DoD's $36.3M Environmental Consulting Contract with Concurrent Technologies Corp. Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $36,302,532 ($36.3M)

Contractor: Concurrent Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-12-01

End Date: 2010-05-31

Contract Duration: 2,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: LABOR (A&AS) (BASE)

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $36.3 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: LABOR (A&AS) (BASE) Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $36.3 million over its duration. 2. Concurrent Technologies Corp. secured this contract. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Air Force, indicating a defense sector focus. 4. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks. 5. Environmental Consulting Services (NAICS 541620) is the primary service.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were utilized through a competitive process, aiming for value, but the T&M structure warrants vigilance to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Public Impact

Environmental consulting services are crucial for military base operations and compliance. The duration of the contract (2004-2010) suggests a long-term need for these services. The Department of the Air Force relies on external expertise for specialized environmental tasks. Potential for follow-on contracts or similar services for other branches or bases.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials pricing can lead to uncontrolled costs.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.
Long contract duration may not reflect current market efficiencies.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Services provided by a specialized firm.
Supports critical environmental compliance for the Air Force.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically environmental consulting. Spending in this area is often driven by regulatory compliance and operational needs, with benchmarks varying widely based on project scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically involve contract officers and technical representatives monitoring performance, costs, and adherence to the Statement of Work. The Time and Materials nature necessitates rigorous oversight to prevent cost creep.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Time and Materials pricing structure.
Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Potential for cost overruns without strict oversight.
Long contract duration may not reflect current market conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $36.3 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. LABOR (A&AS) (BASE)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $36.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-12-01. End: 2010-05-31.

What was the average hourly rate charged under this Time and Materials contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for environmental consulting services during the contract period?

Without access to the specific hourly rates and labor categories billed under this Time and Materials contract, a direct comparison to industry benchmarks is not possible. However, T&M contracts inherently carry a risk of higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not meticulously managed and monitored for efficiency and necessity of labor hours.

What specific environmental consulting services were provided, and were there any performance issues or cost overruns reported during the contract's execution?

The provided data identifies the service as 'Environmental Consulting Services' (NAICS 541620) but lacks specifics on the tasks performed. Performance issues or cost overruns are not detailed in this summary. A review of contract performance reports and modification history would be necessary to assess these aspects.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for the government, considering the Time and Materials pricing structure?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging broad participation and competitive bidding. While it sets a strong foundation for price discovery, the Time and Materials structure requires diligent oversight post-award to ensure the initially competitive rates translate into cost-effective service delivery throughout the contract's life.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 CTC DR, JOHNSTOWN, PA, 15904

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $36,302,569

Exercised Options: $36,302,569

Current Obligation: $36,302,532

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0153L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline