DoD awards $33.6M Facilities Support Services contract to ASRC Federal Gulf State Constructors LLC for Sheppard AFB

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,569,440 ($33.6M)

Contractor: Asrc Federal Gulf State Constructors LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-08-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $46.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: COMPREHENSIVE BASE OPERATION SUPPORT (BOS) FUNCTIONS IAW THE PWS FOR SHEPPARD AFB, TO INCLUDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, REAL PROPERTY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, AND ALL RELATED SERVICES.

Place of Performance

Location: SHEPPARD AFB, WICHITA County, TEXAS, 76311

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $33.6 million to ASRC FEDERAL GULF STATE CONSTRUCTORS LLC for work described as: COMPREHENSIVE BASE OPERATION SUPPORT (BOS) FUNCTIONS IAW THE PWS FOR SHEPPARD AFB, TO INCLUDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, REAL PROPERTY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, AND ALL RELATED SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on comprehensive base operations support, including O&M, engineering, and environmental services. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is 729 days, with a firm-fixed-price structure. 4. This award represents a significant investment in maintaining critical infrastructure at Sheppard AFB. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 categorizes this as Facilities Support Services. 6. The base award value is approximately $33.6 million, with potential for adjustments based on performance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's firm-fixed-price structure suggests a degree of cost certainty. Benchmarking against similar comprehensive base operations support contracts would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. The award value of $33.6 million for a two-year period for a large Air Force base indicates a substantial but potentially reasonable investment for the scope of services. Further analysis of the contractor's historical performance and pricing on similar contracts would refine this assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on certain criteria. Six bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down costs and ensured that the selected contractor offered a strong value proposition for the essential base support services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force personnel and operations at Sheppard AFB, ensuring a well-maintained and functional base. Services delivered include operations and maintenance, engineering, environmental management, emergency response, and financial management. The geographic impact is concentrated at Sheppard AFB in Texas, supporting its mission readiness. The contract supports a workforce involved in facilities management and base operations, potentially including both direct hires and subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, given the comprehensive nature of the services.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical base operations could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent quality across all service areas (O&M, environmental, etc.) requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Multiple bidders indicate a competitive market for these services.
Contract duration allows for stable service delivery and potential for contractor efficiency gains.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of the broader facilities management industry. This sector encompasses a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government and commercial properties. The market size for facilities support services is substantial, driven by the need to maintain complex infrastructure. This specific contract is a significant award for Sheppard AFB, reflecting the scale and complexity of military base operations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside component for this specific award, as the 'sb' field is false. However, the contractor, ASRC Federal Gulf State Constructors LLC, may have its own subcontracting plans that could involve small businesses. Further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting goals and performance would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Department of the Air Force contracting and technical representatives at Sheppard AFB. Accountability measures will be tied to the performance work statement (PWS) and the firm-fixed-price contract terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award announcements and public contract databases, though specific performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Contracts
Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Government Infrastructure Management
Air Force Base Services
Defense Facilities Operations

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues given the breadth of services.
Contract duration may limit long-term strategic planning for base support.
Exclusion of sources in competition warrants scrutiny for fairness and optimal pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $33.6 million to ASRC FEDERAL GULF STATE CONSTRUCTORS LLC. COMPREHENSIVE BASE OPERATION SUPPORT (BOS) FUNCTIONS IAW THE PWS FOR SHEPPARD AFB, TO INCLUDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, REAL PROPERTY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, AND ALL RELATED SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL GULF STATE CONSTRUCTORS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the contractor's track record with similar base operations support contracts?

ASRC Federal Gulf State Constructors LLC is part of ASRC Federal, a company with a broad portfolio of government contracting services. While specific details on their past performance on identical 'Comprehensive Base Operation Support' contracts for Air Force bases are not provided in this data snippet, ASRC Federal entities have historically been involved in various infrastructure, engineering, and support services for federal agencies. A thorough review would involve examining their past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS) on similar-sized and scoped contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense, to assess their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage complex operations effectively. Their experience in construction and facilities management suggests a foundational capability for this type of work.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?

The awarded value of $33,569,439.70 for a 729-day period (approximately 2 years) for comprehensive base operations support at Sheppard AFB needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts. Without specific per-unit cost data or detailed breakdowns of services included, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) covers a broad range of activities. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor has priced the anticipated scope of work. To assess value, one would typically compare the total contract value and its constituent service costs against industry benchmarks for military base support, considering factors like geographic location, base size, and specific service requirements. The fact that six bids were received suggests competitive pricing was likely a significant factor in the award.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance deficiencies in delivering the comprehensive range of services (operations, maintenance, engineering, environmental, etc.), contractor financial instability, and unforeseen cost increases not covered by the firm-fixed-price structure. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the Air Force, including regular performance reviews, adherence to the Performance Work Statement (PWS), and clear communication channels. The firm-fixed-price contract itself mitigates cost overrun risks for the government, placing that burden on the contractor. Contractor selection based on past performance and financial health also serves as a risk mitigation factor. The exclusion of sources in the competition, while potentially narrowing the field, might also be a risk if it excluded highly capable bidders.

What is the historical spending pattern for base operations support at Sheppard AFB?

Historical spending data for base operations support at Sheppard AFB is not provided in the current data. To analyze this, one would need to access historical contract databases (e.g., FPDS-NG, SAM.gov) and search for previous contracts awarded for similar services at Sheppard AFB. This analysis would involve identifying the value, duration, and incumbent contractors of prior BOS contracts. Comparing the current award value ($33.6M over ~2 years) to historical spending would reveal trends in cost escalation, changes in service scope, and shifts in contracting strategies. Understanding past spending patterns is crucial for assessing whether the current contract represents a reasonable increase or decrease in investment and for identifying any significant changes in the scope or delivery of services.

How does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' impact the overall value and competition?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' (FOUCAES) is a specific type of competitive procurement. It means the solicitation was initially intended for full and open competition, but certain sources were excluded based on specific justifications (e.g., national security, specific capabilities not met). While it aims for broad competition, the exclusion of sources can potentially limit the number of bidders compared to pure full and open competition. In this case, six bids were received, which is a reasonable number and suggests that sufficient competition still existed. The impact on value depends on the reasons for exclusion; if justified and well-executed, it can still yield competitive pricing. However, if the exclusions were overly restrictive, it might have inadvertently reduced competitive pressure, potentially leading to less optimal pricing than if all capable sources had been allowed to bid.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation

Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $148,868,777

Exercised Options: $41,787,167

Current Obligation: $33,569,440

Actual Outlays: $6,016,252

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 11

Total Subaward Amount: $1,585,077

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline