Air Force awards $30.8M cloud services contract to RAFT LLC for Kessel Run integration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,776,742 ($30.8M)

Contractor: Raft LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-01-14

End Date: 2026-07-13

Contract Duration: 545 days

Daily Burn Rate: $56.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: THIS EFFORT WILL PROVIDE THE AIR FORCE WITH A CLOUD CITI SERVICES TEAM WHICH WILL FEATURE STRATEGIC TEAM MEMBERS INTEGRATED WITH THE KESSEL RUN TEAMS TO SUPPORT A CULTURE OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT ACROSS THE TEAMS.

Place of Performance

Location: HANSCOM AFB, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01731

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.8 million to RAFT LLC for work described as: THIS EFFORT WILL PROVIDE THE AIR FORCE WITH A CLOUD CITI SERVICES TEAM WHICH WILL FEATURE STRATEGIC TEAM MEMBERS INTEGRATED WITH THE KESSEL RUN TEAMS TO SUPPORT A CULTURE OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT ACROSS THE TEAMS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on integrating strategic team members with Kessel Run teams to foster continuous improvement. 2. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 3. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 4. The duration of the contract is approximately 1.5 years. 5. The contractor, RAFT LLC, is a new entity in federal contracting. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541511 for Custom Computer Programming Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $30.8 million for a 545-day period, averaging approximately $56,471 per day, requires careful scrutiny. As a Time and Materials contract, the final cost is not fixed and depends on the hours worked and rates charged. Benchmarking this against similar cloud services or custom programming contracts is difficult without more detailed service descriptions and labor categories. The absence of a pre-negotiated ceiling or fixed price elements raises concerns about potential cost overruns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. While sole-source awards can be justified under specific circumstances, they limit the opportunity for competitive bidding and potentially higher prices. The lack of competition means the government did not benefit from a marketplace-driven price discovery process.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices. This limits the government's ability to secure the best possible value for the services rendered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the U.S. Air Force, specifically the Kessel Run program, which aims to modernize its software development and deployment capabilities. The services delivered will support the integration of cloud computing services and strategic team members. This effort is expected to enhance the Air Force's ability to achieve continuous improvement in its IT operations. The contract may indirectly impact the workforce by potentially requiring new skill sets or team structures within the Air Force's IT divisions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader IT services sector, specifically focusing on custom computer programming and cloud services. The federal IT services market is substantial, with significant spending allocated to software development, cloud migration, and cybersecurity. Contracts like this are crucial for agencies seeking to modernize legacy systems and adopt agile development practices. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale IT integration and cloud services contracts awarded to similar-sized companies within the defense sector.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to RAFT LLC, whose size and small business status are not specified here, means that opportunities for small business participation are not explicitly mandated by this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if RAFT LLC itself is a small business or if it intends to subcontract to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Air Force. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle (likely a General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule or similar IDIQ), the underlying contract vehicle may have its own oversight mechanisms. Transparency regarding performance metrics and expenditures would depend on reporting requirements within the contract and agency policies. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it, defense, air-force, cloud-services, custom-computer-programming, time-and-materials, sole-source, delivery-order, raft-llc, kessel-run, massachusetts, dod

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.8 million to RAFT LLC. THIS EFFORT WILL PROVIDE THE AIR FORCE WITH A CLOUD CITI SERVICES TEAM WHICH WILL FEATURE STRATEGIC TEAM MEMBERS INTEGRATED WITH THE KESSEL RUN TEAMS TO SUPPORT A CULTURE OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT ACROSS THE TEAMS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAFT LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-01-14. End: 2026-07-13.

What is the track record of RAFT LLC in performing federal contracts, particularly those involving cloud services and system integration?

Based on the provided data, RAFT LLC is the contractor for this effort. However, the data does not offer specific details about RAFT LLC's prior federal contracting experience, past performance on similar projects, or its overall track record. A thorough assessment would require accessing federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review RAFT LLC's contract history, including the types of services rendered, contract values, performance ratings, and any past issues or disputes. Without this information, it is difficult to gauge their capability and reliability for this specific $30.8 million cloud services contract.

How does the estimated daily cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar cloud integration services?

The contract is valued at $30,776,741.89 for a duration of 545 days, resulting in an approximate daily cost of $56,471. Benchmarking this figure against industry standards for cloud integration services is challenging without more granular data on the specific services, labor categories, and rates involved. Time and Materials contracts, by nature, have variable costs. However, if this daily rate represents an average blended rate for a team of consultants, it would need to be compared to rates for comparable roles (e.g., cloud architects, senior developers, project managers) in the Washington D.C. or relevant geographic market. Generally, high-level IT consulting and integration services can range significantly, but this daily rate appears substantial and warrants a detailed comparison with market data for similar skill sets and project complexity.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source Time and Materials contract for cloud services?

A sole-source Time and Materials (T&M) contract for cloud services presents several key risks. Firstly, the lack of competition inherent in a sole-source award means the government may not be achieving the most cost-effective solution, as there's no competitive pressure to drive down prices. Secondly, the T&M structure, while offering flexibility, lacks a cost ceiling and can lead to cost overruns if not meticulously managed. The contractor is reimbursed for actual labor hours and material costs, creating an incentive to extend project timelines or bill for more hours. For cloud services, this could translate to unexpected increases in labor costs or charges for resources that might have been optimized under a fixed-price or performance-based contract. Effective oversight and detailed reporting are critical to mitigate these risks.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the Air Force's Kessel Run program and its overall cloud strategy?

This contract is intended to provide the Air Force with a Cloud Citi Services Team that will integrate with existing Kessel Run teams. The primary goal is to support a culture of continuous improvement across these teams. This suggests the contract aims to enhance the operational efficiency, agility, and effectiveness of the Kessel Run program, which is a key initiative for modernizing the Air Force's software development and deployment capabilities. By embedding strategic team members, the contract seeks to foster better collaboration, knowledge transfer, and adoption of best practices in cloud services. The expected impact is a more streamlined and improved cloud service delivery model, contributing to the Air Force's broader cloud strategy and digital transformation efforts.

How does this contract's value and duration compare to previous Air Force investments in similar cloud integration services?

The provided data indicates a contract value of approximately $30.8 million with a duration of about 1.5 years (545 days). To compare this to previous Air Force investments, one would need to analyze historical spending data for similar cloud integration, custom programming, or IT modernization efforts within the Air Force. This would involve searching procurement databases for contracts with comparable NAICS codes (like 541511), service descriptions, and contract types (especially T&M or hybrid models). Without access to that historical data, it's difficult to definitively state whether this contract represents a significant increase, decrease, or is in line with past spending patterns. However, given the ongoing trend of cloud adoption and IT modernization across the DoD, such investments are generally expected to be substantial.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesCustom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 400, RESTON, VA, 20191

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,068,632

Exercised Options: $36,158,678

Current Obligation: $30,776,742

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA830721G0020

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-01-14

Current End Date: 2026-07-13

Potential End Date: 2027-01-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-13

More Contracts from Raft LLC

View all Raft LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending