EPA's Superfund Enforcement Support Services contract awarded to Leidos, Inc. for over $15.4 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,423,223 ($15.4M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2006-05-01
End Date: 2011-04-05
Contract Duration: 1,800 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.6K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: SUPERFUND ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (SESS) REMEDIAL
Place of Performance
Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $15.4 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: SUPERFUND ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (SESS) REMEDIAL Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the specialized nature of superfund site support. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competitive delivery order, suggesting a degree of price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, typical for long-term environmental consulting contracts. 4. Performance context is within the scope of environmental consulting services for EPA. 5. Sector positioning is within environmental services, a critical area for regulatory agencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of over $15.4 million for Superfund Enforcement Support Services (SESS) over a five-year period (2006-2011) suggests a significant investment in specialized environmental consulting. Benchmarking this against similar contracts is challenging without more granular data on the specific tasks performed and the complexity of the Superfund sites supported. However, the duration and scope indicate a substantial need for these services. The award to Leidos, Inc. places it among established contractors in the environmental services sector.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
This contract was awarded as a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' (CT: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER), indicating that it was competed among multiple potential offerors. The fact that it is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle suggests a structured procurement process. The level of competition for this specific order would ideally involve multiple bidders vying for the work, which generally leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering price negotiation and encouraging contractors to offer their best value. This approach mitigates the risk of overpaying for essential services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the public, through the remediation and management of hazardous waste sites. Services delivered include critical support for enforcing environmental laws and managing Superfund sites. Geographic impact is nationwide, as Superfund sites are located across the United States. Workforce implications include employment for environmental scientists, engineers, and legal support staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in complex environmental remediation projects.
- Reliance on contractor expertise for critical enforcement support.
- Long-term nature of Superfund sites may lead to extended contract periods and costs.
Positive Signals
- Award to a known entity (Leidos, Inc.) suggests a degree of confidence in their capabilities.
- Competitive award process implies potential for cost savings and quality service.
- Specialized nature of the services addresses a critical environmental protection need.
Sector Analysis
The environmental consulting services sector is a significant market driven by regulatory compliance and remediation needs. Federal agencies like the EPA are major clients, contracting for services related to hazardous waste management, site assessment, and enforcement support. The Superfund program, specifically, requires highly specialized expertise. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on legislative priorities and the identification of new or ongoing environmental challenges. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale environmental remediation and consulting contracts awarded by federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (SB: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Leidos, Inc., is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data snippet. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Leidos engages small businesses as subcontractors for specialized tasks or support services.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the EPA's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and potential penalties for non-compliance. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- Superfund Program
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Hazardous Waste Management
- Environmental Consulting
- Federal Enforcement Support
Risk Flags
- Long-term contract duration
- Specialized environmental services
- Potential for scope expansion
Tags
environmental-protection, environmental-consulting-services, superfund, enforcement-support, competitive-delivery-order, leidos-inc, environmental-protection-agency, us-federal-government, large-business, labor-hours, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $15.4 million to LEIDOS, INC.. SUPERFUND ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (SESS) REMEDIAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-05-01. End: 2011-04-05.
What is the historical spending trend for Superfund Enforcement Support Services (SESS) by the EPA?
Analyzing the historical spending trend for SESS requires access to multi-year contract data beyond this single award. The provided data shows a single award of $15.4 million to Leidos, Inc. from May 2006 to April 2011. To understand trends, one would need to examine awards for SESS or similar support services over a longer period, looking for increases or decreases in contract values, the number of awards, and the types of services procured. This would help identify shifts in EPA's reliance on external support for Superfund enforcement and potential changes in the market for these services.
How does the awarded amount of $15.4 million compare to the average cost of similar environmental consulting contracts for Superfund sites?
Directly comparing the $15.4 million award to 'average costs' is difficult without a standardized benchmark for 'similar' environmental consulting contracts for Superfund sites. The complexity, size, and specific remediation needs of each Superfund site vary significantly, impacting contract costs. This award covers a five-year period (2006-2011), making it a substantial, long-term engagement. To assess value, one would need to compare the scope of work, deliverables, and duration against other EPA contracts for comparable services, considering factors like the number of sites supported, the level of technical expertise required, and the specific enforcement actions facilitated.
What specific risks are associated with long-term environmental consulting contracts like this one?
Long-term environmental consulting contracts, such as the SESS award, carry several risks. One primary risk is 'scope creep,' where the project's requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns and schedule delays. Another risk is the potential for contractor over-reliance, where the agency becomes dependent on the contractor's institutional knowledge, making transitions difficult. Technical risks include unforeseen site conditions or the emergence of new environmental regulations that necessitate changes in approach. Furthermore, there's a risk of contractor performance degradation over time if not actively managed and monitored. Finally, budget uncertainties within the federal government can impact the continuity and funding of such long-term engagements.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record in providing environmental consulting services to the EPA or other federal agencies?
Leidos, Inc. has a significant track record in providing a wide range of technical and scientific services to federal agencies, including the EPA. Their expertise often spans environmental remediation, compliance, engineering, and data management. For the EPA, Leidos has historically been involved in various environmental programs, including Superfund-related activities. A comprehensive assessment of their track record for this specific SESS contract would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented issues or commendations, and the successful completion of deliverables during the contract period (2006-2011). Their general presence in the federal contracting space suggests they are a capable provider of such services.
How effective has the EPA's Superfund Enforcement Support Services (SESS) program been in achieving its goals?
The effectiveness of the EPA's SESS program, and by extension this contract, is measured by its contribution to the overall goals of the Superfund program: identifying responsible parties, negotiating settlements, overseeing cleanup actions, and ensuring compliance with environmental laws. Success metrics would include the number of enforcement actions supported, the amount of cost recovery achieved, the speed of site remediation influenced by enforcement, and the overall reduction in environmental and health risks at Superfund sites. While this specific contract award doesn't detail outcomes, the continued need for such services suggests the program is considered vital for the EPA's enforcement capabilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8031, MCLEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,823,223
Exercised Options: $16,823,223
Current Obligation: $15,423,223
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0076J
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-05-01
Current End Date: 2011-04-05
Potential End Date: 2011-04-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-04-06
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)