Coast Guard Renovates Chase Hall Barracks for $19M, Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,006,963 ($19.0M)

Contractor: Ttec-Tesoro Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2011-11-02

End Date: 2013-10-18

Contract Duration: 716 days

Daily Burn Rate: $26.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CHASE HALL BARRACKS RENOVATIONS, U. S. COAST GUARD ACADEMY, NEW LONDON, CT

Place of Performance

Location: NEW LONDON, NEW LONDON County, CONNECTICUT, 06320

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $19.0 million to TTEC-TESORO JOINT VENTURE for work described as: CHASE HALL BARRACKS RENOVATIONS, U. S. COAST GUARD ACADEMY, NEW LONDON, CT Key points: 1. Spending of $19M on barracks renovation is significant for a single project. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting potential for good pricing. 3. Risk appears moderate, given the fixed-price contract and construction nature. 4. Sector is commercial building construction, a common area for federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $19M cost for renovating barracks is within a reasonable range for a project of this scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale institutional building renovations would provide further context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. The delivery order structure suggests it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better value for taxpayers by ensuring the government receives the most advantageous offers.

Public Impact

Renovations will improve living conditions for U.S. Coast Guard Academy cadets. Project completion impacts training capacity and readiness at the academy. Investment in infrastructure supports the long-term operational capabilities of the Coast Guard.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This project falls under commercial and institutional building construction. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, covering a wide range of infrastructure needs from barracks to research facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This is a missed opportunity to support small businesses, especially in the construction sector where they often play a significant role.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Homeland Security, specifically the U.S. Coast Guard, is responsible for overseeing this renovation. Standard procurement and construction oversight processes should be in place.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-homeland-security, ct, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $19.0 million to TTEC-TESORO JOINT VENTURE. CHASE HALL BARRACKS RENOVATIONS, U. S. COAST GUARD ACADEMY, NEW LONDON, CT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TTEC-TESORO JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-11-02. End: 2013-10-18.

What was the original estimated cost, and how did the final award price compare?

The provided data shows the award amount at $19,006,963. Without the original estimate, it's difficult to assess if the final price was significantly higher or lower. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests the price was deemed competitive at the time of award.

Were there any significant delays or cost overruns during the project's execution?

The project duration was 716 days, which is approximately two years. While the contract was firm fixed price, the duration itself might indicate potential challenges or scope adjustments. Further investigation into project milestones and any change orders would clarify if there were significant delays or cost impacts beyond the initial award.

How does the per-square-foot cost of this renovation compare to similar projects?

The data does not include square footage, making a direct per-square-foot cost comparison impossible. To assess value, one would need to obtain project blueprints or architectural details to calculate the area and then benchmark against similar government or private sector barracks renovations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 302 RESEARCH DR #200, NORCROSS, GA, 30092

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,006,963

Exercised Options: $19,006,963

Current Obligation: $19,006,963

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HSCG4709D3EFK22

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-11-02

Current End Date: 2013-10-18

Potential End Date: 2016-12-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-12-13

More Contracts from Ttec-Tesoro Joint Venture

View all Ttec-Tesoro Joint Venture federal contracts →

Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts

View all Department of Homeland Security contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending