HUD's $15.4M DAPIAS & IPIA contract awarded to Institute for Building Technology and Safety

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,427,273 ($15.4M)

Contractor: Institute for Building Technology and Safety

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2002-11-29

End Date: 2007-08-26

Contract Duration: 1,731 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MONITORING OF DESIGN APPROVAL PRIMARY INSPECTION (DAPIAS) AND IPIA

Place of Performance

Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20170

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $15.4 million to INSTITUTE FOR BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND SAFETY for work described as: MONITORING OF DESIGN APPROVAL PRIMARY INSPECTION (DAPIAS) AND IPIA Key points: 1. Contract value of $15.4M over 5 years. 2. Full and open competition was utilized. 3. Potential risk associated with cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type. 4. Spending falls under Office Administrative Services within HUD.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract utilized a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Benchmarking CPFF contracts for similar administrative services is difficult without more granular data on the scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the CPFF structure may still allow for cost overruns.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for administrative services, with the CPFF structure posing a potential risk for cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Ensures essential administrative and inspection services for HUD programs. Supports the Department of Housing and Urban Development's operational efficiency. The contract's duration and value indicate a significant commitment to these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under administrative services, a broad category. Benchmarking spending for such services is challenging without specific details on the nature of the inspections and approvals.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by HUD's Office of Administrative Services. The CPFF structure necessitates diligent monitoring to control costs and ensure value.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

office-administrative-services, department-of-housing-and-urban-developm, va, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $15.4 million to INSTITUTE FOR BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND SAFETY. MONITORING OF DESIGN APPROVAL PRIMARY INSPECTION (DAPIAS) AND IPIA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INSTITUTE FOR BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND SAFETY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-11-29. End: 2007-08-26.

What specific services are included under DAPIAS and IPIA to justify the $15.4M cost?

The contract covers the Monitoring of Design Approval Primary Inspection (DAPIAS) and Inspection Program Administration Services (IPIA). These likely involve technical reviews, site inspections, and administrative support for HUD's housing and building programs. A detailed breakdown of service hours and rates would be needed to fully assess the cost justification.

What are the primary risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this service?

The primary risk of a CPFF contract is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs, as the government agrees to pay all allowable costs plus a fixed fee. This can lead to cost overruns if the government's oversight and negotiation are not robust, potentially resulting in a higher overall expenditure than anticipated.

How effectively does this contract support HUD's mission of ensuring safe and affordable housing?

The contract supports HUD's mission by providing essential oversight and administrative functions related to building design and inspections. Effective execution of these services contributes to ensuring compliance with safety standards and program requirements, indirectly supporting the delivery of safe and affordable housing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesOffice Administrative ServicesOffice Administrative Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Contractor Details

Address: 505 HUNTMAR PARK DR # 250, HERNDON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,460,000

Exercised Options: $15,460,000

Current Obligation: $15,427,273

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2002-11-29

Current End Date: 2007-08-26

Potential End Date: 2007-08-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-06-12

More Contracts from Institute for Building Technology and Safety

View all Institute for Building Technology and Safety federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending