DoD's $154M TAS Phase 3 Contract Awarded to Concurrent Technologies Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,447,867 ($15.4M)

Contractor: Concurrent Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-05-04

End Date: 2010-07-06

Contract Duration: 1,159 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TAS::17 1804::TAS PHASE 3

Place of Performance

Location: JOHNSTOWN, CAMBRIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15904

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.4 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: TAS::17 1804::TAS PHASE 3 Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $154.48 million. 2. No competition was identified for this award. 3. Potential risk associated with sole-source procurement. 4. Services fall under 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services'.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the fixed fee represents fair value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible price for these consulting services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have paid more due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of the Navy received specialized consulting services. The contract duration was over three years, indicating a substantial project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award
Cost-plus contract type
Lack of transparency in pricing

Positive Signals

Specific technical services provided
Long-term engagement suggests critical need

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services,' a broad category. Benchmarks for this specific type of service are hard to establish without more detail on the TAS Phase 3 project.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as 'sb' is false.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'PA' status code suggests a 'Procurement Action' which may have undergone some level of review, but the sole-source nature warrants scrutiny for proper justification.

Related Government Programs

Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for cost overruns (CPFF)
Limited transparency on pricing justification
Difficulty in benchmarking specialized services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.4 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. TAS::17 1804::TAS PHASE 3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-04. End: 2010-07-06.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding why competition was bypassed. Without this information, it's impossible to determine if the government's interests were fully served or if alternative solutions were adequately explored. This lack of transparency can obscure potential inefficiencies or missed opportunities for cost savings.

How was the fixed fee determined in this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract to ensure fairness?

In a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, the fixed fee is negotiated upfront. Its fairness is typically assessed by comparing it to similar contracts, industry standards, and the contractor's historical performance. Without competitive data, the government must rely heavily on its own cost estimation capabilities and negotiation expertise to ensure the fee is reasonable and reflects the effort required.

What tangible outcomes or effectiveness metrics were achieved by TAS Phase 3 services?

Assessing the effectiveness of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' requires clear performance metrics and deliverables tied to the TAS Phase 3 project. Without knowing the specific objectives and how success was measured, it's difficult to evaluate the value delivered to the Department of the Navy and the overall return on the $154 million investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Community and Regional Development R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: M6785407R8019

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 CTC DR, JOHNSTOWN, PA, 15904

Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,999,998

Exercised Options: $29,999,998

Current Obligation: $15,447,867

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline