DoD's $81M R&D Contract with General Dynamics: A Decade of Research and Development

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $81,236,742 ($81.2M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-07-19

End Date: 2016-09-06

Contract Duration: 3,702 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: AVE

Place of Performance

Location: SCOTTSDALE, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85257

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $81.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: AVE Key points: 1. Significant investment in R&D, indicating a focus on technological advancement. 2. Sole awardee, General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc., suggests specialized capabilities. 3. Long contract duration (3702 days) implies complex, ongoing project requirements. 4. No small business participation noted, potentially limiting broader economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Without specific benchmarks for similar R&D efforts, assessing value is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

While advertised as full and open, the single award to General Dynamics suggests they were the only viable bidder or possessed unique qualifications. This limits price discovery through competitive bidding.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were directed towards a single entity for a decade, raising questions about whether competitive pressures ensured the best possible price for the research conducted.

Public Impact

Long-term commitment to a single contractor for advanced research. Potential for technological breakthroughs funded by taxpayers. Lack of transparency on specific deliverables and outcomes over the contract's lifespan.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. Spending in this sector is crucial for national security and technological innovation, but often involves high uncertainty and long development cycles.

Small Business Impact

The contract explicitly states no small business participation. This indicates that the scope of work or required expertise was likely beyond the capacity of most small businesses, or they were not actively sought.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration and cost-plus-fixed-fee nature of this contract warrant close oversight to ensure funds are used efficiently and effectively towards defined research objectives.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $81.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.. AVE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $81.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-07-19. End: 2016-09-06.

What specific technological advancements or research outcomes were achieved through this $81 million investment over nearly ten years?

The provided data lacks specific details on the research outcomes. A comprehensive review would require access to project reports, milestone achievements, and final deliverables to assess the tangible benefits and return on investment for the taxpayer. Without this, the value remains qualitative.

Given the full and open competition, why did only one contractor, General Dynamics, ultimately receive this significant R&D award?

While advertised as full and open, the single award suggests General Dynamics possessed unique qualifications, proprietary technology, or was the only entity capable of meeting the stringent requirements. This could indicate a lack of market competition for this specific niche or a highly specialized requirement.

How effectively was taxpayer money utilized under this cost-plus-fixed-fee contract to achieve the intended research and development goals?

The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure inherently carries risk of cost escalation. Effective utilization depends heavily on robust oversight, clear performance metrics, and stringent management by the contracting agency to ensure the fixed fee remained appropriate and costs were controlled.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp

Address: 8201 E MCDOWELL ROAD, SCOTTSDALE, AZ, 85257

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $59,962,908

Exercised Options: $79,286,042

Current Obligation: $81,236,742

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-07-19

Current End Date: 2016-09-06

Potential End Date: 2016-09-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-06-29

More Contracts from General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending