EPA's $10.7M contract for continued removal activities awarded to C M C, INC. in Kentucky

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,731,870 ($10.7M)

Contractor: C M C, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2007-09-28

End Date: 2016-12-31

Contract Duration: 3,382 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.2K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTINUE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES

Place of Performance

Location: NICHOLASVILLE, JESSAMINE County, KENTUCKY, 40356

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $10.7 million to C M C, INC. for work described as: CONTINUE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.7 million over a 9-year period suggests a moderate annual spend. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges if not closely monitored. 3. Awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), indicating a focus on environmental remediation services. 4. The duration of the contract (3382 days) points to a long-term need for these services. 5. The specific NAICS code 562910 signifies a focus on Remediation Services. 6. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, while flexible, carries inherent risks for cost overruns if not managed diligently. Without specific benchmarks for remediation services in Kentucky or comparable EPA contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The total value of $10.7 million spread over nearly a decade suggests an average annual spend of approximately $1.2 million, which appears reasonable for ongoing environmental remediation, but a detailed cost breakdown and comparison to industry standards would be necessary for a more robust evaluation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. It is listed as a Delivery Order, which could have been competed under a broader contract or awarded through various means. Without information on the number of bidders or the solicitation method, it is impossible to assess the extent of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of transparency regarding competition makes it difficult to determine if taxpayers received the best possible pricing for these essential environmental services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely communities impacted by environmental contamination requiring removal activities, as overseen by the EPA. The services delivered involve the physical removal and remediation of hazardous substances or pollutants. The geographic impact is localized to Kentucky, where the contract was performed. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled labor in environmental remediation and related fields within Kentucky.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost escalation without strict oversight.
Long contract duration may not adapt well to evolving remediation technologies or regulatory changes.
Limited competition information prevents assessment of optimal pricing for taxpayers.

Positive Signals

Awarded by the EPA, suggesting adherence to environmental regulations and standards.
The contract addresses critical environmental cleanup needs.
Long-term award indicates a sustained commitment to addressing environmental issues in the region.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, a critical component of the broader environmental services industry. This sector involves the cleanup of contaminated sites, waste management, and pollution control. The market size for environmental remediation is substantial, driven by regulatory requirements and increasing awareness of environmental protection. This specific contract with the EPA for removal activities is a direct example of government spending in this essential area, supporting efforts to mitigate environmental hazards.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. Without this information, it is not possible to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem or the extent to which small businesses participated in fulfilling the contract's objectives.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Environmental Protection Agency's contracting and program management offices. The Inspector General's office for the EPA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency regarding performance metrics and expenditures would be key to assessing accountability, but this information is not detailed in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
RCRA Corrective Actions
Brownfields Program
Environmental Services Contracts
Hazardous Waste Management

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of transparency regarding competition level.
Need for detailed performance metrics to assess value for money.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $10.7 million to C M C, INC.. CONTINUE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is C M C, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-28. End: 2016-12-31.

What is the track record of C M C, INC. with the EPA and similar environmental contracts?

Information regarding C M C, INC.'s specific track record with the EPA or on similar environmental remediation contracts is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented disputes or contract modifications, and the company's history in completing projects of similar scope and complexity. Without this historical data, it is difficult to gauge their reliability and effectiveness in executing environmental cleanup operations. Further research into federal procurement databases and contractor performance systems would be necessary to build a complete picture of their past performance.

How does the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure compare to fixed-price contracts for similar remediation services?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts offer flexibility, allowing the contractor to bill for actual labor hours and material costs incurred. This can be advantageous for projects with uncertain scopes or unforeseen complexities, such as environmental remediation. However, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost escalation for the government compared to fixed-price contracts, as the total cost is not predetermined. Fixed-price contracts provide greater cost certainty but may require a more clearly defined scope upfront and can lead to contractor risk if unforeseen issues arise. For remediation services, the choice between T&M and fixed-price often depends on the level of site characterization and the predictability of the cleanup work. T&M might be preferred for initial assessment or complex, evolving sites, while fixed-price could be suitable for well-defined removal tasks.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this 'continued removal activities' contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for environmental removal activities, KPIs would focus on the effectiveness of the cleanup (e.g., reduction in contaminant levels to meet regulatory standards), adherence to safety protocols, timely completion of milestones, proper waste disposal, and compliance with environmental regulations. The EPA would establish these metrics in the contract's statement of work and monitor the contractor's performance against them. Without access to the contract's SOW or performance reports, a detailed assessment of success is not possible.

What is the historical spending trend for 'Remediation Services' by the EPA, and how does this contract fit within that trend?

The provided data focuses on a single contract and does not offer historical spending trends for 'Remediation Services' by the EPA. To understand this contract's place within the broader spending landscape, one would need to analyze EPA's budget allocations and contract awards for NAICS code 562910 (Remediation Services) over several fiscal years. This would reveal whether spending in this category is increasing, decreasing, or stable, and whether this $10.7 million award represents a typical, large, or small investment relative to historical patterns. Such an analysis would provide context on the EPA's priorities and resource allocation for environmental cleanup efforts.

Are there any known environmental risks or controversies associated with the sites where C M C, INC. is performing removal activities under this contract?

The provided data does not contain information about specific environmental risks or controversies associated with the sites where C M C, INC. is performing removal activities under this contract. Identifying such issues would require cross-referencing the contract's performance location (Kentucky) with EPA databases of contaminated sites, Superfund sites, or other regulated environmental areas. Public records, environmental impact statements, and news archives related to specific cleanup locations would be necessary to ascertain any associated risks or public concerns. Without this site-specific information, it is impossible to assess the nature or severity of potential environmental challenges.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Contractor Details

Address: 1151 JESSAMINE STATION PI, NICHOLASVILLE, KY, 40356

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,731,870

Exercised Options: $10,731,870

Current Obligation: $10,731,870

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: EPS40702

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline