CACI-ISS, LLC awarded $17.5M for UMI Training Support, a 1349-day delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,522,376 ($17.5M)

Contractor: Caci-Iss, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-12-21

End Date: 2009-08-31

Contract Duration: 1,349 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: UMI TRAINING SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85670

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $17.5 million to CACI-ISS, LLC for work described as: UMI TRAINING SUPPORT Key points: 1. Value for money assessed through comparison to similar IT training contracts. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competitive bidding process for this IT service. 3. Risk indicators include contract duration and time-and-materials pricing structure. 4. Performance context is within the General Services Administration's IT support domain. 5. Sector positioning is within computer systems design services, a key IT segment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $17.5 million over approximately 3.7 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar IT training and support contracts would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. The time-and-materials pricing, while common for evolving IT needs, can sometimes lead to higher costs if not closely managed compared to fixed-price contracts. However, given the competitive nature, the pricing is likely within a reasonable market range.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating a full and open competition. The presence of 10 bidders suggests a robust level of interest and a healthy competitive environment. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more cost-effective solutions for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process like this one helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal employees and potentially contractors benefit from enhanced UMI training. Services delivered include computer systems design and training support. Geographic impact is primarily in Arizona, where the contract was awarded. Workforce implications involve the potential need for specialized IT training personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and materials pricing can lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
Long contract duration (1349 days) may present challenges in adapting to rapidly changing IT needs.
The specific nature of 'UMI Training Support' requires further definition to fully assess its impact.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition with 10 bidders, indicating strong market interest.
Contract falls under GSA's Federal Acquisition Service, suggesting established procurement processes.
The contract supports essential training functions within the federal IT landscape.

Sector Analysis

This contract operates within the broader IT services sector, specifically focusing on computer systems design and training. The market for IT services is vast and highly competitive, with numerous companies offering specialized support. Benchmarking this contract's value against other IT training and support awards within GSA or other agencies would provide further context on its relative scale and cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further investigation into the award details would be needed to determine if any small business participation was mandated or achieved through subcontracting. Without this information, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains unclear.

Oversight & Accountability

As a GSA Federal Acquisition Service contract, it likely falls under standard GSA oversight mechanisms. The Inspector General's office for GSA would have jurisdiction for audits and investigations. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though specific performance metrics and detailed spending breakdowns may require further inquiry.

Related Government Programs

IT Training Services
Computer Systems Design
Federal IT Support Contracts
GSA Schedule Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to T&M pricing.
Risk of training content becoming outdated over the contract's long duration.
Need for robust government oversight to manage T&M aspects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $17.5 million to CACI-ISS, LLC. UMI TRAINING SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI-ISS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-21. End: 2009-08-31.

What is the specific nature of 'UMI Training Support' and its criticality to the agency's mission?

The provided data identifies the contract as 'UMI TRAINING SUPPORT' under NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services). While the exact nature of 'UMI' is not detailed, it likely refers to a specific training program or system critical for user adoption and proficiency within the agency's IT infrastructure. Such training is crucial for ensuring that federal employees can effectively utilize the technology systems, thereby supporting agency operations and mission delivery. Without more specific information on what 'UMI' entails, its precise criticality is difficult to quantify, but IT training is generally considered essential for maintaining operational efficiency and security.

How does the $17.5 million contract value compare to similar IT training contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

The $17.5 million total award value for UMI Training Support over approximately 3.7 years represents an average annual spend of roughly $4.7 million. To benchmark this effectively, comparisons should be made with other IT training and support contracts, particularly those awarded by GSA's Federal Acquisition Service or other agencies with similar IT needs. Contracts for specialized IT training, system implementation support, or user support services can vary widely in cost depending on scope, duration, and complexity. A preliminary assessment suggests this is a moderately sized contract within the IT services domain, but a detailed comparative analysis with contracts for similar services and durations would be necessary to determine if the pricing is competitive and represents good value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure for this contract?

The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or profit margin. If the scope of work is not well-defined, or if project management is weak on either the government or contractor side, the contractor may incur more hours or use more expensive materials than anticipated, leading to a higher final cost than initially projected. This necessitates robust government oversight, including detailed tracking of labor hours, verification of material costs, and effective scope management to mitigate these risks and ensure fair pricing.

Given the 10 bidders, what does this indicate about the competitiveness of the Computer Systems Design Services market for federal contracts?

The fact that 10 bidders participated in the competition for this delivery order suggests a healthy and competitive market for Computer Systems Design Services within the federal contracting space. A larger number of bidders generally indicates that multiple companies possess the capabilities and are interested in pursuing government contracts of this nature. This level of competition is beneficial for the government as it typically leads to better pricing, higher quality services, and a wider range of innovative solutions. It also suggests that the barriers to entry for qualified firms in this particular segment of the IT services market may not be excessively high, fostering a dynamic environment.

What is the historical spending trend for UMI Training Support or similar services under CACI-ISS, LLC with GSA?

Analyzing historical spending trends for CACI-ISS, LLC with GSA, specifically for UMI Training Support or closely related IT training and computer systems design services, would provide valuable context. Without access to historical contract data beyond this single award, it's impossible to determine if this $17.5 million contract represents an increase, decrease, or consistent level of spending compared to previous engagements. Understanding past performance, contract values, and the duration of prior contracts would help assess CACI-ISS's track record with GSA and identify any patterns in their service delivery or pricing. This information is crucial for evaluating the long-term value and reliability of the contractor.

What are the potential implications of this contract's duration (1349 days) on the adaptability of the training provided?

A contract duration of 1349 days (approximately 3.7 years) for IT training support presents both opportunities and challenges regarding adaptability. On one hand, it provides a stable, long-term engagement, allowing the contractor to develop deep expertise and potentially implement comprehensive, evolving training programs. On the other hand, the rapid pace of technological change in the IT sector means that training content and methodologies can quickly become outdated. The effectiveness of this long-duration contract will depend heavily on built-in mechanisms for updating the curriculum, incorporating new technologies, and adapting to changing user needs and agency priorities throughout its term. Without clear provisions for flexibility and updates, the training could become less relevant over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $56,327,601

Exercised Options: $29,085,245

Current Obligation: $17,522,376

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS09K99BHD0006

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline