DoD's $18.6M environmental services contract to ICF Inc. awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,642,940 ($18.6M)

Contractor: ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-10-01

End Date: 2026-10-13

Contract Duration: 1,473 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE LEVEL OF EFFORT

Sector: Other

Official Description: CENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT (CEMS) SERVICES IN CENTCOM AND CONUS LOCATIONS.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.6 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. for work described as: CENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT (CEMS) SERVICES IN CENTCOM AND CONUS LOCATIONS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, ICF Incorporated, L.L.C., for environmental management support. 2. The contract has a duration of 1473 days, spanning from October 2022 to October 2026. 3. This is a fixed-price level of effort contract, indicating a defined scope of work. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The contract covers services in CENTCOM and CONUS locations, indicating a broad geographic scope. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541330 for Engineering Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value is $18.6 million over approximately four years. Benchmarking this against similar environmental consulting contracts for large federal agencies is challenging without more specific service details. However, the fixed-price level of effort structure suggests that the government has a defined scope and expects predictable costs. The award to a single contractor implies that ICF was deemed the best value through the competitive process. Further analysis would require comparing ICF's proposed rates and the overall cost to similar contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other agencies for comparable environmental management services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' which means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data indicates there were 3 bids received. This level of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing. The fact that multiple bids were submitted suggests that the market for these services is robust enough to support competition, which can lead to better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. The presence of multiple bidders indicates that the government likely secured a fair price for the environmental management services.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from comprehensive environmental management support across its CENTCOM and CONUS locations. Services delivered likely include environmental assessments, compliance monitoring, hazardous waste management, and remediation planning. The geographic scope covers both overseas (CENTCOM) and domestic (CONUS) military installations. The contract supports a workforce of environmental scientists, engineers, and technicians, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in these fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The environmental consulting services sector is a significant part of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. Federal agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, are major clients due to extensive land holdings, operational footprints, and regulatory compliance requirements. This contract fits within the engineering services sub-sector, focusing on environmental compliance, management, and potentially remediation. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large federal contracts for environmental support services, often awarded to large engineering and environmental firms.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and there is no mention of small business set-asides (ss). This suggests that the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Consequently, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside requirement. The primary contractor, ICF Incorporated, L.L.C., is likely a large business, and any subcontracting would be at their discretion, not mandated by a set-aside provision.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are built into the fixed-price level of effort contract structure, requiring the contractor to deliver defined services. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, environmental-services, engineering-services, fixed-price-level-of-effort, full-and-open-competition, icf-incorporated, centcom, conus, air-force, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.6 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C.. CENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT (CEMS) SERVICES IN CENTCOM AND CONUS LOCATIONS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-10-01. End: 2026-10-13.

What is ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.'s track record with the Department of Defense for similar environmental services?

ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. has a substantial history of performing contracts for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies, often in the realm of environmental consulting, engineering, and management. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts would involve reviewing contract databases for awards related to environmental compliance, hazardous waste management, site remediation, and environmental planning. Key indicators of their track record would include past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the successful completion of previous large-scale environmental projects for the DoD. A review of their portfolio would likely reveal experience in managing complex environmental challenges across various military installations, both domestically and potentially overseas, aligning with the scope of this current contract.

How does the estimated cost per day for this contract compare to industry benchmarks for environmental management services?

The total contract value is approximately $18.6 million over 1473 days. This equates to roughly $12,627 per day. Benchmarking this figure requires careful consideration of the specific services provided, the geographic locations (CENTCOM vs. CONUS), and the complexity of the environmental issues addressed. General industry benchmarks for environmental consulting can vary widely, from a few hundred dollars per day for basic assessments to several thousand dollars per day for highly specialized engineering, remediation, or compliance management. Given the broad scope implied by 'CENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT' across diverse locations, this daily rate appears to be within a reasonable range for a large federal contract, assuming it encompasses a significant level of technical expertise and management oversight. A more precise comparison would necessitate detailed service breakdowns and market rate data for comparable federal contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with managing environmental services across both CENTCOM and CONUS locations?

Managing environmental services across both CENTCOM (which includes areas in the Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia) and CONUS (Continental United States) presents several significant risks. Logistical challenges are paramount, involving the coordination of personnel, equipment, and resources across vast distances and potentially different regulatory environments. Security risks are heightened in CENTCOM locations, requiring specialized protocols and personnel vetting. Furthermore, navigating the diverse environmental regulations and compliance standards in different countries within CENTCOM, as well as varying state and federal regulations within CONUS, adds complexity and the risk of non-compliance. Cultural and political factors in overseas locations can also impact project execution. Finally, the cost of operations, including travel, per diem, and specialized equipment, can escalate rapidly, posing a financial risk if not meticulously managed.

What does the 'Fixed Price Level of Effort' contract type imply about the government's expectations and risk allocation?

A 'Fixed Price Level of Effort' (FPLE) contract type signifies that the government has a defined scope of work and expects the contractor to expend a specific level of effort (e.g., labor hours) to achieve it. The total price is fixed, but the contractor is paid based on the effort expended, up to the agreed-upon level. This structure implies that the government has a good understanding of the required work but may not have precise control over the exact quantity of services needed. The risk is shared: the government bears the risk of paying for a certain level of effort regardless of the final outcome if the effort is inefficiently applied, while the contractor bears the risk of not being able to complete the required scope within the allocated effort or if costs exceed expectations for that effort level. It aims to balance cost certainty for the government with flexibility in service delivery.

How does the number of bids (3) influence the potential for cost savings for the taxpayer?

Receiving three bids for this contract is generally a positive indicator for taxpayer savings. Three bidders suggest a reasonably competitive market where multiple companies were willing and able to compete for the work. In a competitive environment, each bidder is incentivized to offer their best pricing and technical solution to win the contract. This competition typically drives down the overall price compared to a sole-source or limited-source award. While three bids are better than one or two, a higher number of bidders could potentially lead to even greater price reductions. However, the quality of the bids and the specific nature of the services also play a crucial role; a well-defined requirement and a thorough evaluation process are essential to ensure that the lowest price also represents the best overall value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: FA489022R0040

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE LEVEL OF EFFORT (B)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: ICF International, Inc.

Address: 1902 RESTON METRO PLAZA, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,341,488

Exercised Options: $19,869,177

Current Obligation: $18,642,940

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU119

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-10-01

Current End Date: 2026-10-13

Potential End Date: 2028-04-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-10-16

More Contracts from ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.

View all ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending