GSA's $25.2M Custom House Renovation Contract Awarded to Grunley Construction for Envelope Restoration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,223,460 ($25.2M)
Contractor: Grunley Construction CO., Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2010-03-10
End Date: 2012-09-14
Contract Duration: 919 days
Daily Burn Rate: $27.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: TAS::47 4543::TAS. RECOVERY CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE ENVELOPE RENOVATION PROJECT. U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE, 200 CHESTNUT STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2912.
Place of Performance
Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19106
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $25.2 million to GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: TAS::47 4543::TAS. RECOVERY CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE ENVELOPE RENOVATION PROJECT. U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE, 200 CHESTNUT STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2912. Key points: 1. Contract value of $25.2 million for a significant building envelope renovation. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type indicates defined costs and risk allocation. 4. Project duration of 919 days highlights the scale and complexity of the renovation. 5. Located in Philadelphia, PA, impacting a historic federal property. 6. The contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $25.2 million for a major building envelope renovation appears reasonable given the scope of work on a historic federal building. Without specific benchmarks for similar historic building restorations in Philadelphia, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government has a clear understanding of costs and has transferred significant cost risk to the contractor. The duration of 919 days also implies a substantial project, justifying the awarded amount.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 5 bids (no) suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing for the services rendered.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through multiple bidders vying for the contract, leading to potentially lower overall project costs.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the federal government and the General Services Administration (GSA) through the preservation and modernization of a critical federal asset. The services delivered include comprehensive renovation of the U.S. Custom House envelope, ensuring structural integrity and potentially improving energy efficiency. The geographic impact is localized to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, specifically at 200 Chestnut Street. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction trades, project managers, and support staff involved in the renovation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen structural issues arise during renovation of a historic building.
- Delays in project completion could impact the usability of the federal facility.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract limits the government's exposure to cost increases.
- Full and open competition suggests a thorough vetting of potential contractors and pricing.
- The project aims to preserve a historic federal building, ensuring its long-term viability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The market for large-scale federal building renovations is significant, driven by the need to maintain and modernize aging government infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other GSA renovation projects or similar large-scale public works contracts, considering factors like building age, size, and complexity of the required work.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside (ss:false, sb:false). Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal. However, the prime contractor, Grunley Construction Co., Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the work, contributing indirectly to the small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of any subcontracting to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. Mechanisms likely include regular progress reports, site inspections, and contract performance reviews. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms, which penalize the contractor for cost overruns. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public contract databases, though specific details of ongoing oversight might not be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Renovations
- Historic Preservation Projects
- GSA Capital Investments
- Infrastructure Modernization
Risk Flags
- Potential for unforeseen conditions in historic building renovation
- Risk of weather-related delays impacting schedule
- Need for specialized materials and techniques for historic preservation
Tags
construction, renovation, building-envelope, historic-preservation, general-services-administration, philadelphia, pennsylvania, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-institutional-building-construction, federal-property
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $25.2 million to GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. TAS::47 4543::TAS. RECOVERY CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE ENVELOPE RENOVATION PROJECT. U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE, 200 CHESTNUT STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2912.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-03-10. End: 2012-09-14.
What is Grunley Construction Co., Inc.'s track record with the General Services Administration on similar renovation projects?
Grunley Construction Co., Inc. has a history of working with the GSA on various construction and renovation projects. While specific details on past envelope renovation projects for historic buildings are not provided in this data snippet, their experience with the GSA suggests familiarity with federal contracting procedures and requirements. A deeper dive into GSA's contract database or past performance reviews would be necessary to fully assess their track record on similar projects, including on-time completion, budget adherence, and quality of work. Their ability to win this $25.2 million contract under full and open competition implies a competitive standing and likely a satisfactory performance history with the agency.
How does the $25.2 million contract value compare to similar building envelope renovations for historic federal properties?
Benchmarking the $25.2 million contract value against similar projects requires access to a database of comparable federal building renovations, considering factors like square footage, age of the building, specific scope of work (e.g., facade restoration, window replacement, roofing), and geographic location. Historic buildings often incur higher costs due to specialized materials, preservation techniques, and unforeseen conditions. Without specific comparable data, it's difficult to definitively state if this value is high or low. However, the firm fixed-price nature and the 919-day duration suggest a substantial and complex undertaking, making the awarded amount plausible for a project of this scale and nature.
What are the primary risks associated with renovating the U.S. Custom House envelope, and how are they mitigated?
Key risks in renovating a historic building's envelope include the discovery of unforeseen structural issues, hazardous materials (like asbestos or lead paint), and damage to delicate historic fabric during the work. Weather-related delays are also a significant risk, especially for exterior work. The firm fixed-price contract structure mitigates financial risk for the government by capping costs. Mitigation strategies employed by the contractor would likely include thorough pre-construction surveys, detailed planning, use of specialized preservation techniques, contingency planning for unexpected findings, and robust project management to adhere to the schedule and minimize weather impacts.
How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this specific renovation project?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks are understood. For the U.S. Custom House envelope renovation, the FFP structure transfers the risk of cost overruns to Grunley Construction Co., Inc. This incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently and complete the project within the agreed-upon price. While it can lead to higher initial bids to account for contractor risk, it provides budget certainty for the GSA and prevents unexpected cost increases. The effectiveness hinges on the accuracy of the initial scope definition and the contractor's ability to execute the work within budget.
What is the historical spending pattern for building envelope renovations by the GSA, and does this contract align?
Historical spending patterns for GSA building envelope renovations vary widely based on the number, size, age, and complexity of the buildings in their portfolio. GSA manages a vast inventory of federal buildings, many of which are historic and require significant maintenance. This $25.2 million contract for the U.S. Custom House represents a substantial investment in a single property. To determine alignment, one would need to analyze GSA's aggregate spending on similar renovation projects over several fiscal years. This contract appears to be a significant, but potentially typical, investment for a major renovation of a historic federal landmark, reflecting ongoing efforts to preserve and modernize federal assets.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: GS-03P-09-AZ-C-0051
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 15020 SHADY GROVE RD STE 500, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,223,460
Exercised Options: $25,223,460
Current Obligation: $25,223,460
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-03-10
Current End Date: 2012-09-14
Potential End Date: 2012-09-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-01
More Contracts from Grunley Construction CO., Inc.
- Eeob Modernization, Phase III — $212.9M (General Services Administration)
- Design-Build of Historic Center Building, ST Elizabeths West Campus, SE, Wash., DC / Project Funded — $206.4M (General Services Administration)
- Contracting Officer Authority WAS Transferred to Bonnie Echoloes — $205.7M (General Services Administration)
- Phase II, State Place Modernization — $166.8M (General Services Administration)
- Design/Build-Briding Services for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Headquarters Renovation Project — $144.9M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)