DoD Awards $190M for SH-60 Seahawk Aircraft Development to Concurrent Technologies Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,213,437 ($18.2M)
Contractor: Concurrent Technologies Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2001-01-29
End Date: 2005-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,552 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200112!000364!1700!AC524 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001901C0045 !A!N!*!N! !20010129!20011031!189737810!189737810!189737810!N!CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP !100 CTC DRIVE !JOHNSTOWN !PA!15904!38288!021!42!JOHNSTOWN !CAMBRIA !PENN !+000001482000!N!N!000000000000!AC15!RDTE/AIRCRAFT-ENG/MANUF DEVELOP !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !2AHV!SH-60 SEAHAWK !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !N!U!1!001!N!1A!A!Y!Z! ! !N!Z!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001!
Place of Performance
Location: JOHNSTOWN, CAMBRIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15904
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.2 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: 200112!000364!1700!AC524 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001901C0045 !A!N!*!N! !20010129!20011031!189737810!189737810!189737810!N!CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP !100 CTC DRIVE !JOHNSTOWN !PA!15904!38288!021!42!JOHNSTOWN !CAMBR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for SH-60 Seahawk aircraft development. 2. Concurrent Technologies Corp. is the sole contractor. 3. Significant taxpayer investment in aircraft R&D. 4. Focus on aircraft engineering and manufacturing development.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value is $189,737,810. Without specific benchmarks for similar SH-60 Seahawk development contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the scale suggests a substantial investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as competitive pressures are absent.
Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award means taxpayers may not have received the benefit of competitive bidding, potentially resulting in a higher overall cost for the development.
Public Impact
Enhances capabilities of the SH-60 Seahawk helicopter, a critical asset for naval operations. Supports advanced research and development in aircraft engineering. Potential for job creation and economic impact in Pennsylvania.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to inflated costs.
- Sole-source award raises questions about best value.
- Long contract duration (1552 days) could indicate complexity or potential for cost overruns.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical defense needs for naval aviation.
- Invests in advanced technology for a key military platform.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector, specifically for aircraft engineering and manufacturing development. Defense R&D spending is a significant portion of the federal budget, with aircraft development being a major component.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The award went to a single, larger entity.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was managed by the Naval Air Systems Command, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract performance monitoring and financial reviews to ensure adherence to terms and budget.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term R&D.
- Limited transparency on specific development goals.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, pa, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.2 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 200112!000364!1700!AC524 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001901C0045 !A!N!*!N! !20010129!20011031!189737810!189737810!189737810!N!CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP !100 CTC DRIVE !JOHNSTOWN !PA!15904!38288!021!42!JOHNSTOWN !CAMBRIA !PENN !+000001482000!N!N!000000000000!AC15!RDTE/AIRCRAFT-ENG/MANUF DEVELOP !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !2AHV!SH-60 SEAHAWK !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-01-29. End: 2005-04-30.
What specific technological advancements or capabilities are being developed for the SH-60 Seahawk under this contract?
The data indicates the contract is for 'RDTE/AIRCRAFT-ENG/MANUF DEVELOP' related to the 'SH-60 SEAHAWK'. While specific advancements aren't detailed, this typically involves upgrades to avionics, propulsion, structural integrity, or mission systems to enhance performance, survivability, or operational effectiveness in various naval roles.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of through full and open competition?
Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, or when there's a compelling urgency. For specialized R&D like advanced aircraft development, the contractor might possess unique expertise, proprietary technology, or prior development experience essential for the project, making competition impractical or detrimental to program goals.
How will the effectiveness of the R&D investment be measured to ensure value for taxpayer money?
Effectiveness is usually measured against predefined technical milestones and performance metrics outlined in the contract. The Naval Air Systems Command would monitor progress, conduct testing, and evaluate whether the developed technologies meet the specified requirements for the SH-60 Seahawk. Successful integration and performance validation of the upgrades would signify effective R&D investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 100 CTC DRIVE, JOHNSTOWN, PA, 15904
Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-01-29
Current End Date: 2005-04-30
Potential End Date: 2005-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-05-10
More Contracts from Concurrent Technologies Corp
- Rdt&e Systems Operations and Maintenance — $193.7M (Department of Defense)
- 199808!2100!0494!AE30 !U.S. Army Armament RD&E Center !daae3098c1050 !A!*!* !19980430!20030430!189737810!189737810!189737810!n!0w151!concurrent Technologies Corpor!100 CTC DR !johnstown !pa!15904!38288!021!42!johnstown !cambria !penn !0001!+000002313250!n!n!000000000000!ah96!rdte/Other Environmental Protection-Mgmt Support !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !7389!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !u!u!1!001!n!1g!z!y!z!* !* !n!z!*!*!*!a!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!c!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $154.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $94.0M (Department of Defense)
- Basic Effort - Exercised Portion — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- Operations and Sustainment, Technical Management, and Analytical Support to Mishap, Risk, Health and Resilience, and Drug Demand Reduction Education and Training, Implementation, Data Collection and Analysis, Reporting, Maintenance, and, Assessment for the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, USD (P&R), Personnel Risk Reduction — $49.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)