DoD's $21.2M administrative consulting contract awarded to Engility Services, LLC, ran for 5 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,233,117 ($21.2M)
Contractor: Engility Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-08-30
End Date: 2017-09-29
Contract Duration: 1,856 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PRIVILEGE TEAMS
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.2 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: PRIVILEGE TEAMS Key points: 1. The contract's value of $21.2 million over five years suggests a moderate investment in administrative management consulting. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, the contract likely benefited from a competitive bidding process. 3. The firm fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns. 4. The contract was awarded to a single entity, Engility Services, LLC, for administrative management and general management consulting. 5. The duration of 1856 days (approximately 5 years) is typical for a service contract of this nature. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to a focus on management consulting services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this $21.2 million contract requires more granular data on the specific services rendered. However, for a five-year administrative management consulting engagement, the average annual value of approximately $4.2 million appears within a reasonable range for large-scale federal support. Without specific performance metrics or comparisons to similar, contemporaneous contracts for identical services, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure suggests a degree of cost control was intended.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding environment, which typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The fact that it was competed openly is a positive sign for price discovery and ensuring taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and encouraging innovation among bidders.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the Department of Defense (DoD) agencies requiring administrative management and general management consulting services. The services delivered would have supported the operational efficiency and administrative functions within the DoD. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where the contract was administered. The contract supported professional services roles, potentially impacting the federal workforce by augmenting existing capabilities or providing specialized expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true impact and value delivered.
- The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' could lead to scope creep if not tightly managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a significant duration may limit flexibility in adapting to evolving needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded fair pricing.
- The firm fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, which is generally favorable for the government.
- The contract duration of five years provides stability for both the agency and the contractor in delivering services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for administrative consulting services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise. The $21.2 million award is moderate within the context of large federal consulting contracts, but significant for the specific services procured.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) was false, and there was no specific small business set-aside (ss). This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses, and larger firms likely dominated the bidding process. There is no information on subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear but likely minimal unless Engility Services, LLC proactively engaged small businesses as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program managers within the Department of Defense's Washington Headquarters Services. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Administrative Support Contracts
- Federal Management Consulting Services
- Washington Headquarters Services Contracts
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules (if applicable for procurement vehicle)
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep in broad consulting services.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data.
- Limited insight into small business subcontracting impact.
Tags
department-of-defense, administrative-support, management-consulting, washington-headquarters-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-services, district-of-columbia, naics-541611, contract-award, service-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.2 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC. PRIVILEGE TEAMS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-08-30. End: 2017-09-29.
What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services). However, it does not detail the specific services rendered. These could range widely, including areas like organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning support, human capital management consulting, financial management consulting, or operational efficiency improvements within the Department of Defense. Without a detailed statement of work (SOW) or contract modifications, the precise nature of the consulting services remains unspecified in the summary data.
How does the $21.2 million contract value compare to similar administrative consulting contracts awarded by the DoD?
Comparing the $21.2 million value requires context regarding the duration and scope of services. For a five-year contract (1856 days), this averages approximately $4.2 million annually. This figure is moderate for large federal consulting engagements. The DoD procures a vast array of consulting services, with some contracts reaching hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars for broader strategic initiatives or large-scale transformations. However, for specific administrative support functions, $21.2 million over five years represents a substantial, but not exceptionally large, investment. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing it to contracts with similar NAICS codes, duration, and specific service deliverables.
What was the track record of Engility Services, LLC, prior to or during the performance of this contract?
Engility Services, LLC, was a significant government contractor. Information regarding their specific track record prior to or during this contract's performance (2012-2017) would typically be found in federal procurement databases like SAM.gov (or its predecessors) and through contract performance reports (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS). Generally, Engility was known for providing a range of services including IT, engineering, and mission support to various federal agencies. Assessing their specific performance on this particular $21.2 million contract would require reviewing CPARS data, which details contractor performance against technical requirements, cost, schedule, and management.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. For administrative management and general management consulting services, typical KPIs might include metrics related to process efficiency improvements (e.g., reduced cycle times, cost savings achieved), successful implementation of new administrative procedures, client satisfaction scores, timely delivery of reports and recommendations, and adherence to project milestones. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that meeting the defined scope of work and deliverables within budget was a primary measure of success, alongside quality standards.
Were there any significant challenges or disputes encountered during the contract's performance?
The summary data does not indicate any specific challenges or disputes related to this contract. Federal contract performance databases, such as the CPARS system, would typically document significant issues, claims, or disputes. Without access to such detailed performance records, it's impossible to ascertain if there were any major hurdles. Common challenges in consulting contracts can include scope definition issues, unexpected complexities in the client's environment, communication breakdowns, or disagreements over deliverables. The firm fixed-price structure could also lead to disputes if the scope of work was not clearly defined or if unforeseen requirements emerged.
How did the 'full and open competition' impact the final pricing and selection of Engility Services, LLC?
A 'full and open competition' process implies that multiple companies were invited to bid, and the contract was awarded to the offeror providing the best value to the government. This competitive environment typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. The final pricing would be a result of the proposals submitted, evaluated against criteria such as technical approach, past performance, and price. Engility Services, LLC was selected presumably because their proposal offered the best combination of these factors, demonstrating capability and competitive pricing relative to other bidders. The open nature ensures that the government isn't limited to a single source and can leverage market competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: HQ003412R3089
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Science Applications International Corporation (UEI: 078745061)
Address: 35 NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS CTR DR STE 200, ANDOVER, MA, 01810
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,233,117
Exercised Options: $21,233,117
Current Obligation: $21,233,117
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0318Y
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-08-30
Current End Date: 2017-09-29
Potential End Date: 2017-09-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-06-25
More Contracts from Engility Services, LLC
- 200602!600069!9700!hdtra1!defense Threat Reduction Agency !hdtra105d0003 !A!N! !N!0002 ! !20051123!20061115!064677243!016435559!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Information T!7575 Colshire Drive !MC Lean !va!22102!48376!059!51!mclean !fairfax !virginia !+000013910591!n!n!000000000000!r421!technical Assistance !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!1!001!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $227.6M (Department of Defense)
- Army Rotc Functional Support — $165.8M (Department of Defense)
- Jitc Mission Contract — $163.0M (Department of Defense)
- LAW Enforcement Professional Program — $134.1M (Department of Defense)
- Jitc Mission Contract — $106.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)