DoD awards $243M Letter Contract to General Dynamics for Navigation Systems

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $243,195,666 ($243.2M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-17

End Date: 2019-12-17

Contract Duration: 3,378 days

Daily Burn Rate: $72.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: LETTER CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: SCOTTSDALE, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85257

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $243.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: LETTER CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $243M awarded to a single large business. 2. Competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests limited initial competition. 3. Contract duration of 3378 days indicates a long-term commitment. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically Navigation System Manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is a Letter Contract, which is an initial agreement often used to start work quickly before a definitive contract is finalized. Pricing assessment is difficult without knowing the terms of the definitive contract that followed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded. This method can impact price discovery by potentially limiting the pool of bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: The $243M award represents a substantial taxpayer investment. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing the best value for taxpayers is a key consideration.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding advanced navigation systems for defense applications. The long contract duration suggests a sustained need for these systems. Potential for cost overruns or inefficiencies due to the initial letter contract structure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically the manufacturing of navigation systems. Spending in this area is critical for military operations, and benchmarks often focus on technological advancement and reliability alongside cost.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc., a large business. There is no indication of small business participation in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), indicating oversight. However, the initial letter contract phase may have had less stringent oversight compared to a fully negotiated definitive contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $243.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.. LETTER CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $243.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-17. End: 2019-12-17.

What was the final negotiated price and terms of the definitive contract that succeeded this letter contract?

The letter contract served as an initial agreement. The definitive contract, which would contain the final pricing and terms, is crucial for a complete value assessment. Without its details, it's difficult to ascertain the true cost-effectiveness and taxpayer value achieved beyond the initial award amount.

What specific sources were excluded, and what was the justification for their exclusion?

The justification for excluding specific sources under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is critical for understanding the competitive landscape. If exclusions were not well-founded, it could indicate a missed opportunity for better pricing and innovation, potentially increasing risk for the government.

How did the performance and cost of the systems delivered under this contract compare to industry benchmarks?

Evaluating the performance and cost against industry benchmarks is essential for assessing effectiveness. If the systems met or exceeded performance expectations at a competitive cost, it signifies good value. Conversely, deviations could highlight inefficiencies or areas where taxpayer funds were not optimally utilized.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNavigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments ManufacturingSearch, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N0003909R0062

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Wico Limited

Address: 8201 E MCDOWELL ROAD, SCOTTSDALE, AZ, 85257

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $313,235,051

Exercised Options: $248,422,690

Current Obligation: $243,195,666

Actual Outlays: $1,635

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-09-17

Current End Date: 2019-12-17

Potential End Date: 2023-04-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-03-10

More Contracts from General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending