DoD awards $10.5M facilities support contract to Akima Facilities Operations LLC for 364 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,483,279 ($10.5M)

Contractor: Akima Facilities Operations LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-02-01

End Date: 2026-01-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FUNDING TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.5 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC for work described as: FUNDING TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year facilities support services agreement. 2. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources suggests a potentially limited but justified bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Performance period of 364 days aligns with typical service contract durations. 5. Contract falls within the Facilities Support Services NAICS code, a common area for government contracting. 6. The award is a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle, indicating a phased approach to funding.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $10.5 million for a 364-day period suggests a per-day cost of roughly $28,800. This figure needs to be benchmarked against similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies to determine its value for money. Given the fixed-price nature, the government has a defined cost, but the scope of services will be critical in assessing true value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This specific procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to pre-qualification requirements or specific technical capabilities. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'exclusion of sources' suggests a potentially narrower field than a truly unrestricted full and open competition, which could impact price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: While the competition was not fully unrestricted, the 'after exclusion of sources' designation suggests an effort to ensure a competitive environment among qualified vendors. Taxpayers benefit from a structured bidding process that aims to secure competitive pricing within the defined parameters of the contract.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from the continuity of essential facilities support services. Services provided likely include maintenance, repair, and operational support for government facilities. The geographic impact is concentrated in Virginia, where the contract is registered. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and operations sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' could lead to higher prices than a broader competition.
Scope creep risk if the definition of 'facilities support services' is not clearly delineated.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility operations could pose continuity risks if not managed effectively.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Award to Akima Facilities Operations LLC, a known entity in government contracting, suggests a degree of proven capability.
The contract is a delivery order under a larger vehicle, implying a structured procurement process.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a mix of large and small businesses competing for government contracts. The market size for facilities management services is substantial, with government contracts forming a significant portion. This specific contract fits within the operational support segment of the industry, providing essential services to maintain government infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Akima Facilities Operations LLC is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting requirements for small businesses within this specific delivery order. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Akima utilizes small business subcontractors, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. As a fixed-price contract, oversight would focus on ensuring performance standards are met and that services are delivered as specified. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Base Operations Support Contracts
Government Property Management Services
Department of Defense Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition potential
Scope definition clarity
Contractor performance monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.5 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC. FUNDING TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-02-01. End: 2026-01-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for Akima Facilities Operations LLC with the Department of Defense?

To assess Akima Facilities Operations LLC's track record, a review of their historical contract awards with the Department of Defense (DoD) is necessary. This would involve analyzing past contract values, durations, and performance ratings. A significant volume of previous awards, particularly for similar facilities support services, would indicate experience and a potentially reliable performance history. Conversely, a pattern of cost overruns, performance issues, or contract disputes would raise concerns. Without specific historical data for Akima's DoD contracts, it's difficult to provide a definitive assessment, but their presence as an awardee suggests they are an established contractor within the federal space.

How does the per-day cost of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts?

The daily cost for this contract is approximately $28,800 ($10.5M / 364 days). To benchmark this value, we would compare it against facilities support contracts of similar scope, duration, and geographic location awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies. Factors such as the specific services included (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping, security), the complexity of the facilities, and prevailing market rates in Virginia would influence this comparison. If similar contracts are consistently awarded at lower daily rates, it could indicate that this contract's pricing is not optimal. Conversely, if the services are highly specialized or the facilities are particularly complex, a higher daily rate might be justified.

What are the primary risks associated with this fixed-price contract type?

While fixed-price contracts are generally favored for cost control, they carry specific risks. The primary risk for the government is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or service delivery to maintain profitability if their cost estimates were too low or if unforeseen issues arise. For the contractor, the risk is that actual costs exceed the fixed price, leading to reduced profit margins or even a loss. In this case, the 'Facilities Support Services' scope needs to be meticulously defined to prevent disputes over what is included. Effective performance monitoring by the government is crucial to mitigate the risk of substandard service delivery.

What does 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' imply for program effectiveness?

The procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain potential bidders were deemed ineligible or were not solicited. This could be due to specific technical requirements, past performance evaluations, or other pre-qualification criteria. If the excluded sources were capable and potentially more competitive, this method might limit the pool of innovative solutions or the most cost-effective offers, potentially impacting overall program effectiveness. However, if the exclusions were justified by stringent requirements that only a few contractors could meet, it could lead to a more specialized and effective service provider being selected, albeit potentially at a higher cost.

What is the typical duration and value range for DoD facilities support contracts?

DoD facilities support contracts can vary significantly in duration and value, often depending on the size and complexity of the facilities being supported, as well as the specific services required. Contracts can range from short-term, task-order-based agreements for specific maintenance needs to multi-year, comprehensive base operations support contracts valued in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. A 364-day contract for facilities support, like this one valued at $10.5 million, represents a mid-range award for a defined period, likely covering essential operational and maintenance services for a specific installation or set of buildings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6247017R4003

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2553 DULLES VIEW AVE STE 700, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,483,279

Exercised Options: $10,483,279

Current Obligation: $10,483,279

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247019D2008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline