GSA Awards $10.8M for Aircraft Lifecycle Management IT Services to Envisioneering, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,814,707 ($10.8M)

Contractor: Envisioneering, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2006-02-22

End Date: 2009-03-15

Contract Duration: 1,117 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.7K/day

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK IS TO BALANCE SIMO NEEDS AND CAPABILITIES WITH AVAILABLE RESOURCES, AND TO PUT THAT ABILITY INTO THE HANDS OF THE FUNCTIONAL USER. THE SUCCESS OF THIS STRATEGY DEPENDS UPON CONTINUOUS DEFINITION OF REQUIREMENTS AND DISCIPLINED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE INTRICATELY INVOLVED IN THE EVOLUTION OF AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT-RELATED SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE LIFE CYCLE MODEL.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10.8 million to ENVISIONEERING, INC. for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK IS TO BALANCE SIMO NEEDS AND CAPABILITIES WITH AVAILABLE RESOURCES, AND TO PUT THAT ABILITY INTO THE HANDS OF THE FUNCTIONAL USER. THE SUCCESS OF THIS STRATEGY DEPENDS UPON CONTINUOUS DEFINITION OF REQUIREMENTS AND DISCIPLINED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. CONTRAC… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on balancing SIMO needs with resources for aircraft systems. 2. Envisioneering, Inc. will manage IT aspects throughout the aircraft lifecycle. 3. This is a delivery order under a larger contract. 4. The contract duration is 1117 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award is $10.8 million. Without specific unit costs or labor rates, a direct comparison to similar contracts is difficult. The pricing appears to be based on labor hours, which can vary significantly.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition method is not specified, but it's a delivery order, suggesting it might be competed among pre-qualified vendors or awarded under an existing contract. The lack of transparency makes it hard to assess price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer impact is moderate, given the $10.8 million value. Effective management of aircraft lifecycle IT could lead to long-term cost savings, but inefficient execution could increase costs.

Public Impact

Ensures critical aircraft systems are managed effectively through IT. Supports the operational readiness and modernization of military or civilian aircraft. Potential for job creation in IT and aerospace support roles. Impacts the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of aircraft maintenance and upgrades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specified competition method
Limited transparency on pricing structure
Potential for cost overruns if requirements are not tightly managed

Positive Signals

Focus on lifecycle management can lead to long-term efficiencies
Contractor involvement in system evolution is a positive signal
Supports critical national infrastructure (aircraft systems)

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under IT services, specifically Computer Facilities Management Services. The value of $10.8 million for a nearly 3-year duration is within a typical range for specialized IT support in complex sectors like aerospace.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this specific delivery order. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service. Continuous definition of requirements and disciplined systems development are key to accountability.

Related Government Programs

Computer Facilities Management Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Dependency on contractor expertise
Risk of vendor lock-in
Unclear performance benchmarks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10.8 million to ENVISIONEERING, INC.. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK IS TO BALANCE SIMO NEEDS AND CAPABILITIES WITH AVAILABLE RESOURCES, AND TO PUT THAT ABILITY INTO THE HANDS OF THE FUNCTIONAL USER. THE SUCCESS OF THIS STRATEGY DEPENDS UPON CONTINUOUS DEFINITION OF REQUIREMENTS AND DISCIPLINED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE INTRICATELY INVOLVED IN THE EVOLUTION OF AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT-RELATED SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE LIFE CYCLE MODEL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVISIONEERING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-02-22. End: 2009-03-15.

What specific metrics are used to measure the success of balancing SIMO needs and capabilities with available resources?

Success metrics would likely include system uptime, reduction in maintenance downtime, successful integration of new technologies, adherence to budget, and timely completion of project milestones. Performance reviews and user feedback from functional users would also be critical indicators of how well the contractor is meeting the defined requirements and balancing resources.

How does the contractor's involvement in the aircraft lifecycle model mitigate risks associated with evolving technology?

By being involved throughout the lifecycle, the contractor can proactively identify potential technological obsolescence, security vulnerabilities, and integration challenges. This early involvement allows for strategic planning, phased upgrades, and the selection of adaptable technologies, thereby reducing the risk of costly retrofits or system failures due to rapid technological advancements.

What is the estimated return on investment (ROI) for taxpayers from this contract, considering the focus on efficiency and cost-effectiveness?

Quantifying the exact ROI is challenging without baseline data and specific performance targets. However, by ensuring efficient IT management and disciplined systems development for aircraft, the contract aims to reduce operational costs, extend the useful life of assets, and improve mission effectiveness. Savings could manifest in reduced maintenance costs, fewer system failures, and optimized resource allocation over the long term.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 4485 DANUBE DR STE 46, KING GEORGE, VA, 22485

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,814,707

Exercised Options: $10,814,707

Current Obligation: $10,814,707

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F0009N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline