EPA Spends $14M on Tar Creek Remedial Action by CH2M HILL, Inc. from 2006-2015
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,978,303 ($14.0M)
Contractor: CH2M Hill, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2006-06-07
End Date: 2015-12-31
Contract Duration: 3,494 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.0K/day
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: TAR CREEK REMEDIAL ACTION
Place of Performance
Location: DALLAS, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75251
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $14.0 million to CH2M HILL, INC. for work described as: TAR CREEK REMEDIAL ACTION Key points: 1. Significant investment in environmental remediation for Tar Creek. 2. CH2M HILL, Inc. was the primary contractor. 3. Project spanned nearly a decade, indicating complex and long-term challenges. 4. Environmental Protection Agency managed the contract. 5. Focus on remediation services in Texas.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award of $13.98M over 9 years suggests a substantial cost for remediation services. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to similar large-scale environmental cleanup projects, assessing value is difficult. The Time and Materials pricing model can lead to cost overruns if not tightly managed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract type is listed as 'TIME AND MATERIALS' with 2 delivery orders. The method of competition is not specified, but the duration and scale suggest a potentially competitive process. However, the lack of detail makes it hard to assess if the pricing was optimized through robust competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were allocated for a critical environmental cleanup. The effectiveness and efficiency of the spending directly impact the long-term environmental health and associated costs.
Public Impact
Addresses long-standing environmental contamination at Tar Creek. Potential impact on local communities and ecosystems in Ottawa County, Oklahoma. Demonstrates federal commitment to environmental stewardship and Superfund site remediation. Long-term project management and cost control are key considerations for public perception.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials pricing can inflate costs.
- Lack of detailed competition information.
- Long project duration may indicate unforeseen complexities or cost escalations.
Positive Signals
- Addresses a significant environmental issue.
- Contract awarded to a known entity in the field.
- Clear agency oversight (EPA).
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation projects are often complex, long-term, and costly, requiring specialized expertise. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on the scale and nature of contamination. This $14M award over 9 years for a Superfund site falls within the expected range for significant environmental cleanup efforts.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides or participation by small businesses in this contract. Large-scale environmental remediation projects are often dominated by larger, specialized firms.
Oversight & Accountability
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) managed this contract. Oversight would typically involve monitoring contractor performance, adherence to scope, and cost controls, especially given the Time and Materials pricing structure. The number of delivery orders (2) suggests some level of task management.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract.
- Lack of transparency regarding competition method.
- Long project duration raises questions about initial planning and execution efficiency.
- Environmental remediation projects are inherently complex and carry risks of unforeseen challenges.
Tags
remediation-services, environmental-protection-agency, tx, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $14.0 million to CH2M HILL, INC.. TAR CREEK REMEDIAL ACTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CH2M HILL, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-06-07. End: 2015-12-31.
What was the specific scope of work for the Tar Creek Remedial Action, and how did it evolve over the contract period?
The scope of work for the Tar Creek Remedial Action likely involved addressing environmental contamination from historical mining activities, such as mine waste removal, water treatment, and site restoration. The evolution over the contract period would depend on site conditions, regulatory requirements, and discoveries made during the remediation process. Detailed project reports would be needed to fully understand the scope's progression and its impact on costs.
How effectively did CH2M HILL, Inc. manage costs and timelines under the Time and Materials contract, given its duration?
Assessing cost and timeline effectiveness requires detailed performance reports and comparison against initial estimates and benchmarks. The Time and Materials (T&M) structure inherently carries a risk of cost escalation if not rigorously managed. Without access to performance metrics, it's difficult to definitively state effectiveness, though the project's completion within the award amount suggests it was managed within budgetary expectations, albeit over a long period.
What were the key environmental outcomes achieved by this $14M investment in the Tar Creek Remedial Action?
The primary environmental outcome would be the reduction or containment of hazardous substances at the Tar Creek site, mitigating risks to human health and the environment. This could include improved water quality, stabilization of mine waste, and restoration of affected habitats. Quantifiable metrics on contaminant levels reduced or areas remediated would be necessary to fully evaluate the success of the investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)
Address: CH2M HILL, INC., ENGLEWOOD, CO, 80112
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,978,303
Exercised Options: $13,978,303
Current Obligation: $13,978,303
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: EPW06021
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-06-07
Current End Date: 2015-12-31
Potential End Date: 2020-02-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-02-07
More Contracts from CH2M Hill, Inc.
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Btrp Georgia — $158.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $80.8M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Cercla Munitions Response Sites, Title II Services, Operations and Program Support Services, and Community Relations, Former Vieques Naval Training Range and Naval Ammunition Support Detachment, Vieques, Puerto Rico — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- Armenia Phase II — $49.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)