Department of Defense awards $26.2M contract for Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams Support to Engility Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,207,092 ($26.2M)

Contractor: Engility Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-08-30

End Date: 2023-02-28

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF HABEAS CORPUS PRIVILEGE TEAMS SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.2 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF HABEAS CORPUS PRIVILEGE TEAMS SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. The duration of the contract is substantial, spanning over 2000 days. 4. The award was a delivery order, indicating it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to engineering services. 6. The contract was awarded to a single entity, Engility Services, LLC. 7. The contract is managed by Washington Headquarters Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific details on the services provided. The total award amount of $26.2 million over approximately six years suggests an average annual value of around $4.37 million. This figure needs to be compared against the cost of similar support services within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for value if the price is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a robust competitive environment. Full and open competition is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation as contractors vie for the award.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically leads to more favorable pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, ensuring that government funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely Department of Defense legal and administrative personnel requiring specialized support. The services delivered are related to Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams, suggesting legal or administrative support functions. The contract is managed by Washington Headquarters Services, indicating a focus on supporting the Pentagon and its associated entities. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around Washington D.C., where the headquarters services are based.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the services.
The long contract duration could lead to contractor complacency if not managed actively.
Details on the specific nature of 'Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams Support' are limited, raising questions about the scope and necessity.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm Fixed Price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The contract is managed by a central administrative body (Washington Headquarters Services).

Sector Analysis

The engineering services sector (NAICS 541330) is a significant part of the federal contracting landscape, encompassing a wide range of specialized technical and advisory services. This contract likely falls within the professional services category, supporting critical government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar administrative or legal support services within large federal agencies would provide further context for the $26.2 million award.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if Engility Services, LLC chooses to engage them. Without further information on subcontracting plans, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of Washington Headquarters Services, the contracting agency. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which requires the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Administrative Support Contracts
Legal Services Contracts
Professional Services Contracts
Washington Headquarters Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Ambiguous service description
Limited performance data available
Long contract duration without clear performance benchmarks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.2 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF HABEAS CORPUS PRIVILEGE TEAMS SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-08-30. End: 2023-02-28.

What specific services are encompassed by 'Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams Support'?

The term 'Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams Support' is not a standard or widely defined service category within federal contracting. Habeas corpus is a legal writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person's release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention. Privilege teams might refer to groups responsible for managing or asserting legal privileges, such as attorney-client privilege, within the context of habeas corpus proceedings. This could involve research, documentation, administrative assistance, or coordination related to these specific legal processes. Without more granular detail from the contract's statement of work, the precise nature of the support remains ambiguous, making it difficult to assess its necessity or effectiveness.

How does the $26.2 million award compare to similar support contracts within the Department of Defense?

Direct comparison of the $26.2 million award for 'Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams Support' to similar contracts within the Department of Defense (DoD) is challenging due to the unique and potentially specialized nature of the service described. However, the total value spread over approximately six years (from August 2017 to February 2023) indicates an average annual expenditure of roughly $4.37 million. This figure can be benchmarked against other DoD contracts for administrative, legal support, or specialized research services. For instance, contracts for general legal services or administrative support within large federal agencies often range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars annually, depending on scope and complexity. The specific focus on habeas corpus privilege suggests a niche requirement, potentially justifying a distinct contract value if the demand is significant and specialized.

What is the track record of Engility Services, LLC in performing similar government contracts?

Engility Services, LLC, has a history of performing various government contracts, primarily within the defense and intelligence sectors. While this specific contract focuses on 'Habeas Corpus Privilege Teams Support,' Engility's broader portfolio often includes IT services, engineering, logistics, and program management support for federal agencies. Assessing their track record for this particular type of service would require examining past performance evaluations and customer feedback specifically related to legal or administrative support functions, if available. Generally, Engility has been a significant contractor, and their ability to secure contracts of this magnitude suggests a baseline level of capability and past performance that meets federal procurement standards. However, the success of this specific contract hinges on their expertise in the niche area of habeas corpus legal support.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract of this duration?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract shifts the majority of cost risk to the contractor, which is generally favorable for the government. However, risks can still arise. For a contract of this duration (over 2000 days), there's a risk that the initial price may not adequately account for unforeseen changes in labor costs, inflation, or evolving service requirements over time. If the contractor underestimated these factors, they might seek to reduce quality or scope to maintain profitability, or potentially face financial distress. Conversely, if the contractor significantly overestimated costs, the government might be paying a premium. Active contract management and clear performance standards are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives the intended value throughout the contract's life.

How does the 'full and open competition' designation impact taxpayer value for this contract?

The designation of 'full and open competition' is a positive indicator for taxpayer value. It signifies that the government actively sought bids from all eligible and responsible sources, rather than restricting the pool of potential contractors. This broad competition typically drives down prices as contractors are incentivized to offer their most competitive rates and innovative solutions to win the award. It also increases the likelihood that the government selects the best value proposal, considering both price and technical merit. For taxpayers, this means that the $26.2 million awarded is more likely to represent a fair market price for the services rendered, minimizing the risk of overpayment compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: HQ003417R0189

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Science Applications International Corporation

Address: 35 NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS CENTER DR STE 200, ANDOVER, MA, 01810

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,207,092

Exercised Options: $26,207,092

Current Obligation: $26,207,092

Actual Outlays: $1,198,700

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F092CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline