Air Force awards $137.6M for F110 engines, impacting aircraft readiness and defense manufacturing
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $137,635,762 ($137.6M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-04-28
End Date: 2023-11-30
Contract Duration: 1,311 days
Daily Burn Rate: $105.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: F110 QATAR II ENGINES COVID-19 DIB
Place of Performance
Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45215
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $137.6 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: F110 QATAR II ENGINES COVID-19 DIB Key points: 1. Contract supports critical aircraft engine components, ensuring operational readiness. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about price competition and potential cost savings. 3. Long contract duration (3 years) suggests a sustained need for these engines. 4. Awarded to General Electric, a major player in the aerospace and defense sector. 5. Focus on COVID-19 DIB indicates a potential link to supply chain resilience efforts. 6. Fixed-price contract shifts some cost risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $137.6 million for F110 engines is substantial. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparable contract benchmarks, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the sole-source nature of the award suggests limited opportunity for competitive pricing, which could lead to higher costs than if the contract were competed. The fixed-price type offers some cost certainty, but the overall value hinges on the negotiated price against market rates for these specialized engines.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, General Electric Company, was considered. This limits the government's ability to leverage competition to drive down prices and ensure the best possible value. The rationale for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or a lack of viable alternatives. The absence of competition means taxpayers may not benefit from the cost efficiencies that a competitive bidding process could yield.
Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award means taxpayers may be paying a premium, as there was no competitive pressure to reduce the price. This limits the government's leverage in price negotiations.
Public Impact
Enhances the operational capability of Air Force aircraft reliant on F110 engines. Supports the defense industrial base, particularly in aircraft engine manufacturing. Contributes to national security by ensuring the availability of critical military assets. Potentially impacts the workforce employed by General Electric in engine production and maintenance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in the sole-source justification requires scrutiny.
- Long contract duration could mask inefficiencies if not closely monitored.
- Dependence on a single supplier for critical components poses supply chain risk.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract provides cost predictability for the government.
- Award supports a key defense contractor, maintaining domestic manufacturing capabilities.
- Contract addresses a critical need for aircraft engine components, ensuring operational readiness.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing sector, a critical component of the aerospace and defense industry. This sector is characterized by high barriers to entry, significant R&D investment, and a limited number of major global players, including General Electric. The market size for military aircraft engines is substantial, driven by defense budgets worldwide. This specific award for F110 engines supports a widely used platform, indicating its importance within the broader defense spending landscape.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. Furthermore, the 'ss' (small business subcontracting) is also false. This suggests that small businesses are unlikely to be directly involved as prime contractors or through mandatory subcontracting opportunities on this specific award. The primary beneficiary is the large prime contractor, General Electric.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force and potentially the Department of Defense's Inspector General. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides some level of cost control, but ongoing monitoring of performance, delivery schedules, and adherence to contract terms is crucial. Transparency regarding the sole-source justification and any subsequent modifications would be key areas for oversight.
Related Government Programs
- F110 Engine Support Contracts
- Air Force Aircraft Maintenance and Repair
- Defense Industrial Base Sustainment
- Aerospace Manufacturing Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for cost overruns due to lack of competition
- Long contract duration increases exposure to market volatility
Tags
defense, air-force, aircraft-engines, sole-source, fixed-price, large-contract, covid-19-response, defense-industrial-base, general-electric, ohio
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $137.6 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. F110 QATAR II ENGINES COVID-19 DIB
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $137.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-04-28. End: 2023-11-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for F110 engines by the Department of Defense?
Historical spending on F110 engines by the Department of Defense (DoD) indicates a consistent and significant investment over many years, reflecting the engine's widespread use in various Air Force and Navy aircraft platforms, such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-15 Eagle. While specific aggregate figures for F110 engines alone are not readily available in public databases without detailed searches, the DoD's overall budget for aircraft procurement and sustainment runs into billions annually. Contracts for engines and related parts are recurring, often awarded through competitive processes or, as in this case, sole-source mechanisms for specific variants or sustainment needs. The 'COVID-19 DIB' designation suggests a recent focus on supply chain resilience, potentially influencing the structure and urgency of recent awards compared to historical patterns.
How does the pricing of this sole-source contract compare to potentially competitive bids?
Directly comparing the pricing of this sole-source contract to hypothetical competitive bids is challenging without access to proprietary pricing data or market analysis reports. However, the fundamental principle of sole-source procurement is that it bypasses the price discovery mechanism inherent in open competition. This typically means the government accepts the price proposed by the single source, which may be higher than what could be achieved through multiple bids. Factors influencing the price include General Electric's established costs, profit margins, the specific terms of the F110 engine variant, and any unique requirements like the 'COVID-19 DIB' designation. Without competitive benchmarks, it's difficult to definitively state if the price represents optimal value for taxpayers.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical aircraft engines?
The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical aircraft engines like the F110 include: 1. **Higher Costs:** Lack of competition can lead to inflated prices as the contractor faces less pressure to offer the most competitive rate. 2. **Reduced Innovation:** Without competitive pressure, there may be less incentive for the sole provider to innovate or improve efficiency. 3. **Supplier Lock-in:** The government becomes dependent on a single supplier, making it difficult and costly to switch providers in the future, even if performance or price becomes unsatisfactory. 4. **Supply Chain Vulnerability:** Reliance on a single source can create significant vulnerabilities if that supplier experiences production issues, financial instability, or geopolitical disruptions. The 'COVID-19 DIB' designation hints at awareness of such supply chain risks.
What is the significance of the 'COVID-19 DIB' designation on this contract?
The 'COVID-19 DIB' designation likely signifies that this contract is intended to support the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) and is being awarded in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on supply chains. This could mean several things: the contract might be prioritized to ensure the continued production of critical components despite pandemic-related disruptions, or it could be part of a broader government initiative to strengthen the resilience of the DIB against future crises. Awarding funds under this designation might also imply a focus on maintaining production capacity, workforce stability, or sourcing critical materials within the United States to mitigate risks exposed by the pandemic. It suggests an effort to ensure the availability of essential defense articles.
How does the duration of this contract (over 3 years) impact its overall value and risk profile?
The contract's duration of approximately 3 years (from April 2020 to November 2023) has several implications for its value and risk profile. A longer duration can provide greater stability and predictability for both the government and the contractor, potentially leading to better planning and resource allocation. For the government, it ensures a consistent supply of critical F110 engine components over an extended period. However, a longer contract term also increases the exposure to potential price increases if market conditions change unfavorably, although the fixed-price nature mitigates this to some extent. It also extends the period of reliance on a sole-source provider, amplifying the risks associated with supplier lock-in and potential supply chain disruptions if not managed proactively.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 NEUMANN WAY, CINCINNATI, OH, 45215
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $137,635,762
Exercised Options: $137,635,762
Current Obligation: $137,635,762
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 71
Total Subaward Amount: $389,901,784
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862618D0029
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-04-28
Current End Date: 2023-11-30
Potential End Date: 2023-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-11-01
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)