DoD's Naval Research Lab awards $84.2M contract for Electronics and Communication Equipment to Envisioneering Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,444,431 ($25.4M)

Contractor: Envisioneering, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-08-18

End Date: 2011-03-30

Contract Duration: 2,415 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200412!000093!1700!E3220 !NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY !N0017304C2021 !A!N! !N! ! !20040818!20090817!842080921!842080921!842080921!N!ENVISIONEERING INC !4485 DANUBE DRIVE , SUITE !KING GEORGE !VA!22485!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000000934000!N!N!000027326654!AJ43!RDTE/ENGINEERING SCIENCES - ADV TECH DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !A!N!U!2!001!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!Z! ! ! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20375

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.4 million to ENVISIONEERING, INC. for work described as: 200412!000093!1700!E3220 !NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY !N0017304C2021 !A!N! !N! ! !20040818!20090817!842080921!842080921!842080921!N!ENVISIONEERING INC !4485 DANUBE DRIVE , SUITE !KING GEORGE !VA!22485!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DIST… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $84.2 million, was awarded for Electronics and Communication Equipment. 2. Envisioneering Inc. secured this contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is 2415 days, indicating a long-term need. 4. The sector is primarily Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation (RDT&E).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is $84.2 million over approximately 6.6 years. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for similar RDT&E contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it implies efforts were made to secure the best value.

Public Impact

This contract supports advanced technology development for the Navy, potentially enhancing national security. The long duration suggests a sustained requirement for specialized electronic equipment and services. The award to a single entity, Envisioneering Inc., highlights their specialized capabilities in this niche.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
Potential for cost overruns in long-term RDT&E contracts.
Limited visibility into the specific nature of the 'Electronics and Communication Equipment'.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Long contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing requirement.
Supports critical RDT&E for the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically RDT&E for advanced technology development. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority but can be subject to cost fluctuations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration increases exposure to changing technological needs and economic conditions.
Cost-plus contract type carries inherent financial risk for the government.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the summary data.
Potential for scope creep in advanced technology development projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.4 million to ENVISIONEERING, INC.. 200412!000093!1700!E3220 !NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY !N0017304C2021 !A!N! !N! ! !20040818!20090817!842080921!842080921!842080921!N!ENVISIONEERING INC !4485 DANUBE DRIVE , SUITE !KING GEORGE !VA!22485!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000000934000!N!N!000027326654!AJ43!RDTE/ENGINEERING SCIENCES - ADV TECH DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVISIONEERING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-08-18. End: 2011-03-30.

What specific technological advancements or capabilities does this contract aim to achieve for the Naval Research Laboratory?

The contract's focus on 'RDTE/ENGINEERING SCIENCES - ADV TECH DEV' and 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP' suggests it supports the development of next-generation communication systems, sensor technologies, or electronic warfare capabilities. The specific advancements would likely be detailed in the Statement of Work, which is not provided, but the goal is to enhance the Navy's operational effectiveness through cutting-edge technology.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract and Envisioneering Inc.'s performance?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for RDT&E contracts, KPIs would relate to milestones achieved, technological readiness levels, successful prototype development, and adherence to technical specifications. Effective oversight would involve regular reviews against these unstated KPIs to ensure progress and value.

How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract type impact the government's financial risk and the contractor's incentive for cost control?

A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. This shifts significant financial risk to the government, as costs can exceed initial estimates. While the fixed fee provides some incentive for efficiency, it may be less pronounced than in fixed-price contracts, requiring robust government oversight to manage costs effectively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › General Science and Technology R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4485 DANUBE DRIVE , SUITE, KING GEORGE, VA, 22485

Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,444,431

Exercised Options: $25,444,431

Current Obligation: $25,444,431

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline