Army awards $22.9M for drill sergeant school construction, completed in 2011

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,896,883 ($22.9M)

Contractor: Ttec-Tesoro Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-03-06

End Date: 2011-11-01

Contract Duration: 1,335 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSOLIDATED DRILL SERGEANT SCHOOL, FORT JACKSON, SC

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBIA, RICHLAND County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29207

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.9 million to TTEC-TESORO JOINT VENTURE for work described as: CONSOLIDATED DRILL SERGEANT SCHOOL, FORT JACKSON, SC Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year construction project of this nature. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. Project duration of 1335 days indicates a significant construction undertaking. 4. Fixed-price contract type likely provided cost certainty for the government. 5. Location in South Carolina places the project within a specific regional construction market.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $22.9 million for the Consolidated Drill Sergeant School at Fort Jackson, SC, appears to be within a reasonable range for a large-scale construction project. Without specific benchmarks for similar military training facility constructions, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government aimed for cost predictability. The project was completed within its awarded timeframe, indicating effective project management and execution.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 4 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and potentially leads to more cost-effective outcomes for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army and its incoming drill sergeants, who will utilize the new training facilities. The project delivered a consolidated drill sergeant school, enhancing training infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to Fort Jackson, South Carolina. The construction project likely supported local and regional jobs in the construction sector during its execution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Project completed within the awarded duration.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. The U.S. military is a significant client for construction services, often awarding large, complex projects. Benchmarking this contract would involve comparing its cost and scope to other military construction projects, such as barracks, training facilities, or administrative buildings, considering factors like square footage, complexity, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engaged small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

As a Department of the Army contract, oversight would typically involve contracting officers, program managers, and potentially the Army Audit Agency or the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, especially if any issues arose during the contract's performance or closeout. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Training Facilities
Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Fort Jackson Operations

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.9 million to TTEC-TESORO JOINT VENTURE. CONSOLIDATED DRILL SERGEANT SCHOOL, FORT JACKSON, SC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TTEC-TESORO JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-03-06. End: 2011-11-01.

What was the specific scope of work for the Consolidated Drill Sergeant School construction?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work. However, as a 'Consolidated Drill Sergeant School,' the project likely involved the construction or significant renovation of facilities designed to house and train drill sergeants. This could include classrooms, barracks, administrative offices, physical training areas, and support facilities necessary for a comprehensive training program. The 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' classification further supports this interpretation, indicating the creation of a functional building complex rather than specialized infrastructure like roads or utilities.

How does the $22.9 million cost compare to similar military construction projects?

Direct cost comparison is challenging without detailed project specifications (e.g., square footage, specific amenities, complexity of systems). However, $22.9 million for a multi-year construction project at a major military installation like Fort Jackson is not unusual. For context, similar projects like barracks construction or renovation of training facilities can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars depending on scale and features. The fixed-price nature suggests the cost was determined upfront, and the project's completion within the awarded duration implies adherence to the budget as planned.

What were the key performance indicators or success criteria for this construction contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list key performance indicators (KPIs). However, for a construction contract of this nature, typical success criteria would include adherence to the construction schedule (duration of 1335 days), completion within the fixed price of $22.9 million, meeting all specified quality standards and building codes, and delivering a facility that meets the functional requirements of the U.S. Army for drill sergeant training. Post-occupancy evaluations and defect liability periods would also be part of assessing successful performance.

Were there any notable risks identified or managed during the execution of this contract?

The available data does not specify identified risks. However, common risks in large-scale construction projects include weather delays, material cost fluctuations (though mitigated by fixed-price), labor shortages, unforeseen site conditions, and design changes. The contract's fixed-price nature and completion within the awarded duration suggest that the contractor effectively managed these potential risks, or that the initial risk assessment and contingency planning were adequate.

What is the historical spending trend for drill sergeant training facilities or similar construction at Fort Jackson?

The provided data only includes this single contract award. To assess historical spending trends, one would need to analyze contract data for Fort Jackson and the Department of the Army over several years, specifically looking for construction projects related to training facilities, barracks, or educational institutions. This would involve querying databases like FPDS for similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and contract types to identify patterns in spending, project sizes, and contractor involvement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912HN07R0062

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 302 RESEARCH DR #200, NORCROSS, GA, 30092

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,896,883

Exercised Options: $22,896,883

Current Obligation: $22,896,883

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912HN07D0058

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline