FEMA Security Guards Contract Awarded to Knight Protective Service for $12.1M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,105,860 ($12.1M)
Contractor: Knight Protective Service, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2007-08-31
End Date: 2009-10-31
Contract Duration: 792 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.3K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: FEMA SECURITY GUARDS
Place of Performance
Location: CAPITOL HEIGHTS, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20743
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $12.1 million to KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC. for work described as: FEMA SECURITY GUARDS Key points: 1. Contract value of $12.1 million for security guard services. 2. Awarded to Knight Protective Service, Inc. by the Department of Homeland Security. 3. The contract was a competitive delivery order, suggesting some price discovery. 4. Services provided in Maryland, a key operational area for FEMA.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $12.1 million for security guards over two years appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for security services would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
This was a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely competed for the award. This method generally promotes better pricing than sole-source contracts.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received a fair price for the security services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensures security for FEMA operations, critical during disaster response. Supports national security by protecting federal assets. Provides employment opportunities within the security services sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is relatively long (792 days).
- No specific mention of small business participation.
- PSC code is missing, hindering detailed analysis.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Clear agency and service provided.
- Defined start and end dates.
Sector Analysis
Security guard services are a common federal expenditure, often procured through competitive means. Benchmarks vary widely based on location, service level, and contract duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb=false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to compete or subcontract.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Homeland Security, through its Office of Procurement Operations, managed this award. Standard procurement regulations were likely followed, but specific oversight details are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Security Guards and Patrol Services
- Department of Homeland Security Contracting
- Office of Procurement Operations Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance data.
- Missing Product/Service Code (PSC).
- No explicit small business subcontracting information.
- Long contract duration without clear justification.
Tags
security-guards-and-patrol-services, department-of-homeland-security, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $12.1 million to KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC.. FEMA SECURITY GUARDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-08-31. End: 2009-10-31.
What was the specific scope of services and performance metrics required under this contract?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of services or performance metrics. Understanding these would be crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. Key elements would include guard-to-area ratios, required certifications, and response protocols, which are essential for evaluating the effectiveness and appropriateness of the $12.1 million expenditure.
Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during its two-year term?
Information regarding performance issues or contract modifications is not available in the provided dataset. Such details are vital for assessing the contractor's reliability and the overall success of the contract. Post-award performance reviews and modification logs would offer insights into potential risks or efficiencies realized.
How did the pricing compare to other competitive bids received for this delivery order?
While the award was competitive, the specific pricing comparison between bids is not detailed. Knowing the range of bids and the winning margin would illuminate the effectiveness of the price discovery process. This information is typically found in detailed procurement records and helps ascertain if the government secured the best possible price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6411 IVY LN STE 320, GREENBELT, MD, 20770
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,764,581
Exercised Options: $17,333,978
Current Obligation: $12,105,860
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F0266K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-08-31
Current End Date: 2009-10-31
Potential End Date: 2009-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-05-08
More Contracts from Knight Protective Service, Inc.
- Security Services — $52.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Security Guard Services — $20.7M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Security Guard Service — $18.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Armed Guard Services Southern Louisiana, Fema Posts Contract NO. Gs-07f-0266k. Task Order NO. Hscefc-07-F-00019. PDN NO. PJ7R7-00040 — $18.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- 200112!000312!9700!ZD46 !WHS RE&F Directorate !gs07f0266k !c!n!*!n!mda94601f0101 !20010614!20010930!627592843!627592843!627592843!n!knight Protective Service, INC!8507 Edgeworth Drive !capitol Height !md!20743!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000000801940!n!n!000000000000!s206!guard Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561612!*!*!6! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*! ! !A ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $15.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Knight Protective Service, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)