details. 4. Performance period is standard for this type of service contract. 5. This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector. 6. The awardee, Defense Base Services, LLC, is a new entity in federal contracting. 7. The contract is firm fixed price, providing cost certainty.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $28.6 million for a one-year period of performance for facilities support services at NAS Fallon, NV, appears to be within a reasonable range for similar base support contracts. Benchmarking against other Department of Defense facilities support contracts of comparable scope and duration would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which typically indicates that the solicitation was broadly advertised and multiple bids were considered. The specific details of how many bids were received and the evaluation process are not provided, but the designation suggests a robust competitive environment. This approach is intended to ensure the government receives the best value through market forces.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally leads to more competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayers by ensuring funds are used efficiently and cost-effectively.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel stationed at Naval Air Station Fallon, NV, who rely on these services for operational readiness. Services delivered include a range of facilities support functions essential for base operations. The geographic impact is localized to Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sectors, potentially benefiting the local Nevada workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

New contractor: Defense Base Services, LLC's track record with the federal government is not yet established, requiring close monitoring of performance.
Scope definition: Clarity on the exact scope of 'facilities support services' is crucial for performance evaluation.

Positive Signals

Competitive award: The 'full and open competition' process suggests a potentially well-priced contract.
Firm Fixed Price: This contract type offers cost predictability for the government.
Defined performance period: The contract has a clear start and end date, facilitating management.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services is a broad category within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract likely encompasses a range of services such as maintenance, repair, janitorial, groundskeeping, and potentially specialized support for military installations. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous providers ranging from large corporations to smaller specialized firms. Spending in this category is significant across the federal government, supporting the operational infrastructure of various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a specific set-aside criterion for this award (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is Defense Base Services, LLC, it is important to ascertain if they have a subcontracting plan that includes small businesses. The absence of a set-aside does not preclude subcontracting opportunities, but it means they were not mandated from the outset.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Navy contracting command. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Logistics and Support Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Naval Air Station Operations

Risk Flags

New Contractor Performance Risk
Scope Definition Ambiguity Risk
Potential for Quality Degradation under FFP

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.6 million to DEFENSE BASE SERVICES, LLC. OBLIGATE OY7 FUNDING IAW P00094 AT NAS FALLON, NV

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DEFENSE BASE SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.

What is the track record of Defense Base Services, LLC with federal contracts?

Based on the provided data, Defense Base Services, LLC appears to be a relatively new entity in the federal contracting space. The contract award details do not indicate a significant history of prior federal awards for this specific company. As such, its past performance record with the government is not well-established. Future performance will be critical in assessing its reliability and capability to fulfill the requirements of this facilities support contract at NAS Fallon. Agencies typically rely on past performance evaluations as a key factor in future source selections, so building a positive track record on this contract will be important for the company.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar facilities support contracts?

The awarded amount of $28.6 million for a one-year firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support services at NAS Fallon, NV, needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts to assess value for money. Similar contracts for base operations support or facilities management at other naval installations or comparable military bases of similar size and scope would serve as a relevant comparison. Factors such as the specific services included (e.g., janitorial, maintenance, groundskeeping, pest control), geographic location (which can influence labor costs), and contract duration are crucial for a fair comparison. Without access to a database of comparable contract values, it is difficult to definitively state if this award represents excellent or fair value, but it falls within a typical range for such services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues from a new contractor, Defense Base Services, LLC, which lacks an extensive federal performance history. There is also a risk related to the precise definition and scope of 'facilities support services,' which could lead to disputes over deliverables or quality. Furthermore, unforeseen infrastructure issues at NAS Fallon could necessitate additional work not fully captured in the initial scope, potentially leading to change orders if not managed carefully. The firm-fixed-price nature, while beneficial for cost control, could also incentivize the contractor to cut corners on quality if not adequately monitored.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' process in ensuring value for this contract?

The 'full and open competition' process is generally considered a highly effective mechanism for ensuring value for government contracts. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. For this facilities support contract at NAS Fallon, this process suggests that multiple companies vied for the opportunity, leading to a price that reflects market conditions. The effectiveness is further enhanced if the evaluation criteria were clearly defined and rigorously applied, ensuring the lowest price technically acceptable or the best value was selected, rather than solely the lowest bid.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support at NAS Fallon?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support at NAS Fallon are not detailed in the provided data. To understand this, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded for similar services at this specific installation. Examining previous contract values, durations, awardees, and competition levels over several fiscal years would reveal trends in spending, identify any significant increases or decreases, and highlight whether the support services have consistently been competed or awarded through other means. This historical context is vital for assessing the current award's value and identifying potential anomalies or efficiencies.

What are the implications of the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type for cost management?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally favored by the government for services where the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For this facilities support contract, FFP means the contractor assumes most of the risk for cost overruns. This provides the government with cost certainty, as the price is fixed regardless of the contractor's actual costs. However, it can incentivize the contractor to minimize costs, potentially impacting quality if not managed through robust performance monitoring and quality assurance. Conversely, if the scope is underestimated by the contractor, they may seek to reduce service levels or quality to maintain profitability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6247316R1018

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 1200, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,574,631

Exercised Options: $28,574,631

Current Obligation: $28,574,631

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 14

Total Subaward Amount: $2,687,705

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247317D3809

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline