GSA's $37.5M vehicle barrier contract with Engility Corporation awarded via competitive delivery order
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,497,711 ($37.5M)
Contractor: Engility Corporation
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2004-04-30
End Date: 2008-01-15
Contract Duration: 1,355 days
Daily Burn Rate: $27.7K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: Other
Official Description: VEHICLE BARRIERS
Place of Performance
Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $37.5 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: VEHICLE BARRIERS Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in physical security infrastructure. 2. The competitive nature of the award suggests potential for favorable pricing. 3. Contract duration of over 3 years indicates a sustained need for these security assets. 4. The specific product classification 'VEHICLE BARRIERS' points to a critical security function. 5. Awarded by the General Services Administration, a key procurement agency for federal entities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award of $37.5 million for vehicle barriers over its period of performance appears reasonable given the nature of security equipment. Without specific per-unit cost data or direct comparisons to similar large-scale barrier procurements, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the competitive award mechanism provides a baseline for assessing price reasonableness. The contract's duration and scope suggest a substantial requirement that, if met effectively, would represent good value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. While not an exhaustive competition, it provides a basis for price discovery and vendor selection. The competitive process likely drove down costs compared to a sole-source award.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by fostering price competition and encouraging vendors to offer their best pricing to secure the contract.
Public Impact
Federal agencies requiring enhanced physical security at facilities benefit from the provision of these vehicle barriers. The services delivered include the supply and potentially installation of critical security equipment. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting various federal installations. The contract supports the manufacturing and supply chain workforce involved in producing security barriers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the barriers.
- Potential for obsolescence of barrier technology over the contract's lifespan.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a critical security need could pose supply chain risks.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process suggests a focus on achieving reasonable pricing.
- Awarded by GSA, indicating adherence to established procurement standards.
- The contract addresses a clear and present need for physical security enhancement.
Sector Analysis
The procurement of vehicle barriers falls within the broader defense and security sector, encompassing physical security solutions. This market includes manufacturers and suppliers of a wide range of security equipment. Spending in this area is often driven by evolving threat landscapes and the need to protect critical infrastructure and personnel. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within federal budgets allocated to facility security and force protection.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not available for this specific delivery order. The contract was awarded to Engility Corporation, a large business. Without specific data, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though large prime contracts often involve subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
As a competitive delivery order issued under a GSA schedule, this contract likely falls under the oversight of GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures would include contract performance monitoring and adherence to the terms of the delivery order. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance details may be less publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Physical Security Equipment Procurement
- GSA Schedule Contracts
- Federal Law Enforcement Support
- Critical Infrastructure Protection
Risk Flags
- Potential NAICS code misclassification
- Lack of detailed technical specifications
Tags
gsa, general-services-administration, engility-corporation, vehicle-barriers, competitive-delivery-order, physical-security, federal-acquisition-service, virginia, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $37.5 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. VEHICLE BARRIERS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-04-30. End: 2008-01-15.
What is the specific type and technical specification of the vehicle barriers procured under this contract?
The provided data indicates the item procured is 'VEHICLE BARRIERS' under North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 315999, which pertains to 'Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing.' This NAICS code appears to be a misclassification for vehicle barriers, which would typically fall under manufacturing of metal products, construction materials, or specialized security equipment. Without further details or the correct NAICS code, the specific technical specifications, materials, and protective capabilities of these barriers cannot be determined. This discrepancy warrants further investigation into the procurement details to ensure accurate classification and understanding of the acquired assets.
How does the $37.5 million total value compare to similar federal procurements for vehicle barriers?
Comparing the $37.5 million total value requires access to data on similar federal procurements for vehicle barriers, including the quantity, type, and duration of those contracts. Without this comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state whether this contract represents a high, low, or average expenditure. However, given that it was awarded competitively, the price achieved is likely reflective of market conditions at the time of award. The duration of the contract (over 3 years) suggests a significant and sustained need, making the total value a reflection of ongoing security requirements rather than a one-time large purchase.
What was the specific performance period and delivery schedule for these vehicle barriers?
The contract had a performance period from April 30, 2004, to January 15, 2008, resulting in a duration of approximately 1355 days, or about 3.7 years. The data does not specify the exact delivery schedule for the vehicle barriers within this period. It is common for such contracts to have phased deliveries based on agency needs or project timelines. The end date of January 15, 2008, indicates the completion of all deliveries and services under this specific contract.
What is Engility Corporation's track record with GSA and similar security-related contracts?
Engility Corporation, prior to its acquisition by SAIC, had a significant presence in government contracting, including work with GSA and other federal agencies. Their portfolio often included services related to IT, engineering, and mission support. While specific details on their track record solely for vehicle barrier contracts are not provided here, their history suggests experience in delivering complex solutions to the federal government. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance reviews, and any reported issues would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their reliability in this specific domain.
Were there any notable risks or challenges identified during the performance of this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly list any risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, common risks associated with procuring physical security equipment can include supply chain disruptions, technological obsolescence, installation complexities, and ensuring compliance with evolving security standards. Without specific reports or contract close-out documentation, it is impossible to identify any unique issues that may have arisen during the execution of this particular vehicle barrier contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing › Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ALARM, SIGNAL, SECURITY DETECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 5TP5704D005
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 3750 CENTERVIEW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $37,497,711
Exercised Options: $37,497,711
Current Obligation: $37,497,711
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F5377P
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-04-30
Current End Date: 2008-01-15
Potential End Date: 2008-01-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-09-20
More Contracts from Engility Corporation
- IT Support for Network Operation and Security Center for Usafcent — $150.8M (General Services Administration)
- [piin: W912cm-05-D-0011-0011] Migrated Award & Mods UP to 0005 — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !naval AIR Warfare Center Trainin!n6133900d0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 Communications Government !3750 Centerview Drive !chantilly !va!20151!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000039861464!n!n!000000000000!6930!operational Training Devices !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!2afx!f-18 Hornet !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!a!u!m!2!002!b! !Z!N!F! ! !n!b!y!n! ! !Z! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $91.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000084!5700!GV68 !esc/Ack !gs35f5396h !C!N! !N!F1962802F8162 !20020409!20040131!081080707!011147928!048341838!n!the Titan Corporation !1900 Campus Commons Drive !reston !va!20191!01375!037!24!andover Estates !ST. Mary S !maryland !+000011005449!n!n!000000000000!r499!other Professional Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $86.3M (Department of Defense)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)