DoD's $49M Personnel Readiness Support Contract Awarded to Concurrent Technologies Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $49,064,577 ($49.1M)
Contractor: Concurrent Technologies Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2015-09-30
End Date: 2024-08-30
Contract Duration: 3,257 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT, TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT, AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT TO MISHAP, RISK, HEALTH AND RESILIENCE, AND DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION EDUCATION AND TRAINING, IMPLEMENTATION, DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS, REPORTING, MAINTENANCE, AND, ASSESSMENT FOR THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PERSONNEL AND READINESS, USD (P&R), PERSONNEL RISK REDUCTION.
Place of Performance
Location: JOHNSTOWN, CAMBRIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15904
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $49.1 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT, TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT, AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT TO MISHAP, RISK, HEALTH AND RESILIENCE, AND DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION EDUCATION AND TRAINING, IMPLEMENTATION, DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS, REPORTING, MAINTENANCE, AND, ASSESSMENT FOR THE UNDER SECR… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on risk reduction, health, and resilience programs for the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. 2. Concurrent Technologies Corp. has held this contract since 2015, indicating a long-standing relationship. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. While the contract is for Engineering Services, its broad scope covers education, training, and data analysis.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure for this $49M contract raises concerns about potential cost escalation. Benchmarking against similar broad support services contracts is difficult due to the specialized nature of the work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the long duration and multiple delivery orders may indicate a sole-source extension or modification over time.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential personnel readiness and risk reduction programs, aiming for long-term benefits in military well-being and operational effectiveness.
Public Impact
Enhances critical support for military personnel well-being and safety. Supports data-driven decision-making in risk management and health initiatives. Ensures continuity of essential training and educational programs. Contributes to a more resilient and effective military force.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure
- Long contract duration
- Potential for scope creep
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition
- Focus on critical personnel readiness
- Experienced contractor
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Engineering Services, a broad category. The specific application to personnel readiness, risk reduction, and health programs is unique and essential for military operations. Spending benchmarks for such specialized support services are not readily available.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). There is no information provided on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which provides oversight for contract performance and compliance. The multiple delivery orders suggest ongoing monitoring and adjustments.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to cost overruns.
- Long contract duration (2015-2024) may indicate a lack of ongoing competition or potential for complacency.
- No indication of small business subcontracting participation.
- Broad scope of services could lead to challenges in performance measurement and oversight.
- Specific performance metrics and outcomes are not detailed in the provided data.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, pa, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $49.1 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. IGF::OT::IGF OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT, TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT, AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT TO MISHAP, RISK, HEALTH AND RESILIENCE, AND DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION EDUCATION AND TRAINING, IMPLEMENTATION, DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS, REPORTING, MAINTENANCE, AND, ASSESSMENT FOR THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PERSONNEL AND READINESS, USD (P&R), PERSONNEL RISK REDUCTION.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $49.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-09-30. End: 2024-08-30.
What is the specific breakdown of costs within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, and how is the fixed fee determined to ensure value?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure involves reimbursement of allowable costs plus a negotiated fixed fee. To ensure value, the fixed fee is typically based on factors like complexity, risk, and contractor profit. Detailed cost breakdowns and the rationale for the fixed fee are usually found in contract modifications and audit reports, requiring deeper investigation into specific delivery orders and the contractor's cost accounting practices.
Given the contract's long duration and multiple delivery orders, what mechanisms are in place to prevent scope creep and ensure continued fair pricing?
Mechanisms to prevent scope creep and ensure fair pricing include rigorous change control processes, independent government cost estimates for modifications, and regular performance reviews. The contracting officer must ensure that any changes are properly justified, documented, and priced competitively. Periodic market research and benchmarking against similar services can also help validate pricing over the contract's life.
How effectively has Concurrent Technologies Corp. met the objectives related to mishap prevention, risk reduction, and health resilience over the contract's lifespan?
Assessing the effectiveness requires reviewing performance metrics, contractor reports, and potentially feedback from the end-users within USD (P&R). Key performance indicators (KPIs) related to reduced incidents, improved health outcomes, and successful training program implementation would be crucial. Without access to these specific performance evaluations, a definitive judgment on effectiveness cannot be made.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002415R3410
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 100 CTC DR, JOHNSTOWN, PA, 15904
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $49,192,680
Exercised Options: $49,192,680
Current Obligation: $49,064,577
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 27
Total Subaward Amount: $52,086,070
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017814D7674
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-09-30
Current End Date: 2024-08-30
Potential End Date: 2024-08-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-10-02
More Contracts from Concurrent Technologies Corp
- Rdt&e Systems Operations and Maintenance — $193.7M (Department of Defense)
- 199808!2100!0494!AE30 !U.S. Army Armament RD&E Center !daae3098c1050 !A!*!* !19980430!20030430!189737810!189737810!189737810!n!0w151!concurrent Technologies Corpor!100 CTC DR !johnstown !pa!15904!38288!021!42!johnstown !cambria !penn !0001!+000002313250!n!n!000000000000!ah96!rdte/Other Environmental Protection-Mgmt Support !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !7389!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !u!u!1!001!n!1g!z!y!z!* !* !n!z!*!*!*!a!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!c!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $154.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $94.0M (Department of Defense)
- Basic Effort - Exercised Portion — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- Purpose of the Order IS to Provide Safety and Occupational Health, Management, Analytic and Technical Support Services for the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Readiness, Office of Force Safety and Occupational Health to Reduce Risks — $45.5M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)