NASA's $52.2M Security Services Contract Awarded to Knight Protective Service, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $52,204,879 ($52.2M)
Contractor: Knight Protective Service, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2002-12-15
End Date: 2012-07-31
Contract Duration: 3,516 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.8K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SECURITY SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: CAPITOL HEIGHTS, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20743
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $52.2 million to KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC. for work described as: SECURITY SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant 10-year contract value highlights long-term reliance on security services. 2. Competition method (Competitive Delivery Order) suggests potential for price discovery. 3. Risk of service disruption exists due to long contract duration and potential vendor changes. 4. Security services sector is critical for government operations, impacting physical safety and asset protection.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract was awarded via a competitive delivery order, indicating some level of price comparison. However, without specific benchmark data for similar security guard services, a precise value assessment is difficult. The long duration may also obscure current market pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract was awarded using a competitive delivery order process, which allows for competition among pre-qualified vendors. This method generally promotes better pricing than sole-source awards, but the specific price discovery effectiveness depends on the number of bids and negotiation leverage.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for essential security services. The competitive nature of the award aims to ensure efficient use of these funds, though ongoing monitoring is needed to confirm value.
Public Impact
Ensures safety and security for NASA facilities and personnel. Supports critical government functions by maintaining secure operational environments. Provides employment opportunities within the security services industry. Contributes to the overall national security infrastructure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (10 years) may lead to price escalation or outdated service levels.
- Reliance on a single vendor for extended periods can create dependency.
- Potential for service quality degradation over time if not actively managed.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data makes quality assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process suggests an effort to secure reasonable pricing.
- Contract covers essential security functions, indicating a clear need.
- Long-term award provides stability for both the agency and the contractor.
Sector Analysis
The security services sector is vital for government agencies, encompassing a wide range of protective measures. Spending in this sector is benchmarked against the need for physical security, personnel safety, and asset protection, with significant variation based on agency size and operational complexity.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to Knight Protective Service, Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine if this firm qualifies as a small business and to assess the impact on small business participation in NASA's security contracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's long duration necessitates robust oversight from NASA to ensure service quality, adherence to contract terms, and fair pricing throughout its life cycle. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Security Guards and Patrol Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration.
- Potential for service quality degradation.
- Lack of specific performance metrics.
- Uncertainty regarding current market pricing alignment.
Tags
security-guards-and-patrol-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $52.2 million to KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC.. SECURITY SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $52.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-12-15. End: 2012-07-31.
What is the average annual cost per guard under this contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks?
The total contract value is $52.2 million over approximately 3516 days (10 years). This averages to roughly $5.22 million per year. Without knowing the number of guards or hours worked, a precise per-unit cost is impossible. However, if we assume an average of 100 guards working 24/7, the annual cost per guard would be approximately $52,200. This figure needs to be compared against specific regional and service-level benchmarks for security personnel to determine value.
What are the specific risks associated with a 10-year contract for security services, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
A 10-year contract for security services carries risks such as potential price increases due to inflation or market shifts, service quality degradation if performance is not actively managed, and technological obsolescence of security measures. Mitigation strategies could include price adjustment clauses tied to economic indicators, stringent performance metrics with penalties for non-compliance, and periodic reviews to incorporate updated security technologies and protocols.
How effectively did the competitive delivery order process ensure optimal value for taxpayer money compared to other procurement methods?
The competitive delivery order process likely provided better value than a sole-source award by introducing competition among qualified vendors. This typically drives down prices and encourages better service offerings. However, the true effectiveness in securing optimal value depends on the number of bids received, the thoroughness of the evaluation criteria, and the negotiation leverage NASA possessed. Without comparative data from other procurement methods for similar services, a definitive assessment is challenging.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 8507 EDGEWORTH DR, CAPITOL HEIGHTS, MD, 04
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $199,266,738
Exercised Options: $61,011,683
Current Obligation: $52,204,879
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F0266K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-12-15
Current End Date: 2012-07-31
Potential End Date: 2012-08-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-02-10
More Contracts from Knight Protective Service, Inc.
- Security Guard Services — $20.7M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Security Guard Service — $18.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Armed Guard Services Southern Louisiana, Fema Posts Contract NO. Gs-07f-0266k. Task Order NO. Hscefc-07-F-00019. PDN NO. PJ7R7-00040 — $18.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- 200112!000312!9700!ZD46 !WHS RE&F Directorate !gs07f0266k !c!n!*!n!mda94601f0101 !20010614!20010930!627592843!627592843!627592843!n!knight Protective Service, INC!8507 Edgeworth Drive !capitol Height !md!20743!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000000801940!n!n!000000000000!s206!guard Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561612!*!*!6! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*! ! !A ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $15.3M (Department of Defense)
- Armed Guard Services Southern Louisiana Fema. Contract NO. Gs-07f-0266k. Task Order NO. Hscec7-08-F-00087. PDN No.pj8r700157 — $14.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
View all Knight Protective Service, Inc. federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →