Gsa's $39M State Dept. Fastc A/E Design Contract Awarded to Kierantimberlake LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,997,320 ($39.0M)

Contractor: Kierantimberlake LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2014-10-31

End Date: 2021-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,526 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 39

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Architecture

Official Description: TAS::19 0112::TAS IGF::OT::IGF A/E DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE DEPT. OF STATE, FOREIGN AFFAIRS SECURITY TRAINING CENTER (FASTC) IN BLACKSTONE, VA

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19130

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $39.0 million to KIERANTIMBERLAKE LLC for work described as: TAS::19 0112::TAS IGF::OT::IGF A/E DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE DEPT. OF STATE, FOREIGN AFFAIRS SECURITY TRAINING CENTER (FASTC) IN BLACKSTONE, VA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to KIERANTIMBERLAKE LLC for architectural services at the FASTC facility. 2. The contract value is $38,997,319.50, with a duration of 2526 days. 3. This represents a significant investment in security training infrastructure. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's firm fixed price structure suggests a clear understanding of project scope and costs. Benchmarking against similar large-scale architectural design contracts for government facilities would provide further insight into its value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The award was made through full and open competition, indicating a broad solicitation of potential bidders. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is expected to yield a fair price for the taxpayer, ensuring value for the investment in the FASTC facility.

Public Impact

Enhances security training capabilities for the Department of State. Supports infrastructure development in Blackstone, VA. Potential for job creation in architectural and construction sectors. Ensures compliance with security and operational requirements for foreign affairs personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration is extensive, requiring careful monitoring for scope creep or delays.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Supports critical national security training infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the architectural services sector, specifically supporting government infrastructure projects. Spending in this area is often driven by national security, modernization, and facility upgrades, with significant federal investment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the prime contractor is KIERANTIMBERLAKE LLC, a large business. There is no explicit information on small business subcontracting participation within this data snippet.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA), through its Public Buildings Service, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight will be crucial to ensure project delivery aligns with objectives and budget.

Related Government Programs

Architectural Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Extensive contract duration may increase risk of scope creep.
Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting design and cost.
Dependence on a single prime contractor for critical design services.
Need for vigilant oversight to ensure quality and adherence to security standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $39.0 million to KIERANTIMBERLAKE LLC. TAS::19 0112::TAS IGF::OT::IGF A/E DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE DEPT. OF STATE, FOREIGN AFFAIRS SECURITY TRAINING CENTER (FASTC) IN BLACKSTONE, VA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KIERANTIMBERLAKE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-10-31. End: 2021-09-30.

What is the estimated cost per square foot for the architectural design services provided under this contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar government facilities?

Without detailed project scope and square footage, calculating a precise per-square-foot cost is not feasible from the provided data. However, the total contract value of $38.9M for A/E design services for a security training center suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking would require comparing this to similar large-scale, specialized government facility designs, considering factors like complexity, security requirements, and location.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of KIERANTIMBERLAKE LLC's architectural design services, and what mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks associated with d

Success metrics likely include adherence to design specifications, compliance with building codes and security standards, timely delivery of design milestones, and client satisfaction. Risk mitigation strategies may involve phased reviews, clear change order processes, and performance incentives or penalties outlined in the contract to manage potential design changes or delays effectively.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the government secured the most cost-effective and technically superior architectural design solution for the FASTC facility?

The full and open competition process theoretically maximizes the chances of securing the best value by allowing all qualified firms to bid. Its effectiveness in this case hinges on the quality of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the competitiveness of the bids received. A thorough post-award analysis of the winning proposal against others would confirm the extent of cost-effectiveness and technical superiority achieved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: GS-03P-12-DX-C-0039

Offers Received: 39

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 420 N 20TH ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 19130

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,067,372

Exercised Options: $38,997,320

Current Obligation: $38,997,320

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline