DoD's $5.36M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Akima Facilities Operations LLC for FY26

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,361,719 ($5.4M)

Contractor: Akima Facilities Operations LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2026-02-01

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY26 FUNDING, OY 6

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $5.4 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC for work described as: FY26 FUNDING, OY 6 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical Department of Defense infrastructure. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The duration of the contract is one year, allowing for regular performance reviews and potential adjustments. 5. This contract falls under facilities support services, a broad category essential for operational readiness. 6. The geographic location in Virginia is a key hub for naval operations, underscoring the strategic importance of these services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the value of this $5.36 million contract requires comparison to similar facilities support services contracts within the Department of Defense and across government agencies. Given the fixed-price nature, the government has established a clear cost expectation. The specific services rendered and the scope of facilities managed will be critical factors in determining true value for money. Without detailed performance metrics and a breakdown of services, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the competitive award suggests a reasonable price point was achieved.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on predefined criteria. This suggests a robust competitive process was intended, aiming to solicit offers from a wide range of qualified contractors. The number of bidders and the specific reasons for any exclusions would provide further insight into the level of competition and its impact on pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation. This approach ensures that the government secures the best possible value by considering all eligible offerors.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from the continuity of essential facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. This contract supports the maintenance and upkeep of critical infrastructure, likely including buildings, grounds, and utilities. The services are geographically concentrated in Virginia, a region with significant naval installations and operations. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector, contributing to the local and regional economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if service requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities operations could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent service quality across all contracted facilities requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract duration allows for performance evaluation and potential for renewal based on satisfactory service.
Akima Facilities Operations LLC's experience in government contracting is a positive indicator of capability.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services from building maintenance and operations to groundskeeping and utility management. The total government spending in this sector is substantial, reflecting the ongoing need to maintain federal infrastructure. This contract with the Department of the Navy fits within this broader category, addressing the operational needs of naval facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per-square-foot maintenance costs or contract values for similar facility types and sizes.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses indicated in the provided data. The award to Akima Facilities Operations LLC, a larger entity, suggests that the primary focus was on securing comprehensive facilities support services. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Akima utilizes small businesses as subcontractors, which is not explicitly detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance work statement (PWS), outlining specific deliverables and service level agreements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Naval Base Operations Support
Government Facilities Management Contracts
Base Operations Support Services (BOSS)
Federal Building Operations and Maintenance

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues if contractor resources are overstretched.
Risk of cost increases impacting contractor profitability under fixed-price terms.
Dependence on contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $5.4 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC. FY26 FUNDING, OY 6

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-02-01. End: 2027-01-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at this specific naval installation or within the Department of the Navy?

Analyzing historical spending for facilities support services at this specific naval installation or within the Department of the Navy is crucial for context. Without access to specific historical data for this installation, we can look at broader trends. The Department of Defense consistently allocates significant funds towards base operations and maintenance, often in the billions annually. Contracts for facilities support services are recurring due to the continuous need for upkeep. Factors influencing historical spending include the age and condition of facilities, changes in operational tempo, and shifts in government-wide procurement strategies. A year-over-year comparison of contract values for similar services can reveal trends in cost escalation or efficiency gains. For instance, if previous contracts for similar services at this location were significantly lower or higher, it would warrant further investigation into the scope, duration, and market conditions at the time of those awards.

How does the per-square-foot cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities?

To compare the per-square-foot cost, we would need the total square footage of the facilities covered by this contract and a detailed breakdown of the services included. Assuming this contract covers a substantial area typical of naval installations, the benchmark would involve researching average facilities management costs per square foot for government and commercial properties. Industry reports from organizations like BOMA International or IFMA provide such benchmarks, often segmented by building type (e.g., administrative, industrial, specialized). If this contract's implied per-square-foot cost is significantly higher than the benchmark, it could indicate a need for closer examination of the scope of services, the complexity of the facilities, or potential inefficiencies. Conversely, a lower cost might suggest strong competition or efficient service delivery. Without the specific square footage and detailed service breakdown, a precise comparison is not feasible, but the $5.36 million value for a year's operation of potentially millions of square feet of naval infrastructure suggests a need for detailed analysis against relevant benchmarks.

What is Akima Facilities Operations LLC's track record with similar government contracts, particularly in facilities support?

Akima Facilities Operations LLC has a notable track record in providing services to the U.S. government, including extensive experience in facilities operations and maintenance. As a subsidiary of Akima LLC, it benefits from the parent company's broad capabilities and established presence in government contracting. Publicly available contract databases often show Akima holding numerous awards across various agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of the Interior, and others, for services that encompass base operations, facilities management, logistics, and technical support. Their performance history on these contracts, including any past performance evaluations or reported issues, would be a key indicator of their capability to successfully execute this $5.36 million contract. A review of their past performance ratings and any significant contract disputes or terminations would provide a comprehensive understanding of their reliability and expertise in delivering facilities support services.

What are the specific performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The specific performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are typically detailed within the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These metrics are designed to ensure that Akima Facilities Operations LLC meets the government's requirements for facilities support services. Common KPIs in such contracts include response times for service requests (e.g., maintenance, repairs), preventative maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, safety incident rates, and customer satisfaction scores. The government will monitor these KPIs throughout the contract period, often through regular reporting by the contractor and government inspections. Failure to meet established KPIs can lead to contract deficiencies, performance improvement plans, or even financial penalties, depending on the contract's terms and conditions. The effectiveness of the contract is directly tied to how well these metrics are defined, measured, and enforced.

Are there any known risks associated with Akima Facilities Operations LLC or the nature of facilities support services in this region?

Potential risks associated with Akima Facilities Operations LLC would generally be assessed through their past performance record, financial stability, and any history of contract compliance issues. For facilities support services in general, risks can include unforeseen infrastructure failures (e.g., aging utility systems), environmental hazards, labor availability and cost fluctuations, and security requirements specific to military installations. Given the contract is in Virginia, a region with significant federal and military presence, there might be heightened security protocols and stringent compliance requirements. Additionally, the fixed-price nature of the contract means that unexpected cost increases for labor or materials could impact the contractor's profitability if not managed effectively. The government's risk is primarily related to service disruptions or substandard performance, which are mitigated through robust oversight and performance management.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2553 DULLES VIEW AVE STE 700, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,361,719

Exercised Options: $5,361,719

Current Obligation: $5,361,719

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247019D2008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline