DoD awards $27.4M for facilities support at NAS Fallon, NV to Defense Base Services, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,433,026 ($27.4M)
Contractor: Defense Base Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-10-17
End Date: 2023-09-30
Contract Duration: 348 days
Daily Burn Rate: $78.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: OBLIGATE OPTION PERIOD 5 FUNDING AT NAS FALLON, NV
Place of Performance
Location: FALLON, CHURCHILL County, NEVADA, 89496
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.4 million to DEFENSE BASE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: OBLIGATE OPTION PERIOD 5 FUNDING AT NAS FALLON, NV Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical naval infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this service. 3. Performance context is crucial for ensuring operational readiness at a key naval air station. 4. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader facilities management and base operations support. 5. Risk indicators may include contractor performance history and the complexity of base operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $27.4 million for one year of facilities support services at NAS Fallon appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar large-scale base operations contracts. While specific per-unit cost data is not provided, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation. Further analysis would involve comparing the scope of services to other DoD base support contracts to ascertain if the pricing is competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors were likely solicited and allowed to bid. The specific mention of 'after exclusion of sources' suggests a potential initial phase where certain sources were excluded, but the final award was made through a broad competitive process. This approach generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best value by allowing a wide range of contractors to compete, driving down costs through market forces.
Public Impact
Naval Air Station Fallon personnel and operations benefit from reliable facilities support. Services include a range of facility maintenance and operational support functions. Geographic impact is concentrated at NAS Fallon, Nevada, a critical training facility. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for support staff at the base.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs without proper change order management.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical base support functions introduces operational risk.
- Ensuring consistent service quality across all facilities support areas requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Award to a single contractor can lead to streamlined operations and clear lines of accountability.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition generally leads to better pricing and service quality.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of the broader defense infrastructure support market. This sector encompasses a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities, including base operations, maintenance, repair, and custodial services. The market is characterized by large contracts awarded to specialized service providers, often through competitive bidding processes to ensure value for taxpayer money.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific award (ss: false, sb: false). While Defense Base Services, LLC may utilize small businesses for subcontracting, the primary award was not designated as a small business set-aside. This means opportunities for small businesses would likely stem from subcontracting agreements rather than direct prime contracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices at NAS Fallon. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, performance work statements, and regular performance reviews. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific day-to-day operational oversight details are internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Air Station Operations Support
- Base Operations Support Services
- Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Defense Infrastructure Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep
- Contractor performance variability
- Dependence on single source for critical services
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, nevada, nas-fallon, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.4 million to DEFENSE BASE SERVICES, LLC. OBLIGATE OPTION PERIOD 5 FUNDING AT NAS FALLON, NV
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DEFENSE BASE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-10-17. End: 2023-09-30.
What is the track record of Defense Base Services, LLC in performing similar facilities support contracts for the Department of Defense?
Defense Base Services, LLC has a history of performing base operations and facilities support services for the Department of Defense. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including contract values, duration, and any reported performance issues or awards, would provide a clearer picture of their capabilities and reliability. Information from contract databases and performance assessment reports (e.g., CPARS) would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment. A review of their contract history can indicate their experience with the scale and complexity of services required at a major naval installation like NAS Fallon.
How does the awarded amount compare to historical spending on facilities support at NAS Fallon?
To assess this, one would need to examine historical contract data for facilities support services specifically at NAS Fallon over previous years. This would involve identifying contracts with similar scopes of work and comparing their awarded values to the current $27.4 million obligation. Factors such as inflation, changes in service requirements, and the number of years covered by previous contracts would need to be considered for a fair comparison. Significant deviations from historical spending patterns could warrant further investigation into the reasons for the change, such as increased operational tempo or new infrastructure requirements.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this facilities support contract?
Key performance indicators for a facilities support contract typically revolve around service availability, response times, quality of maintenance, safety compliance, and cost control. For NAS Fallon, specific KPIs might include response times for facility repairs, uptime percentages for critical systems (e.g., HVAC, power), adherence to safety protocols during maintenance activities, and successful completion of scheduled preventative maintenance tasks. The contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) would detail these KPIs and the metrics used to evaluate the contractor's performance, often tied to payment or award fee structures.
Are there any specific risks associated with the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award type?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award type can introduce specific risks. While it aims for broad competition, the initial exclusion of sources might limit the pool of potential bidders, potentially impacting the competitiveness of the final bids. It could also raise questions about the justification for excluding certain sources, potentially leading to protests or perceptions of unfairness if not properly documented and justified. Ensuring that the exclusion criteria were objective, relevant, and applied consistently is crucial to mitigate these risks and maintain the integrity of the procurement process.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the local economy in Nevada, particularly around NAS Fallon?
This $27.4 million contract is likely to have a positive impact on the local economy in Nevada, particularly in the Fallon area. Defense Base Services, LLC, as the prime contractor, will likely hire local personnel to perform many of the required services, creating jobs. Additionally, the company may procure goods and services from local businesses to support its operations, further stimulating economic activity. The presence of a significant federal contract also contributes to the stability and growth of businesses that cater to military installations and their personnel.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6247316R1018
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation
Address: 3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 1200, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,433,026
Exercised Options: $27,433,026
Current Obligation: $27,433,026
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 23
Total Subaward Amount: $2,465,136
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247317D3809
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-10-17
Current End Date: 2023-09-30
Potential End Date: 2023-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-06-01
More Contracts from Defense Base Services, LLC
- Obligate OY7 Funding IAW P00094 AT NAS Fallon, NV — $28.6M (Department of Defense)
- Obligate OY6 Funding IAW P00082 AT NAS Fallon, NV — $28.2M (Department of Defense)
- Title: Base Operation Support Services (boss) for Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) — $25.1M (Department of the Interior)
- Base Operation Support Services for Midway Atoll NWR — $22.9M (Department of the Interior)
- Obligate Option Period 8 Funding IAW P00102 — $11.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)